The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,285 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 客户服务, 持续改进和创新。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
定制和灵活的模块化选项
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
|
−
移动和云集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #14 39 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Redforts hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, highly integrated system trusted by thousands of properties worldwide, while Redforts provides a straightforward, cost-effective management suite with a smaller but consistent user base. Both solve core hotel management challenges, but their approaches and strengths diverge significantly. How do you determine which system aligns best with your current needs and future goals?
Both Cloudbeds and Redforts aim to streamline your hotel operations by automating manual tasks, reducing errors, and improving guest experience. Cloudbeds excels in its extensive integration ecosystem, offering over 190 verified partners, which allows for real-time synchronization across multiple channels, revenue tools, and property types. Redforts, in contrast, emphasizes simplicity and affordability with a smaller, more manageable feature set and just 2 verified integrations, focusing on core functionalities.
While Cloudbeds' feature count (46 shared + 18 exclusive) and global presence (operating in 101 countries) make it suitable for larger, multi-property, or growth-oriented hotels, Redforts’ focus on ease of use and affordability makes it attractive for smaller properties or those seeking quicker deployment. Both systems can improve operational consistency, but Cloudbeds’ broader capabilities may be overkill for very small hotels, whereas Redforts might lack some advanced features larger properties require.
Given recent reviews—Cloudbeds with 81 in the last six months and over 1,000 total reviews—its data is more current and reliable. In contrast, Redforts’ recent review count is just 1. Do you want the most recent, detailed feedback or a system with a proven track record at scale?
If your hotel needs a scalable, highly integrated platform supporting complex operations, multi-channel distribution, and extensive revenue management, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its broad feature set, including advanced analytics, automated night audit, and an intuitive interface rated at 4.61/5, has helped properties like The Zero Hotels and South Wind Motel double occupancy and increase revenue significantly.
On the other hand, if your hotel is small, operates with straightforward processes, and prioritizes affordability and ease of learning, Redforts could serve you well. Its core reservation, channel management, and online payment modules are rated highly for usability, making it ideal for properties that want to start managing more efficiently without a steep learning curve. The lower price ($500 vs $600) and simpler setup are compelling for budget-conscious or smaller teams.
If your property is medium-sized or plans to expand, Cloudbeds’ scalability and extensive integrations make it the safer long-term investment. Redforts suits small hotels with tight budgets and limited technical staff, especially if quick onboarding and basic automation fulfill your current operational needs.
Cloudbeds’ user interface is highly praised for its simplicity and organization, with a 4.61/5 rating. Users emphasize its intuitive workflows for reservations, housekeeping, and reporting, often mentioning how it reduces training time and administrative effort. Cloudbeds’ onboarding score of 4.45/5 reflects its focus on quick adoption, but some users report that initial setup can be complex, especially integrating third-party systems.
Redforts also boasts an impressive ease of use, with a 4.68/5 rating, and many long-term users praise its straightforward design. Its interface appears modern enough, but some reviews note it could benefit from visual updates to match current design standards. Redforts’ onboarding score of 4.32/5 indicates a solid, if slightly less refined, experience.
Edge: Cloudbeds, thanks to its broader industry reputation, extensive training resources, and recent review activity, signaling ongoing usability improvements.
Cloudbeds offers 46 shared features plus 18 exclusive functions, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, automated night audits, and a spa & wellness module. These tools support complex operations, multi-property management, and revenue growth strategies, making Cloudbeds a feature-rich environment.
Redforts provides core functionalities such as PMS, channel management, booking engine, online payments, revenue, and yield management, along with integration with POS systems and self-check-in kiosks. While comprehensive, its feature set (roughly 46 features total) is more streamlined, focusing on essential management tasks without the extensive extras Cloudbeds offers.
Ultimately, if advanced features like automated night audits, multi-lingual support, and detailed analytics are critical, Cloudbeds has the edge. For straightforward operations at a lower price point, Redforts’ core suite suffices.
Edge: Cloudbeds, with its wider array of exclusive tools and ongoing feature expansion, especially in analytics and automation.
Cloudbeds’ support ratings (4.41/5) are slightly behind Redforts’ (4.53/5), but recent reviews highlight quick, attentive assistance from both vendors. Cloudbeds’ support team is praised for responsiveness, with comments like “Cloudbeds’ support team has always responded promptly and empathetically,” though some users note ongoing challenges during complex integrations.
Redforts’ customer support is consistently described as friendly and efficient, with reviews emphasizing near-immediate responses and proactive communication. Its small size (7 employees) allows for personalized service, which many users appreciate.
Edge: Redforts, due to its higher recent support ratings and more personalized service approach.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating (4.63/5) is significantly higher than Redforts’ 0/5 (likely due to limited reviews and data inconsistency). Cloudbeds’ large review base (1,071 reviews) and recent activity—81 reviews in the last six months—indicate strong, current user satisfaction.
Redforts’ reviews are fewer and less recent, but those available are positive. Its NPS score of 9.5/10 shows high customer loyalty, particularly among small properties.
Considering review volume and recency, Cloudbeds’ ratings are more reliable and representative of broad user satisfaction.
Edge: Cloudbeds, with a large, recent review base and high satisfaction scores.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $600 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and global support, suited for mid-size and larger properties.
Redforts costs $500 per month, offering a slightly lower entry point and no trial option. Its focus on core functionalities makes it an attractive budget choice for smaller hotels or hostels.
Pricing alone shouldn’t drive your decision—consider whether the feature set aligns with your operational needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, high-performance platform with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and strong recent reviews. Its scalability and automation capabilities make it ideal for medium to large properties or those with growth ambitions, despite its higher cost and setup complexity.
Redforts is a simpler, more affordable alternative, suited for small hotels, hostels, and properties that want quick deployment and minimal fuss. Its emphasis on core functionalities, ease of use, and responsive support make it a good fit for operations prioritizing efficiency over extensive customization.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system to support expansion and complex operations, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. For smaller, budget-conscious properties seeking reliable management with a focus on simplicity, Redforts remains a solid choice.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问