项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 1,350 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 培训、易用性和入职, 支持响应能力和人工协助, 日历和预订可见性,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
培训、易用性和入职
▾
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
+
支持响应能力和人工协助
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
日历和预订可见性
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票和账单处理
▾
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #14 39 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Redforts hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, highly integrated system trusted by thousands of properties worldwide, while Redforts provides a straightforward, cost-effective management suite with a smaller but consistent user base. Both solve core hotel management challenges, but their approaches and strengths diverge significantly. How do you determine which system aligns best with your current needs and future goals?
Both Cloudbeds and Redforts aim to streamline your hotel operations by automating manual tasks, reducing errors, and improving guest experience. Cloudbeds excels in its extensive integration ecosystem, offering over 190 verified partners, which allows for real-time synchronization across multiple channels, revenue tools, and property types. Redforts, in contrast, emphasizes simplicity and affordability with a smaller, more manageable feature set and just 2 verified integrations, focusing on core functionalities.
While Cloudbeds' feature count (46 shared + 18 exclusive) and global presence (operating in 101 countries) make it suitable for larger, multi-property, or growth-oriented hotels, Redforts’ focus on ease of use and affordability makes it attractive for smaller properties or those seeking quicker deployment. Both systems can improve operational consistency, but Cloudbeds’ broader capabilities may be overkill for very small hotels, whereas Redforts might lack some advanced features larger properties require.
Given recent reviews—Cloudbeds with 81 in the last six months and over 1,000 total reviews—its data is more current and reliable. In contrast, Redforts’ recent review count is just 1. Do you want the most recent, detailed feedback or a system with a proven track record at scale?
If your hotel needs a scalable, highly integrated platform supporting complex operations, multi-channel distribution, and extensive revenue management, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its broad feature set, including advanced analytics, automated night audit, and an intuitive interface rated at 4.61/5, has helped properties like The Zero Hotels and South Wind Motel double occupancy and increase revenue significantly.
On the other hand, if your hotel is small, operates with straightforward processes, and prioritizes affordability and ease of learning, Redforts could serve you well. Its core reservation, channel management, and online payment modules are rated highly for usability, making it ideal for properties that want to start managing more efficiently without a steep learning curve. The lower price ($500 vs $600) and simpler setup are compelling for budget-conscious or smaller teams.
If your property is medium-sized or plans to expand, Cloudbeds’ scalability and extensive integrations make it the safer long-term investment. Redforts suits small hotels with tight budgets and limited technical staff, especially if quick onboarding and basic automation fulfill your current operational needs.
Cloudbeds’ user interface is highly praised for its simplicity and organization, with a 4.61/5 rating. Users emphasize its intuitive workflows for reservations, housekeeping, and reporting, often mentioning how it reduces training time and administrative effort. Cloudbeds’ onboarding score of 4.45/5 reflects its focus on quick adoption, but some users report that initial setup can be complex, especially integrating third-party systems.
Redforts also boasts an impressive ease of use, with a 4.68/5 rating, and many long-term users praise its straightforward design. Its interface appears modern enough, but some reviews note it could benefit from visual updates to match current design standards. Redforts’ onboarding score of 4.32/5 indicates a solid, if slightly less refined, experience.
Edge: Cloudbeds, thanks to its broader industry reputation, extensive training resources, and recent review activity, signaling ongoing usability improvements.
Cloudbeds offers 46 shared features plus 18 exclusive functions, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, automated night audits, and a spa & wellness module. These tools support complex operations, multi-property management, and revenue growth strategies, making Cloudbeds a feature-rich environment.
Redforts provides core functionalities such as PMS, channel management, booking engine, online payments, revenue, and yield management, along with integration with POS systems and self-check-in kiosks. While comprehensive, its feature set (roughly 46 features total) is more streamlined, focusing on essential management tasks without the extensive extras Cloudbeds offers.
Ultimately, if advanced features like automated night audits, multi-lingual support, and detailed analytics are critical, Cloudbeds has the edge. For straightforward operations at a lower price point, Redforts’ core suite suffices.
Edge: Cloudbeds, with its wider array of exclusive tools and ongoing feature expansion, especially in analytics and automation.
Cloudbeds’ support ratings (4.41/5) are slightly behind Redforts’ (4.53/5), but recent reviews highlight quick, attentive assistance from both vendors. Cloudbeds’ support team is praised for responsiveness, with comments like “Cloudbeds’ support team has always responded promptly and empathetically,” though some users note ongoing challenges during complex integrations.
Redforts’ customer support is consistently described as friendly and efficient, with reviews emphasizing near-immediate responses and proactive communication. Its small size (7 employees) allows for personalized service, which many users appreciate.
Edge: Redforts, due to its higher recent support ratings and more personalized service approach.
Cloudbeds’ overall rating (4.63/5) is significantly higher than Redforts’ 0/5 (likely due to limited reviews and data inconsistency). Cloudbeds’ large review base (1,071 reviews) and recent activity—81 reviews in the last six months—indicate strong, current user satisfaction.
Redforts’ reviews are fewer and less recent, but those available are positive. Its NPS score of 9.5/10 shows high customer loyalty, particularly among small properties.
Considering review volume and recency, Cloudbeds’ ratings are more reliable and representative of broad user satisfaction.
Edge: Cloudbeds, with a large, recent review base and high satisfaction scores.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $600 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and global support, suited for mid-size and larger properties.
Redforts costs $500 per month, offering a slightly lower entry point and no trial option. Its focus on core functionalities makes it an attractive budget choice for smaller hotels or hostels.
Pricing alone shouldn’t drive your decision—consider whether the feature set aligns with your operational needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, high-performance platform with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and strong recent reviews. Its scalability and automation capabilities make it ideal for medium to large properties or those with growth ambitions, despite its higher cost and setup complexity.
Redforts is a simpler, more affordable alternative, suited for small hotels, hostels, and properties that want quick deployment and minimal fuss. Its emphasis on core functionalities, ease of use, and responsive support make it a good fit for operations prioritizing efficiency over extensive customization.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system to support expansion and complex operations, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. For smaller, budget-conscious properties seeking reliable management with a focus on simplicity, Redforts remains a solid choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获... Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获得更深入的高级功能指导。
支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这... 支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这对于可能影响客人体验和收入的紧急前台问题来说是有问题的。
用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、... 用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、拆分住宿和房间变更,减少繁忙操作中的错误。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbed... 审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbeds中拥有更强的税务、货币和会计处理功能,而不是使用单独的系统。
一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切... 一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切换到电子邮件或桌面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 199 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Redforts 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐