The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 169 条经验证的评价后,Clover 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 用户界面和报表, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和报表
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
操作改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店POS系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 44 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 94 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 74 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 41 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 31 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 14 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 130 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #5 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #6 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel often boils down to understanding the core capabilities, ease of use, and the support behind each product. Clover and Mews POS both aim to improve your operational workflows but target different hotel segments and feature sets. Your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic priorities will influence which system aligns best with your goals.
Clover offers a broad point-of-sale solution primarily designed for small to medium-sized retail and foodservice businesses, with limited hotel-specific features and a narrow regional presence. Mews POS, by contrast, is a purpose-built hotel restaurant POS with extensive integrations and a strong global presence, especially among boutique and branded hotels.
So, which one truly serves your hotel’s needs better? That’s the question we'll answer in this comparison.
Clover, owned by First Data, is a general-purpose POS primarily built for retail and small business owners. Its open-architecture platform supports myriad hardware options and simplifies payments, inventory, and basic sales reporting—ideal for independent hotels or small groups with straightforward needs.
Mews POS, developed specifically for the hospitality industry, combines POS, inventory, and guest data within a unified ecosystem. It offers deep integrations with property management and online ordering, streamlining operations across multiple hotel sizes and types.
Both systems aim to streamline transactions, but Clover’s focus is on flexible payments and hardware options, while Mews emphasizes hospitality-specific functions and integrations. Which one aligns better with your operational complexity and growth plans?
If your hotel needs a scalable, hotel-focused POS with deep integrations and automation features, Mews POS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (29 unique features) supports complex restaurant operations, real-time reporting, and guest data management, making it suitable for boutique, branded, and multi-property hotels.
If your hotel primarily requires a simple, standalone payment terminal with minimal integration needs—especially if you already use a broader POS or restaurant system—Clover might suffice. However, given Clover’s limited hotel-specific feature set and regional presence, it’s less suitable for hotels aiming to modernize or expand.
Considering the review data, Mews’ 156 recent reviews and a 9.32/5 NPS score demonstrate strong user satisfaction. Clover, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers little evidence of ongoing support or effectiveness.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS earns a high user rating of 4.74/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Hoteliers praise its cross-device accessibility, which simplifies staff training and daily operations across desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
Clover’s usability isn’t well-documented in hotel-specific contexts, and its general-purpose POS can be complex for non-retail users. Its hardware options can also be overwhelming, especially without dedicated hotel workflows.
Given the recent and detailed reviews, Edge: Mews POS.
Mews boasts an impressive 29 unique features tailored to hotel restaurant operations: PCI compliance, discounts & promotions, upselling, digital menus, inventory & ingredient management, mobile ordering, integrated kitchen display, rewards programs, and extensive reporting tools. These are designed to streamline guest interactions and backend management.
Clover, with zero hotel-specific features, focuses on payment processing, hardware flexibility, and basic sales reporting. While suitable for retail, it lacks the comprehensive operational functions needed for hotel restaurants and F&B services.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews’ user reviews consistently rate support around 4.43/5, citing reliable, solution-oriented service and effective onboarding, especially praised for its well-designed onboarding process. Clients mention that support is responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial during implementation and growth phases.
Clover's support ratings are not available, but the absence of recent reviews or detailed user feedback suggests limited or less active customer support for hotel-specific needs. Its focus on retail implies support may not be tailored for hospitality.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews offers 336 verified integrations, including popular names like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and over 1,000 via Mews Marketplace. These cover PMS, online ordering, payment gateways, and more, providing a highly connected operational ecosystem.
Clover’s single verified partner indicates limited integration options, which restricts hotel-specific automation and data flow. Its ecosystem is more suited to retail environments.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews’ reviews, with 66 recent entries, reflect high satisfaction, especially in boutique, branded, and city center hotels. Its 9.32/5 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend underscore its strong reputation among hotel operators.
Clover lacks recent review data or ratings specific to hotels, making it impossible to gauge hotelier satisfaction. Based on available evidence, Mews clearly has the edge.
Edge: Mews POS.
Clover’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not seem to have a standard hotel-focused pricing model. It generally operates with hardware costs and transaction fees, which may vary significantly by use case.
Mews charges a base fee of $200/month, with no implementation or setup fees, and offers a transparent pricing model suitable for hotels. Its value is reflected in the extensive features and integrations that support scalable operations.
Given the available info, Mews offers a more predictable and aligned pricing structure for hotels.
Edge: Mews POS.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Mews POS is a dedicated, hotel-centric solution with a proven track record, extensive features, and strong recent reviews. Its deep integrations, automation, and ease of use make it well-suited for hotels aiming to elevate guest experience and streamline operations.
Clover, by contrast, is a generic POS system better suited for retail or small-scale venues not requiring hotel-specific workflows. Its limited hotel focus and lack of recent reviews make it less reliable for hospitality use.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a comprehensive, integrated, and scalable POS platform that can grow with your business. Opt for Clover only if your operations are minimal, retail-focused, and regionally supported, with no plans for expansion into complex hotel services.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方... Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方面。
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客... 该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客互动。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clover 和 Mews POS 共享许多核心 Hotel POS Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clover 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews POS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews POS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clover:否。Mews POS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel POS Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clover 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问