The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Comanche International 表现出色 .
ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 395 |
在分析了 395 条经验证的评价后,Comanche International 用户最看重其 ,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
数据和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 145 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 25 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #5 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #7 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #7 70 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 8 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 386 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #57 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #32 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and profitability. You’re evaluating Comanche PMS by Comanche International and ThinkReservations PMS by ThinkReservations, both designed to streamline hotel management. While Comanche offers a broad IT solution rooted in international markets, ThinkReservations provides a feature-rich platform with a strong North American presence. But which one truly supports your hotel’s specific needs?
Both products aim to simplify daily tasks, improve efficiency, and boost revenue, yet their approaches and strengths differ. Does your hotel prioritize extensive online integrations and modern usability, or do you need a comprehensive system tailored for small to mid-sized inns and B&Bs?
Comanche PMS is a longstanding IT solution based in Thailand, serving over 900 clients across 18 countries since 1996. It covers a wide range of hospitality operations, including hotels, restaurants, clubs, and resorts, emphasizing total operational control. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, is a cloud-based PMS focused primarily on North American small hotels, inns, and vacation rentals, boasting a modern interface and a large user base with over 356 recent reviews.
The key difference lies in their review volume and recency: ThinkReservations’ significantly higher review count (356 vs. none for Comanche) and recent ratings (4.88/5) make it the more tested and trusted option today. Comanche’s lack of recent reviews and absence of a visible user rating suggest limited current support or market presence. Are you comfortable adopting a less-reviewed platform, or do you prefer the stability of a product backed by recent user feedback?
If your hotel is a small property, inn, or bed & breakfast looking for an easy-to-use, highly supported platform with extensive online integrations, go with ThinkReservations. Its 4.88/5 rating from 356 reviews, recent customer praise, and features like channel management, online booking, and guest messaging make it ideal for properties aiming to increase revenue while reducing operational hassle.
If, however, your hotel operates in Asia, Europe, or the Middle East and requires a total IT solution capable of managing restaurant, club, and resort operations with a customizable system, Comanche might seem appealing. Yet, with no recent reviews or clear evidence of active support, it may not be the best choice unless your requirements are very specific to its legacy setup.
In summary: For most hotels seeking modern features and proven support, ThinkReservations is the definitive choice. Comanche’s lack of recent validation makes it less suitable for current needs.
ThinkReservations’ UI scores 4.82/5 and has a proven onboarding experience rated 4.73/5, with many users describing it as “easy to use” and “like adding another employee.” Customers highlight its intuitive booking engine, automated messaging, and straightforward setup as key strengths, supported by recent positive reviews.
Comanche PMS, with a 0/5 usability rating and no recent reviews, offers an unclear user experience. Its platform, rooted in traditional IT solutions, may require more training and potentially present a steeper learning curve for staff unfamiliar with legacy systems.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers a robust suite of 39 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, guest profiles, automated reminders, digital registration, and real-time reporting. It also provides integrations with major OTAs like Airbnb, Expedia, and TripAdvisor, along with payment processing, housekeeing modules, and multi-lingual support.
Comanche PMS lacks documented features, with no unique functionalities listed beyond its core IT solution. Its platform appears to focus more on basic reservation and operational functions without the extensive add-ons ThinkReservations provides.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations’ support ratings are one of its standout features, with a 4.82/5 score and many reviews praising its prompt, knowledgeable, and accessible team. Users often describe their experience as “like having another employee,” emphasizing its reliability and ongoing improvements.
In contrast, Comanche International has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving support quality and responsiveness unclear. Without current user feedback, it’s difficult to assess whether Comanche can match ThinkReservations’ level of customer service.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations connects with 16 verified partners, including top OTAs and channel managers like Expedia, Airbnb, and Triptease. Its integrations cover payment processing, guest messaging, and digital check-in, streamlining operations across multiple platforms.
Comanche International, with 12 verified partners, includes key players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and LodgIQ but misses some of the broader integrations that are standard today. Its fewer and less recent integrations suggest it’s less adaptable to modern hospitality tech stacks.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations boasts a 4.88/5 rating from 356 reviews, with many recent reviews highlighting its ease of use, support, and revenue-boosting features. Hotels of all sizes, especially inns and B&Bs, rate it highly, frequently mentioning its automation and intuitive interface.
Comanche International has no recent reviews or ratings and is not rated by users in the last six months. Its absence of current feedback indicates it’s not actively supporting or improving its platform, making it a less reliable choice.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Comanche International’s pricing details are unavailable, which might imply custom quotes or higher barriers to entry. ThinkReservations’ straightforward pricing is $500 monthly, with no mention of implementation fees or additional charges, providing clearer budgeting.
Since Comanche lacks transparent pricing info, your decision may depend on negotiating custom agreements, whereas ThinkReservations offers predictable costs with proven value for small to mid-sized hotels.
The core difference is that ThinkReservations is a highly reviewed, actively supported cloud platform with a broad array of features designed for small to mid-sized hotels. Comanche, meanwhile, is a legacy solution with no recent validation, likely better suited for properties already familiar with its niche market.
If your hotel needs a modern, reliable, and well-supported PMS, go with ThinkReservations. It offers proven support, a feature-rich environment, and recent positive reviews that back up its claims.
Choose Comanche if your hotel operates across multiple regions with complex needs, and you are comfortable with legacy systems and less current support. However, for most hotels today, ThinkReservations is the safer, smarter choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Comanche PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 27 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。
ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。
该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。
强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Comanche PMS 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Comanche PMS 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Comanche PMS:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Comanche International 的 HT Score 为 0,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问