The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Desbravador 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Desbravador 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Desbravador |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Desbravador |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Desbravador |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Desbravador |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Desbravador by Desbravador hinges on your property's specific needs and your operational priorities. Counter, with its established presence and extensive review base, has proven its effectiveness in simplifying hostel management, especially with its array of features tailored for hostels and small hotels. Desbravador, however, remains unreviewed and untested in the market, leaving its true efficacy and user satisfaction less certain.
Counter addresses core property management challenges with a broad feature set and a proven track record, whereas Desbravador promises an all-in-one approach but lacks review data to confirm its performance. Are you prepared to adopt a system that has a large user base and ongoing positive feedback, or are you interested in an unproven platform that might still be shaping its reputation?
Counter holds a commanding advantage with 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, reflecting strong, recent user satisfaction. Its high rating in ease of use (4.6/5), customer support (4.96/5), and value for money (4.8/5) confirms its reliability for small and hostel properties. Desbravador, with zero reviews and a score of zero, provides no tangible user feedback or proven performance data.
If your hotel needs a well-tested, feature-rich PMS with recent reviews, Counter is the clear choice. Desbravador’s untested platform makes it a risky pick for properties seeking assured support and proven results.
Counter excels for hotels that prioritize ease of use, comprehensive features, and trusted customer support. Its interface and onboarding process are rated 4.6/5 and 4.7/5 respectively, making staff training straightforward. Conversely, Desbravador offers no user ratings or reviews, leaving its usability and support quality unverified.
Counter’s extensive feature list includes channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and automated night audits—features that are absent in Desbravador. For hotels that require a mature, reliable PMS with proven functionality, Counter is the safer, smarter choice. Would you prefer a platform with a proven track record or one still waiting to demonstrate its value?
Edge: Counter
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing a straightforward, easy-to-use system with proven operational features, go with Counter. Its high review count and recent positive feedback confirm its effectiveness in simplifying daily tasks, from reservations to housekeeping.
If your hotel requires a more complex, integrated system that can handle inventory, billing, and front-desk operations in a unified platform, Desbravador's promise of a comprehensive PMS might appeal. However, without user reviews or real-world testing, its performance remains uncertain. For certainty and proven results, Counter is the better option.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.6/5, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick staff onboarding (4.7/5). Reviews mention that staff can learn the platform rapidly, and management can operate it remotely through its mobile-friendly design.
Desbravador offers no user ratings or feedback on usability, making it impossible to evaluate its interface or onboarding experience. Given Counter’s clear positive reviews and high usability score, it is the easier system to adopt and operate confidently.
Edge: Counter
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audits, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features directly address operational needs of small hotels and hostels, providing a full suite to run daily operations effectively.
Desbravador’s feature set remains unreviewed and unspecified, making it impossible to compare directly. Counter’s established feature set and proven usability give it the edge for properties seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s support team is rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers highlighting their responsiveness and professionalism. Specific praise mentions team members like Evelyn and Max for quick, helpful responses, even during system bugs.
Desbravador offers no review data on customer support, support quality, or onboarding. Without verified feedback, Counter’s support remains the safer choice for hotels requiring dependable assistance.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations streamline reservations, payments, and access control, adding flexibility to your operations.
Desbravador has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its ability to connect with other essential systems. Counter’s broader integration ecosystem makes it the more versatile choice.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 is based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness and support. Hostels and independent properties rate it highly, with a 4.75/5 average for hostel properties.
Desbravador has no reviews or ratings, so no hoteliers have expressed satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Based on available data, Counter is clearly favored by property owners.
Edge: Counter
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing details but offers a free version and flexible integrations, indicating a potentially scalable pricing model. Desbravador’s pricing information is unavailable, suggesting it may be custom or still in development.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Desbravador, and Counter’s proven value through positive reviews, Counter is likely the more cost-effective choice with known ROI.
Edge: Counter
Not ideal if your property requires a highly customizable, enterprise-level PMS with advanced revenue management or complex inventory needs.
Not ideal if you require proven support, extensive integrations, or are hesitant to adopt a platform without user reviews or market presence.
Counter is an established, review-backed PMS designed specifically for hostels and smaller hotels, with proven features and high customer satisfaction. Its broad integration options and positive feedback make it a reliable choice for properties that want a trusted, feature-rich system.
Desbravador, while promising a comprehensive solution, remains untested in the market, with no reviews or verified performance data. It may appeal to hotels looking for a new platform, but without proven success, it carries more risk.
For most hotels and hostels seeking certainty and proven value, Counter is the clear winner. Its recent reviews, extensive feature set, and strong support network provide peace of mind and operational confidence. If your property values a tested, highly rated platform, Counter is the recommended choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Desbravador |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Desbravador 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Desbravador |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Desbravador 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Desbravador 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Desbravador:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Desbravador 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问