The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,304 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Counter 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
价格
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Counter hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a full-scale, integrated platform suitable for a diverse range of properties, while Counter is tailored for hostels seeking simplicity and mobility. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but their approaches and feature sets differ significantly.
Cloudbeds provides a comprehensive, feature-rich environment with extensive integrations, while Counter emphasizes ease of use, affordability, and mobility for hostel operators. Which system aligns better with your property’s needs and future plans?
Both Cloudbeds and Counter address the core challenge of managing reservations, check-ins, and guest data efficiently. Cloudbeds, with its 19 shared features and 45 unique offerings, aims to unify operations across multiple departments, making it ideal for properties with complex needs. Counter, on the other hand, focuses on streamlining daily hostel operations with an intuitive interface and automatic processes.
Where Cloudbeds caters to mid-sized and larger properties with its extensive feature set and integrations, Counter is designed for hostels and small properties emphasizing quick onboarding and mobile management. Do your operational needs lean toward an all-in-one management ecosystem or a straightforward, mobile-first system?
If your hotel requires advanced revenue management, extensive channel distribution, and deep customization, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its 190 verified partners and features like analytics dashboards, online check-in, and integrated CRS support growth and complex operations.
If your property is a hostel or small inn looking for simple, fast-to-deploy management with mobile accessibility, Counter is ideal. Its clean interface, free pricing, and focus on automation help reduce manual work with minimal setup. Are you prioritizing growth and scalable features or simplicity and cost-efficiency?
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, praised for its intuitive interface and streamlined onboarding process, although some users note occasional setup challenges. The platform’s mobile app receives positive feedback, but a few mention sluggishness during peak hours.
Counter is rated 4.6/5, with users emphasizing its straightforward, mobile-friendly interface that requires minimal training. Its minimal learning curve, especially for hostel staff, makes daily operations more manageable.
Edge: Counter.
Cloudbeds boasts 19 shared features plus 45 exclusive tools, including PMS connectivity, revenue management, online check-in, digital registration, and guest messaging. Its extensive suite supports multi-property management, automated reminders, task management, and more—features crucial for larger or multi-location hotels.
Counter offers essential features tailored for hostels, such as contactless check-in, automatic payments, POS integration, and bed availability management. While it lacks many advanced tools found in Cloudbeds, its simplicity accelerates onboarding and daily use.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support rating is 4.41/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, especially during onboarding, but some mention delays during peak times. Customers appreciate prompt assistance but note that support can sometimes be inconsistent.
Counter’s customer support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting its quick, helpful responses and dedicated team members like Evelyn and Max. Despite some slower responses in certain regions, users consistently praise the team's professionalism.
Edge: Counter.
Cloudbeds integrates with 190 verified partners, including major OTA and payment platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Goki. Its open marketplace enables extensive customization and integration with third-party systems.
Counter connects with seven verified partners, including Stripe, Goki, and POS systems. While its integrations cover key operational needs, the smaller ecosystem limits connectivity options compared to Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a review count of 1,071, with recent reviews (81 in the last 6 months) emphasizing its role in increasing revenue, simplifying operations, and enabling growth. Hotels of all segments, from boutique to resorts, rate it an average of 4.63/5.
Counter, with 54 reviews and no recent feedback, maintains a very high overall rating of 4.73/5. Hostels especially appreciate its simplicity, responsiveness, and ease of management. Given the recency and volume of Cloudbeds reviews, it’s the more strongly supported choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free plan or trial available, making it a significant investment suitable for properties seeking a robust platform. Its pricing reflects its extensive feature set and integrations.
Counter is free to use, with no setup or monthly fees, making it ideal for budget-conscious hostels and small properties. Additional costs may arise from integrations or add-ons, but the base system remains accessible.
Edge: Counter.
Not ideal if your property is small, budget-sensitive, or prioritizes minimal tech with straightforward daily operations.
Not ideal if your property requires complex revenue management, extensive integrations, or multi-property oversight.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS designed for hotels and multi-property operators seeking scalability, deep integrations, and data-driven decision tools. Its extensive ecosystem and proven track record make it suitable for properties with growth ambitions and complex needs.
Counter excels as a streamlined, easy-to-use platform tailored for hostels and small properties prioritizing simplicity, affordability, and mobile management. Its free model and automation features offer quick setup and operational efficiency, especially for budget-conscious operators.
In sum, if your hotel aims to grow and diversify operations, Cloudbeds is the stronger choice. Conversely, if you prioritize straightforward management and minimal costs, Counter is the better fit. Your decision should balance your current needs with your future growth plans.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问