The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 944 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #32 2 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #31 1 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 4 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Counter and Mews aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they serve different hotel profiles and expectations. Counter, designed specifically for hostels, offers simplicity and affordability, while Mews caters to a broader range of properties with more advanced features and integrations. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s size and growth plans?
Counter is the newer, more affordable option with a focus on ease of use, especially for hostels and small properties. Mews, with its larger ecosystem and extensive integrations, is better suited for hotels seeking scalability, automation, and a robust tech ecosystem. Are you prioritizing simplicity or advanced automation?
Counter is a free, user-friendly PMS built exclusively for hostels, with a straightforward interface ideal for small teams managing limited properties. Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform with a comprehensive feature set designed to support independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains with multiple locations.
Counter’s review count of 54 over the past few years indicates a smaller, but dedicated user base, mostly in Europe and North America, with recent reviews in the last six months. Mews, with 758 reviews and 98 recent ones, demonstrates a large and active community, especially among boutique and branded hotels.
Hoteliers value Counter for its simplicity, quick onboarding, and dedicated hostel focus. Mews is praised for its extensive automation, versatility, and global presence. If your hotel needs a straightforward PMS for a small operation, Counter might suffice. If you require a scalable, feature-rich platform with integrations and advanced tools, Mews is the more reliable choice.
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel operates predominantly as a hostel, budget accommodation, or small boutique, Counter's easy setup, and zero-cost model make it a compelling choice. Its intuitive interface and mobile accessibility help staff onboard quickly and manage reservations efficiently. Conversely, if your property is mid-sized or larger, with multiple locations or complex operations, Mews’ extensive features—over 40 exclusive functionalities—will serve you better.
Counter excels for hostel owners needing rapid deployment and minimal technical fuss. Mews suits hotels looking to automate processes, customize workflows, and integrate with over 1,000 external solutions via its open API. For scalability and advanced revenue management, Mews’s tools are unmatched.
Choose Counter if you prioritize simplicity and affordability. Opt for Mews if your focus is growth, automation, and a comprehensive tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews.
Counter’s UI has a review rating of 4.6/5, praised for its clean, simple, and mobile-friendly design—ideal for staff with limited tech experience. Its onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, with users citing quick training and straightforward daily management, especially in hostel environments.
Mews’s interface, rated 4.7/5, is modern and intuitive, with a focus on automating routine tasks. Its onboarding score of 4.39/5 reflects a slightly steeper learning curve but one that is offset by its extensive support resources and user-friendly design.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers core hostel management tools, such as reservations, check-ins, POS, and automatic payments—totaling around 19 shared features with Mews. However, it lacks advanced modules like guest CRM, multilingual support, revenue management, or integrated ID scanners.
Mews’s feature count surpasses 40, including multi-lingual, multi-currency, guest profiles, online check-in, digital registration, automated reminders, guest messaging, and more. Its marketplace allows the addition of functionalities like rate management, housekeeping apps, and real-time reporting—absent in Counter.
For basic operations, Counter’s features suffice. For a full-fledged hotel operation with automation and guest engagement, Mews’s richer feature set is the clear winner.
Edge: Mews.
Counter’s support is highly rated, with a score of 4.96/5, and reviews highlight fast, responsive assistance from dedicated team members like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers appreciate their helpfulness, even amid system bugs affecting overbookings and bed display.
Mews’s support score of 4.27/5 is good but has some recent reviews mentioning bugs and occasional delays. However, many users commend Mews for its prompt bug resolution and ongoing platform updates.
Considering recent reviews and support ratings, Counter’s support is more consistently praised. But Mews’s active support ecosystem often resolves issues swiftly.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, GOKI, Cloudbeds, and WuBook, primarily serving its niche in hostel management. Its limited integrations restrict connectivity to essential channels and payment solutions.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including the likes of SiteMinder, Stripe, Criton, and Right Revenue. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable seamless connection to revenue management, guest engagement, POS, and channel partners.
For extensive connectivity and future-proofing, Mews’s integration ecosystem is far superior. Counter’s limited options suit small-scale operations with minimal external requirements.
Edge: Mews.
Counter’s reviews, though fewer, are highly positive, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 hostel-specific reviews. Users praise its ease of use, fast support, and suitability for small hostel management. Recent reviews are scarce, but the existing ones stress its simplicity.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 is based on 758 reviews, with a recent 98 reviews in the last 6 months. Hotels of various sizes, from boutique to chains, rate it highly for automation, flexibility, and support, despite some bugs.
Given the larger review base and recent feedback, Mews maintains a more current and positive reputation across diverse hotel types.
Edge: Mews.
Counter is a free, cloud-based PMS with no implementation or ongoing fees, making it ideal for small hostels or startups with limited budgets. It’s a cost-effective solution that emphasizes ease over extensive features.
Mews charges a monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or setup costs. Its pricing reflects its broad feature set and extensive integrations, suited for properties ready to invest in automation and growth.
If budget is a primary concern, Counter offers a no-cost option. For hotels seeking extensive features and support, Mews’s investment provides long-term value and scalability.
Edge: Counter, for affordability; Mews, for features.
Counter is perfect for small, straightforward operations that prioritize ease and affordability over extensive automation.
Mews suits hotels focused on growth, automation, and delivering a tech-driven guest experience.
Mews and Counter serve different hotel needs: Counter offers a simple, cost-effective solution tailored for hostels and small properties, while Mews provides a scalable, feature-rich platform for larger or growing hotels.
Choose Counter if your priorities are ease, affordability, and a quick setup. Mews is the better choice when automation, integrations, and scalability are critical to your hotel’s future.
For small hostels or startups, Counter delivers excellent value at no cost. For hotels eyeing expansion and operational sophistication, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and automation tools justify the investment.
In summary, if your hotel needs a straightforward PMS now, Counter fits well. But if you’re planning for growth and advanced guest experience, Mews is the more reliable, future-proof option.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问