项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 992 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Mews 用户则强调 易用性和直观界面, 客户支持与培训, 自动化与工作流程效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
易用性和直观界面
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
客户支持与培训
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
自动化与工作流程效率
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
集成与开放API
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
账单、发票与支付
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
多酒店和集团管理
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 28 条评价 | #3 363 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #48 4 条评价 | #1 386 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #34 2 条评价 | #2 80 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #28 1 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #33 16 条评价 | #2 505 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #5 238 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #2 181 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #1 139 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #8 110 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #1 714 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #17 4 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #30 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Counter and Mews aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they serve different hotel profiles and expectations. Counter, designed specifically for hostels, offers simplicity and affordability, while Mews caters to a broader range of properties with more advanced features and integrations. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s size and growth plans?
Counter is the newer, more affordable option with a focus on ease of use, especially for hostels and small properties. Mews, with its larger ecosystem and extensive integrations, is better suited for hotels seeking scalability, automation, and a robust tech ecosystem. Are you prioritizing simplicity or advanced automation?
Counter is a free, user-friendly PMS built exclusively for hostels, with a straightforward interface ideal for small teams managing limited properties. Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform with a comprehensive feature set designed to support independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains with multiple locations.
Counter’s review count of 54 over the past few years indicates a smaller, but dedicated user base, mostly in Europe and North America, with recent reviews in the last six months. Mews, with 758 reviews and 98 recent ones, demonstrates a large and active community, especially among boutique and branded hotels.
Hoteliers value Counter for its simplicity, quick onboarding, and dedicated hostel focus. Mews is praised for its extensive automation, versatility, and global presence. If your hotel needs a straightforward PMS for a small operation, Counter might suffice. If you require a scalable, feature-rich platform with integrations and advanced tools, Mews is the more reliable choice.
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel operates predominantly as a hostel, budget accommodation, or small boutique, Counter's easy setup, and zero-cost model make it a compelling choice. Its intuitive interface and mobile accessibility help staff onboard quickly and manage reservations efficiently. Conversely, if your property is mid-sized or larger, with multiple locations or complex operations, Mews’ extensive features—over 40 exclusive functionalities—will serve you better.
Counter excels for hostel owners needing rapid deployment and minimal technical fuss. Mews suits hotels looking to automate processes, customize workflows, and integrate with over 1,000 external solutions via its open API. For scalability and advanced revenue management, Mews’s tools are unmatched.
Choose Counter if you prioritize simplicity and affordability. Opt for Mews if your focus is growth, automation, and a comprehensive tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews.
Counter’s UI has a review rating of 4.6/5, praised for its clean, simple, and mobile-friendly design—ideal for staff with limited tech experience. Its onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, with users citing quick training and straightforward daily management, especially in hostel environments.
Mews’s interface, rated 4.7/5, is modern and intuitive, with a focus on automating routine tasks. Its onboarding score of 4.39/5 reflects a slightly steeper learning curve but one that is offset by its extensive support resources and user-friendly design.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers core hostel management tools, such as reservations, check-ins, POS, and automatic payments—totaling around 19 shared features with Mews. However, it lacks advanced modules like guest CRM, multilingual support, revenue management, or integrated ID scanners.
Mews’s feature count surpasses 40, including multi-lingual, multi-currency, guest profiles, online check-in, digital registration, automated reminders, guest messaging, and more. Its marketplace allows the addition of functionalities like rate management, housekeeping apps, and real-time reporting—absent in Counter.
For basic operations, Counter’s features suffice. For a full-fledged hotel operation with automation and guest engagement, Mews’s richer feature set is the clear winner.
Edge: Mews.
Counter’s support is highly rated, with a score of 4.96/5, and reviews highlight fast, responsive assistance from dedicated team members like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers appreciate their helpfulness, even amid system bugs affecting overbookings and bed display.
Mews’s support score of 4.27/5 is good but has some recent reviews mentioning bugs and occasional delays. However, many users commend Mews for its prompt bug resolution and ongoing platform updates.
Considering recent reviews and support ratings, Counter’s support is more consistently praised. But Mews’s active support ecosystem often resolves issues swiftly.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, GOKI, Cloudbeds, and WuBook, primarily serving its niche in hostel management. Its limited integrations restrict connectivity to essential channels and payment solutions.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including the likes of SiteMinder, Stripe, Criton, and Right Revenue. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable seamless connection to revenue management, guest engagement, POS, and channel partners.
For extensive connectivity and future-proofing, Mews’s integration ecosystem is far superior. Counter’s limited options suit small-scale operations with minimal external requirements.
Edge: Mews.
Counter’s reviews, though fewer, are highly positive, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 hostel-specific reviews. Users praise its ease of use, fast support, and suitability for small hostel management. Recent reviews are scarce, but the existing ones stress its simplicity.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 is based on 758 reviews, with a recent 98 reviews in the last 6 months. Hotels of various sizes, from boutique to chains, rate it highly for automation, flexibility, and support, despite some bugs.
Given the larger review base and recent feedback, Mews maintains a more current and positive reputation across diverse hotel types.
Edge: Mews.
Counter is a free, cloud-based PMS with no implementation or ongoing fees, making it ideal for small hostels or startups with limited budgets. It’s a cost-effective solution that emphasizes ease over extensive features.
Mews charges a monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or setup costs. Its pricing reflects its broad feature set and extensive integrations, suited for properties ready to invest in automation and growth.
If budget is a primary concern, Counter offers a no-cost option. For hotels seeking extensive features and support, Mews’s investment provides long-term value and scalability.
Edge: Counter, for affordability; Mews, for features.
Counter is perfect for small, straightforward operations that prioritize ease and affordability over extensive automation.
Mews suits hotels focused on growth, automation, and delivering a tech-driven guest experience.
Mews and Counter serve different hotel needs: Counter offers a simple, cost-effective solution tailored for hostels and small properties, while Mews provides a scalable, feature-rich platform for larger or growing hotels.
Choose Counter if your priorities are ease, affordability, and a quick setup. Mews is the better choice when automation, integrations, and scalability are critical to your hotel’s future.
For small hostels or startups, Counter delivers excellent value at no cost. For hotels eyeing expansion and operational sophistication, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and automation tools justify the investment.
In summary, if your hotel needs a straightforward PMS now, Counter fits well. But if you’re planning for growth and advanced guest experience, Mews is the more reliable, future-proof option.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了... 最一致的积极评价是 Mews 对酒店团队来说易于学习和使用,具有清晰、现代的界面,帮助新员工快速实现生产力。评论者经常提到,简洁的布局减少了点击次数,加快了日常工作流程,并使前台和运营团队的培训变得更容易。
用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解... 用户常常称赞 Mews 支持团队、客户经理和培训专家的响应速度和帮助程度,尤其是在实施和变革管理期间。同时,这也是一个反复被提及的批评点:一些评价提到工单解决缓慢、支持方式过于聊天化,或培训内容对复杂酒店配置来说过于通用。
用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动... 用户通常表示 Mews 能减少预订、支付、邮件、入住/退房和客房服务等方面的重复行政工作。酒店重视节省的时间,因为团队可以将更多精力放在客人身上,而减少手动操作,尤其在高峰期。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单... 账单和支付处理是讨论最频繁的领域之一,许多用户称赞自动支付、房费收费和支付链接。然而,这也是一个常见的痛点:评论者经常提到退款处理、发票更正、拆分账单、对账以及公司账单等操作复杂或不够直观。
报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到... 报告被广泛重视,因为它能让管理者了解入住率、收入和运营趋势,但许多用户希望有更多的自定义、更好的筛选功能,以及报告之间更可靠的一致性。几位评审特别提到商业智能、分析仪表盘和导出选项是 Mews 可以更好支持数据驱动决策的方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 15,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐