The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
dihotel |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
dihotel |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
dihotel |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel, the key considerations are ease of use, features, support, and market presence. Counter by Counter offers a robust, feature-rich solution with a proven track record, while dihotel by dihotel appears to lack recent user reviews and detailed feature data. Given the current data, which PMS best suits your hotel’s needs?
Counter’s high ratings across multiple categories, especially support and usability, make it stand out. dihotel’s limited information and absence of recent reviews suggest it’s a less proven option. Should you prioritize a reliable, well-reviewed platform with extensive features? Or are you willing to explore a less tested alternative?
Counter by Counter is designed specifically for hostels, boasting a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 recent reviews, with notable praise for ease of use and customer support. It offers a comprehensive suite of features, including channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and automated night audits, all in a cloud-based platform. Customers frequently highlight its intuitive interface and the ability to manage operations remotely, making it ideal for dynamic hostel environments.
In contrast, dihotel by dihotel provides limited publicly available data, with no recent reviews or detailed feature list. Its market presence appears nonexistent outside the hotel industry, and without recent user feedback, it’s difficult to gauge its reliability or feature set. This lack of recent reviews and verified integrations puts dihotel at a disadvantage when compared to Counter’s proven track record.
Are you prepared to choose a platform with verified features, extensive customer feedback, and ongoing support? Or are you considering an untested alternative with no recent user insights?
If your hotel operates as a hostel, prioritizing ease of use, support, and integrated operational features, Counter is the clear choice. Its 4.73/5 rating and 54 reviews in the last six months indicate active, satisfied users who praise its user-friendly interface and support responsiveness.
If your hotel is a larger or more complex operation seeking a comprehensive PMS with automation and revenue management features, Counter’s feature set surpasses dihotel’s lack of available data. Conversely, if your hotel has very minimal needs or prefers a less expensive, less proven system, dihotel’s unclear offering might be considered — though this approach is riskier given current information gaps.
For most hotels, especially those in the hostel segment, Counter provides the reliability and features needed to run daily operations smoothly. If you need a proven, feature-rich product with recent reviews, Counter is the safe choice.
Counter’s UI consistently receives high praise, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews. Users describe it as straightforward, intuitive, and quick to learn, with onboarding rated at 4.7/5, making staff adoption smoother. The platform works well on mobile browsers, allowing management on the go, which is critical for hostel managers and multi-property operators.
In comparison, dihotel offers no recent reviews or detailed feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its absence from recent review data indicates it may lack the user-centric design and proven onboarding process Counter provides.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-lingual support—many of which are critical for efficient hostel management. The platform also supports group bookings, ancillary revenue tracking, and centralized user management, covering comprehensive operational needs.
dihotel’s feature set remains unlisted and unreviewed publicly, with no indication of specific tools or integrations. Without verified features or recent user feedback, it’s difficult to compare or determine its capability to meet your hotel’s operational demands.
Edge: Counter.
Customer support at Counter is highly rated, with a 4.96/5 rating based on recent reviews. Users frequently mention responsive, helpful support teams, with specific praise for staff like Evelyn and Max. Support availability, quick response times, and proactive assistance are recurring themes in recent feedback.
Dihotel provides no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service reputation unclear. The lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its post-sale support, especially important when operational issues arise.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers integrations with seven verified partners, including Channel Manager WuBook, Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and more. These integrations facilitate online booking management, payment processing, and access control, streamlining multiple operational facets.
dihotel provides no publicly listed or verified integrations, raising concerns about its ability to connect with existing tools or third-party platforms. The lack of verified integrations makes Counter the preferable choice for hotels seeking a connected, flexible PMS.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews reveal a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. It is particularly favored by hostel operators, who value its simplicity, support, and operational features.
dihotel has no recent reviews or rating data, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction or property-specific preferences. Without recent feedback, it cannot be considered a high-rated or trusted option.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly listed, but users report it being a paid platform with no freemium or free trial options. Its value proposition is supported by high support, ongoing updates, and feature availability.
dihotel’s pricing information is also unavailable, with no clear indication of whether it charges monthly, per room, or a flat fee. Given the lack of transparency and recent reviews, the actual cost and value are uncertain.
Counter by Counter provides a proven, highly-rated platform built specifically for hostels and small hotels, with solid features, active support, and recent user feedback. Its 54 reviews in the last six months and 4.73/5 rating demonstrate consistent satisfaction among users who value ease, automation, and integrations.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich PMS with high support quality and recent positive reviews, Counter is the smarter choice. Its extensive integrations and proven track record make it particularly suitable for properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Conversely, dihotel’s lack of recent reviews, verified features, and integrations make it a less attractive option unless your hotel has very minimal management needs and is comfortable with unproven solutions. Without clear evidence of performance and support, it’s hard to recommend dihotel over Counter for most hotels.
In summary, for most property types—especially hostels and small hotels—Counter offers a safer, more proven, and feature-complete platform. If reliability, support, and recent positive feedback are critical, go with Counter.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 dihotel 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 dihotel 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。dihotel:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,dihotel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问