The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When evaluating property management systems (PMS), your choice hinges on understanding which platform best addresses your hotel's operational needs. Counter by Counter, designed specifically for hostels, offers a broad set of features with a strong reputation, especially among hostels and small accommodations. Dormakaba Ilc by Dormakaba Kaba Ltd, on the other hand, has minimal recent reviews and a limited global presence, making it harder to assess its suitability. Do you prioritize a proven platform with active support or are you exploring lesser-known solutions?
Counter’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it the safer bet for most hotels. Dormakaba Kaba Ltd, with no recent reviews and a tiny user footprint, doesn’t currently provide enough data to compare effectively. Are you comfortable choosing a product with little recent evidence of performance?
Counter stands out as a comprehensive PMS built primarily for hostels but adaptable for other small-scale accommodations. It boasts a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, responsive support, and robust feature set. Users highlight its intuitive interface, mobile-friendly platform, and automation features like automated night audits and integrated POS.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd has no recent reviews or rating data, making it difficult to evaluate. Its limited market presence and minimal integration options suggest it might not meet the needs of hotels looking for a reliable, well-supported PMS. Given the lack of recent feedback, it’s hard to determine its current performance or user satisfaction.
Are you willing to bet on a system with no recent feedback, or do you prefer an actively reviewed product with proven results?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, feature-rich PMS with active support and proven reliability, go with Counter. It’s ideal for hostels, boutique hotels, and small properties wanting an intuitive system with automation options and extensive integrations. The platform’s focus on ease of use and automation helps streamline daily operations, reduce manual tasks, and improve guest experience.
If your hotel is seeking a solution from a vendor with limited market presence and no recent reviews, Dormakaba Kaba Ltd might be an option, but it’s risky without current feedback. It could suit a hotel willing to invest in a less-tested system or one already familiar with Dormakaba’s broader product ecosystem. However, for most hoteliers, the lack of recent data and limited integrations will be a significant drawback.
In summary, choose Counter for a reliable, well-reviewed system with active user support. Consider Dormakaba Kaba Ltd only if you have specific reasons to trust its vendor or if you’re testing new solutions without immediate operational needs.
Counter’s interface scores 4.6/5 and is praised for its clarity, simplicity, and mobile responsiveness. Reviewers consistently mention how easy it is to train staff and manage bookings remotely, with many noting that the system’s straightforward design reduces onboarding time. Customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with staff like Evelyn and Max frequently praised for prompt, helpful assistance.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to compare usability directly. The lack of recent user feedback suggests uncertainty about its current interface or onboarding experience.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, online booking engine, automated night audits, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are designed specifically to streamline hostel operations and are backed by active user feedback.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd provides no recent feature data or detailed descriptions, which raises questions about its current capabilities and focus. Without specific feature information, it’s impossible to compare effectively.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support system is highly praised, with a 4.96/5 rating based on recent reviews. Users mention fast, helpful responses and support staff like Evelyn and Max, who are praised for their professionalism. Some reviewers note that support can be slower outside certain time zones, but overall, responses are prompt and effective.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd does not have recent review data on support, support ratings, or user experiences. The absence of recent feedback indicates uncertainty about its current support quality.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including leading channel managers like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Stripe for payments. It also offers integrations with POS systems, access management via Goki, and other operational tools. These integrations help streamline booking, payment, and guest management processes.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd has only one verified integration partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, limiting its connectivity options. The small number of integrations could restrict your ability to connect with other systems and platforms.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews yield a 4.73/5 overall rating, with many hosts praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Hoteliers operating hostels and small hotels rate it highly, with an average score of 4.75/5 among hostel users.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd has no recent reviews, so there’s no current user rating or segment-specific feedback available. Without recent validation, it’s impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive its value or performance.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not disclose its pricing publicly but is offered on a subscription basis without a free tier or implementation fee. Its pricing model appears designed for small to mid-sized properties seeking affordable, flexible solutions.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd also does not publish detailed pricing info, which suggests that potential customers must contact sales directly.
In absence of specific costs, your decision may depend on conversations with sales teams and your budget considerations.
Not ideal if you require a PMS with extensive multi-property management, complex revenue management, or highly customizable features.
Not ideal if you need a proven, actively supported PMS with extensive features, integrations, and recent user feedback.
Counter is a fully-featured, well-reviewed PMS with active support and a proven track record among hoteliers, especially hostels. It simplifies daily operations, offers multiple integrations, and garners high satisfaction ratings, making it the clear choice for most small-to-medium hotels.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd, lacking recent reviews and a broad feature set, represents a higher risk option. It may suit properties already invested in Dormakaba solutions or testing new systems but isn't recommended for those prioritizing reliability and proven performance.
If your priority is a trusted, actively supported PMS with a comprehensive feature set and positive user feedback, Counter is the logical choice. Consider Dormakaba Kaba Ltd only if you have specific reasons to believe in its future performance or are exploring niche integrations.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest available reviews and data. Always engage with vendors directly to confirm current features, support options, and pricing before making a final decision.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 dormakaba Ilc 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 dormakaba Ilc 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 dormakaba Ilc 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。dormakaba Ilc:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问