The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
HIS MSC Company Limited 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 HIS MSC Company Limited 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that simplifies operations, offers reliable support, and integrates well with your existing tools. Counter by Counter and epitome PMS by HIS-MSC both aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in their market presence, reviews, and features. With Counter's active user base and recent positive reviews, it has become a trusted choice for hostels and small hotels. Does your property need a lightweight, flexible PMS, or a more traditional enterprise solution?
Counter is designed explicitly for hostels and smaller properties, focusing on ease of use and affordability. In contrast, HIS-MSC’s epitome PMS targets larger hotels and chains that require extensive management features and international support. If you want a straightforward platform with proven user satisfaction, Counter is the way to go. But if your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable system, HIS-MSC might be worth considering.
Counter by Counter is a cloud-based PMS built specifically for hostels, with features like channel management, booking engine, and guest CRM. Its focus on simplicity makes it ideal for small to mid-sized properties, especially hostels that prioritize ease of operation. HIS MSC’s epitome PMS, meanwhile, is a broader hospitality platform suitable for larger hotels or resort chains that need more complex functions like detailed reporting, multi-property management, and extensive integrations.
Counter’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.02/10) reflect its strong satisfaction among hostel operators, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and 54 reviews—all within the last six months. HIS MSC’s ratings are unavailable, and it has no recent reviews, indicating less current user engagement and confidence. Would your hotel benefit more from a niche solution or a full-scale enterprise system? Given the latest reviews, Counter’s solution is more validated today.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property, especially in regions like Europe, North America, or Asia Pacific, Counter’s comprehensive yet straightforward system should be your pick. Its 19 exclusive features—like automated night audits and multi-currency support—are tailored for hosts who want to streamline bookings and guest management without complexity. Conversely, if your hotel operates multiple large properties with a need for detailed analytics and custom workflows, HIS-MSC’s epitome PMS might fit better, although it currently lacks recent reviews to confirm its effectiveness.
Counter’s user base of 83% hostels and small hotels, combined with its high satisfaction scores, makes it a safe choice for properties that value usability and rapid implementation. HIS-MSC’s broader target market and lack of recent feedback make it less suitable unless your hotel requires enterprise-level features, which are not clearly documented here.
Counter’s interface scores 4.6/5 for ease of use, praised for its intuitive design that requires minimal training. Users highlight its mobile-friendly platform and simple calendar views, making management straightforward even remotely. The onboarding process, rated at 4.7/5, is noted for being smooth, with staff quickly adopting the platform, especially in hostel environments.
HIS-MSC’s interface and user experience are not rated or described in detail, leaving uncertainty about its ease of adoption. Given the clear positive feedback on Counter’s user friendliness and recent reviews emphasizing quick learning curves, it’s evident that Counter has a distinct advantage.
Edge: Counter
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, online booking engine, POS system, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are tailored to streamline hostel operations, especially for properties that need quick, efficient management tools.
HIS-MSC’s epitome PMS has no listed features or integrations in the comparison data, making it difficult to evaluate its capabilities. Without concrete feature data, Counter’s extensive feature set clearly stands out, especially for hostel owners seeking an all-in-one solution.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s support rating is exceptionally high at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and helpful staff, especially for quick problem resolution. Comments from users like “support is always there to help” and “Evelyn and Max are very professional” reinforce its reputation for excellent service.
HIS-MSC has no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its customer service quality unverified. When choosing a PMS, support quality is critical; Counter’s proven high ratings and positive feedback make it the safer bet.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, and Goki, facilitating seamless connectivity across booking channels, payment, and access control. This broad integration base helps streamline operations and revenue streams, especially for small properties.
HIS-MSC currently has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools. For properties that depend on a connected tech ecosystem, Counter’s integrations give it a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter
Counter has a rapidly growing review count of 54, with recent feedback reinforcing high satisfaction. Its overall rating of 4.73/5, based on recent reviews, shows strong approval across various hotel segments, especially hostels, which rate it 4.75/5.
HIS-MSC has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Given the active review community and recent positive feedback for Counter, it’s evident that hoteliers rate it higher today.
Edge: Counter
Both products do not specify publicly available pricing models. However, Counter is described as a free PMS tailored for hostels, which suggests a highly accessible entry point, especially for small operations. HIS-MSC’s pricing is not disclosed, but as a larger enterprise solution, it likely involves custom quotes and potentially higher costs suited for bigger hotels.
For small properties seeking affordability, Counter’s free model combined with its feature-rich offering makes it attractive. HIS-MSC’s costs are likely higher and more variable, fitting larger hotel operations with complex needs.
Counter excels in environments that value simplicity, quick setup, and reliable support, making it perfect for small-scale or startup hotels.
HIS-MSC is suitable for hospitality businesses with larger operational needs and resources for a potentially more complex implementation.
Counter by Counter offers an intuitive, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record among hostels and small hotels. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it a safe and reliable choice for properties that want simplicity and support.
HIS-MSC’s epitome PMS, while potentially powerful, currently lacks recent validation through reviews and detailed feature data. It’s more fitting for larger hotel groups with complex operational demands, but without recent feedback, its effectiveness remains uncertain.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property looking for an easy-to-use, well-supported PMS, Counter is the clear choice. For larger enterprises with sophisticated needs, consider HIS-MSC, but proceed with caution given the limited recent information.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,HIS MSC Company Limited 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问