Counter vs. Felix: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

GMS 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 Felix 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 Felix 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 GMS 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter GMS
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 GMS:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter GMS
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter GMS
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter GMS
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Felix by GMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Counter is a dedicated property management system (PMS) built primarily for hostels, offering an extensive feature set and a strong focus on daily operational management. Felix, on the other hand, is an AI-driven review and feedback analysis platform, not a full PMS, designed to help you interpret customer reviews and improve service.

Counter aims to streamline your front desk, reservations, and guest management, while Felix focuses on extracting insights from reviews to guide service improvements. Both serve different core functions—so which aligns better with your current priorities? Let’s compare their strengths and limitations.

Is Counter or Felix Better for Hotels?

Counter is a full-fledged PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with 54 detailed reviews in the last six months, indicating recent user feedback and ongoing development. Its high overall rating of 4.73/5 and a strong 91% likelihood of recommendation reflect its popularity among hostel operators. Customers praise its ease of use (4.6/5), excellent support (4.96/5), and value for money (4.8/5). Users mention that Counter simplifies daily operations, automates tasks like night audits, and offers features such as channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and guest CRM.

Felix, by contrast, does not function as a PMS but as an analytics platform specializing in review and customer feedback analysis. It is not rated on operational features but on its AI capabilities, making direct comparisons difficult. Felix’s primary utility is interpreting guest feedback to improve service quality. If your hotel needs a robust PMS to manage reservations, check-ins, and daily operations, Counter is the clear choice. Does your team need operational tools or review insights?

Counter vs Felix: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel requires a comprehensive property management system to handle bookings, room management, invoicing, and channel integrations, Counter is the right pick. It is especially suitable if you operate a hostel or small hotel with a high volume of reservations and need features like group bookings, automated night audits, and multi-currency support. Its recent reviews highlight user satisfaction with its interface and support, making it ideal for daily operations.

Felix should be your choice if your focus is on understanding and acting upon guest reviews, especially if reputation management or online presence is critical. It’s better suited for hotels that already have a PMS in place but want advanced review analysis to improve guest experiences and drive positive feedback. If your priority lies in reputation and customer insights rather than operational management, Felix is the better fit.

In summary, for operational excellence and booking management, go with Counter. For review analysis and improving guest satisfaction through feedback insights, Felix is the way to go.

Is Counter or Felix Easier to Use?

Counter boasts an impressive ease-of-use score of 4.6/5 and a user-friendly interface praised for its simplicity and intuitive navigation. Users report quick onboarding, with an average onboarding rating of 4.7/5, and commend the system’s mobile-friendly design that allows management on the go. Support staff, notably Evelyn and Max, are frequently highlighted for their responsiveness, further easing staff adoption despite some bugs reported in the system.

Felix, however, is not rated for usability as a PMS because it doesn’t offer operational management features. Its interface is designed for review analysis, which may require some learning for hotel staff unfamiliar with data interpretation. Since Felix isn’t a property management tool, ease of use is less about operational workflows and more about navigating review data and insights. But for your hotel team managing reservations and front desk tasks, Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Felix?

Counter’s feature set is extensive, with 19 unique capabilities that directly impact daily hotel operations. These include a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audits, guest CRM, multi-currency support, group booking management, and ancillary revenue tracking. Its integrated house-keeping module and centralized user management also facilitate smooth operational control.

Felix offers no standalone features for reservations, property management, or direct hotel operations. Instead, it provides AI-driven review summaries and tailored recommendations based on customer feedback. While this can be invaluable for reputation management, it lacks the operational tools Counter provides. Therefore, for features that directly modify or manage guest stays, Counter holds the advantage. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Felix?

Counter’s support team, rated at 4.96/5, is frequently praised for quick, effective responses. Multiple reviews mention support staff like Evelyn and Max for their professionalism and helpfulness, often resolving issues within minutes. The onboarding process is rated at 4.7/5, reflecting a generally smooth experience in adopting the system.

Felix, by contrast, has no publicly available reviews on support or onboarding since it functions mainly as an analytics tool rather than a customer-facing PMS. Its support experience is less transparent, and given that it is not a full PMS, its user support is likely more limited. For your hotel’s operational needs, Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Felix?

Counter boasts integration with 7 verified partners, including notable platforms like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, WuBook, Goki, and FLYR Hospitality. These integrations streamline booking, payments, and access management, expanding your hotel’s connectivity and operational flexibility. Many users appreciate how these partnerships simplify daily workflows and revenue streams.

Felix reports zero verified integrations, as it functions primarily as a review analysis platform. It can connect with review sites and social media channels but does not directly integrate with PMS or channel management platforms. If seamless connectivity with booking and revenue systems is critical, Counter’s integrations give it a clear edge. Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Felix?

Based on recent reviews, Counter’s satisfaction rating of 4.73/5 and the 91% likelihood of recommendation indicate strong hotelier approval. Its user base, predominantly hostels and small hotels, particularly in Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific, values its ease of use and operational features.

Felix lacks published user ratings and reviews, making it impossible to compare satisfaction levels directly. Since the primary users of Felix are likely larger hotels or hospitality groups focused on review management, the score is less relevant. For your hotel, Hoteliers rate Counter higher by a wide margin. Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Felix Cost?

Counter does not publicly detail its pricing but emphasizes no implementation fees and a straightforward, flat subscription model. A free tier is not available, but users find its value justified given the feature set and support.

Felix’s pricing details are also unavailable openly, as it’s a SaaS platform focused on review analysis. It is likely offered on a subscription basis, but specifics are not posted. Since both products lack transparent pricing, your decision should consider the value gained from features and support rather than cost alone.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate hostels, small hotels, or inns with high reservation volumes.
  • Teams needing an all-in-one platform to manage bookings, guest profiles, and payments.
  • Properties looking for automation tools like night audits and channel management.
  • Hotels that prioritize ease of use, fast onboarding, and responsive support.
  • Small to medium properties seeking multi-currency and multi-lingual capabilities.
  • Not ideal if you require advanced revenue management or complex group booking features.
  • Not suitable if your hotel relies heavily on bespoke customization or high-level integrations outside the existing partner network.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Felix?

  • Hotels that already have a PMS and need advanced review and reputation management.
  • Teams focused on improving guest satisfaction through detailed feedback analysis.
  • Properties with a significant online presence where reviews influence bookings.
  • Hotels wanting tailored insights and actionable recommendations from customer feedback.
  • Larger hotel chains looking to refine customer service strategies at scale.
  • Not ideal if you need operational tools for reservations, check-ins, or daily management.
  • Not suitable if your focus is on revenue management or direct booking tools without review analysis.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter by Counter provides a comprehensive property management system, with a strong focus on hostels and small hotels. It delivers a broad feature set, excellent support, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for operational management and daily hotel functions.

Felix by GMS offers valuable review insights but does not replace a PMS or operational platform. It’s best suited for hotels that want to deepen their understanding of customer feedback rather than manage reservations or automate front desk operations.

If your priority is running your hotel smoothly and efficiently, Counter is the clear choice. For reputation and review strategy enhancement, Felix offers complementary benefits but is not a substitute for a PMS.

Ultimately, for your hotel’s operational success, Counter’s recent reviews, high ratings, and feature depth make it the more reliable, well-rounded solution.

Counter 和 Felix 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter GMS

Counter 有哪些 Felix 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Felix 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter GMS
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 GMS:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
GMS
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 Felix 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 Felix?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Felix 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Felix 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 Felix 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。Felix:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 Felix?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,GMS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息