The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Flyhotel by Flyhotel comes down to what your hotel needs most. Counter, with its extensive features and strong user feedback, is a proven option for hostels and small hotels seeking reliable management tools. Flyhotel, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive platform but currently lacks reviews, user ratings, and recent data, making it difficult to assess its suitability.
Counter's 54 recent reviews over the past six months, combined with a high overall rating of 4.73/5, establish it as a trusted choice. Flyhotel, with zero reviews and no recent activity, remains an unproven contender. Are you comfortable taking a chance on an emerging platform or do you prefer a well-documented, community-tested solution?
Counter and Flyhotel aim to streamline hotel operations but differ significantly in maturity and features. Counter, launched in 2019, has developed a robust, multi-region presence with features like channel management, booking engine, and guest CRM, primarily serving hostels with 83% of its users. Its reviews highlight ease of use, fast support, and automation, although bugs with bookings and overbookings persist.
Flyhotel, lacking reviews and user data, claims to be a comprehensive PMS but offers no detailed feature list or customer feedback. Its absence of verified integrations and regional presence raises questions about its operational reliability. Does your hotel prioritize proven stability or are you open to newer, less tested solutions?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, reliable PMS with proven support and broad integration options, go with Counter. Its 19 unique features—including channel management, online booking, automated night audits, and guest CRM—are backed by extensive positive reviews. It’s especially suitable for hostels and small hotels looking for an all-in-one system.
If your hotel is seeking a scalable, cloud-based platform with AI-driven insights (based on Flyhotel's claims), and you’re willing to test a less proven product, Flyhotel might appeal. However, without reviews or case studies, it’s hard to justify choosing Flyhotel over Counter at this stage.
Counter boasts a high ease of use rating of 4.6/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile accessibility. Support from its team is also highly rated, with specific praise for responsiveness from staff like Evelyn and Max.
Flyhotel’s ease of use is unverified due to a lack of reviews or user feedback. Without concrete data, we can’t determine whether it offers a user-friendly experience comparable to Counter. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 exclusive features, including a comprehensive channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency and multilingual support, and group booking management. These features are well-documented and praised in reviews for their utility and stability.
Flyhotel’s feature set remains unverified, with no publicly available details or user testimonials. Its claims of providing a full suite of hotel management tools are unsubstantiated at this point. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team scores a remarkable 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Customers appreciate support responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Flyhotel’s support quality is unknown due to no reviews or customer feedback. Without user ratings or testimonials, we cannot assess the quality or responsiveness of its support. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations enhance operational flexibility and expand distribution channels.
Flyhotel has no verified integrations listed, and no partner network data is available. This limits its appeal for hotels needing seamless connectivity. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s rating of 4.73/5 is supported by 54 reviews, most recent reviews praising ease of use, support, and automation. Its core user base—primarily hostels—gives it a clear track record of satisfaction.
Flyhotel, with no reviews, does not have any ratings or recent feedback to evaluate. Its lack of user data makes it impossible to determine hoteliers’ preferences. Edge: Counter.
Counter's pricing information is not publicly disclosed; it is a paid system with no trial or freemium model mentioned. Flyhotel also provides no pricing details, making direct comparison impossible.
Both platforms seem to lack transparent pricing, so consider reaching out for custom quotes or demos before making a decision.
Not ideal if your property operates in a niche that demands highly specialized or niche software not covered by Counter’s current feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a system with proven stability, extensive integrations, or robust user support, given the current lack of publicly available review data.
Counter by Counter functions as a stable, well-reviewed PMS with extensive functionalities tailored mainly for hostels and small hotels. Its proven track record, broad integration network, and high customer satisfaction make it a dependable choice.
Flyhotel presents itself as a comprehensive, AI-enhanced PMS but lacks the user reviews and recent activity needed to confidently recommend it. Its unproven status makes it a candidate for exploratory testing rather than a proven operational platform.
If you value reliability backed by user feedback and a solid feature set, Counter is the clear choice. Conversely, if you’re curious about emerging platforms with AI capabilities and are willing to accept some risk, Flyhotel could be worth investigating further.
In conclusion, for now, Counter remains the more confident, tested option for your hotel’s management needs.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Flyhotel 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Flyhotel 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Flyhotel:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Flyhotel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问