The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
GlobRes |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
GlobRes |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
GlobRes |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and GlobRes by GlobRes hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, size, and customer engagement priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its feature-rich, user-friendly interface make it stand out, especially given its recent, extensive reviews. GlobRes, while comprehensive, lacks recent review data and a visible market presence, which impacts confidence in its current support and development status.
Counter’s strong review count (54 reviews in the last six months) and high ratings across ease of use, support, and value demonstrate its prominence in the market. GlobRes, however, offers a broad set of features but has zero recent reviews, making it hard to validate its current performance. So, which product truly aligns with your needs?
Counter excels at simplifying hostel management with its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface, and supports automation like online check-ins and payment processing. GlobRes offers an extensive feature set designed to serve larger hotels and resorts, including integrated reservation management and customizable reports, but lacks recent user feedback that confirms current functionality.
Counter’s recent reviews highlight high satisfaction with its ease of use, quick customer support, and efficient onboarding, especially for hostel operators. Conversely, GlobRes has no recent reviews, and its support and feature efficacy are unverified, which presents a risk for hoteliers seeking reliability.
Do you need a proven, user-tested system for hostels or small properties? Or are you looking for a larger-scale system with broad features but less recent validation?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small boutique property, Counter is the clear choice. It’s built for simplicity, fast onboarding, and rapid support response, making daily management straightforward. If, however, your property is a large hotel, resort, or vacation rental with complex needs and advanced reporting requirements, GlobRes’s extensive features might seem appealing, but the lack of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support and updates.
Counter’s ease of use, positive customer support, and extensive integrations (like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Channel Manager) are backed by recent reviews. GlobRes, despite its broad capabilities, lacks recent validation, making it a less reliable option for current needs.
Counter boasts a high user-friendliness score (4.6/5), with reviews praising its clean, simple interface and quick staff onboarding. Many users find it easy to train staff and manage daily tasks from mobile devices, making it ideal for busy hostel environments.
GlobRes’s user experience is unverified due to the absence of current reviews. Its interface and onboarding process are not documented in recent feedback, leaving uncertainty about ease of adoption.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including channel management, payment processing, a booking engine, housekeepings modules, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. It also provides automation tools like night audits and integrated POS, specifically tailored for small to medium-sized properties.
GlobRes does not list specific features in the available data, but as a comprehensive PMS, it presumably covers reservations, front desk operations, and administrative management. However, without recent feature validation, its practical advantages remain uncertain.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support receives high praise, with a 4.96/5 rating and reviews lauding its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate quick issue resolution and proactive onboarding, though some note slower responses in certain time zones.
GlobRes offers no recent reviews or evident customer support ratings. Its current support quality and responsiveness are unverified, which may pose challenges if issues arise.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major platforms like Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki. These integrations facilitate smooth booking, payment, and access management, expanding your operational options.
GlobRes shows no verified integrations or partner connections in the data, limiting its current connectivity options. This reduces its utility in a multi-platform environment.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews reflect an overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 54 reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hostels and small properties rate it particularly highly, with an average of 4.75/5.
GlobRes has no recent reviews, preventing an accurate comparison. Its reputation and user satisfaction remain uncertain, especially for current market conditions.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly available; it does not offer a free plan or trial, which suggests a paid, possibly tiered model. GlobRes also lacks transparent pricing information, making direct comparison difficult.
Both products appear to operate on custom quotes, typical for enterprise systems, but specific costs are not disclosed.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter’s standout feature is its proven, recent user satisfaction across small to medium properties, especially hostels. Its extensive feature set, ease of use, and reliable support make it the pragmatic choice for most hoteliers in this segment, despite some bugs.
GlobRes offers a broad suite of capabilities for larger, complex properties, but the lack of recent reviews and validated support makes it a risky pick for current needs. Unless your property is ready to deploy a system without recent user feedback, Counter provides a safer, more proven option.
If your hotel values ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, Counter is the clear winner. It’s better suited for properties that need reliable, day-to-day management tools with proven performance. Conversely, if you require a broad feature set for a large property, and can verify GlobRes’s current support status, it might be worth exploring further, but caution is advised.
In conclusion, for most properties, especially hostels and small hotels, Counter’s recent reviews and high ratings make it the recommended choice. It offers a balance of features, support, and user satisfaction that’s difficult to match without current data on GlobRes.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 GlobRes 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GlobRes 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。GlobRes:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,GlobRes 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问