Counter vs. GMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

GMS Felix 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 GMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 GMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 GMS Felix 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter GMS Felix
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 GMS Felix:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter GMS Felix
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter GMS Felix
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter GMS Felix
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Counter by Counter and GMS Felix aim to address distinct needs within property management, but they serve very different segments. Counter is a user-friendly, dedicated PMS for hostels, while GMS Felix offers a broad, enterprise-level solution for more complex property portfolios. Which system better aligns with your hotel’s scale and operational complexity?

Counter boasts a strong reputation among hostel operators, with more recent reviews and a higher review count than GMS Felix. Conversely, GMS Felix remains less reviewed and has no recent customer feedback, making Counter the more reliable choice for current hotel management needs.

Is Counter by Counter or GMS Felix Better for Hotels?

Counter is designed explicitly for hostel owners and small to medium-sized accommodations, offering an intuitive interface that minimizes staff training time. GMS Felix claims to be a comprehensive property management system but lacks recent reviews or user feedback, which raises questions about its current market presence and usability.

Counter’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating from 54 reviews, and a customer support score of 4.96/5. GMS Felix, on the other hand, has no available recent data or user ratings, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or customer satisfaction. Would you prefer a system with proven performance and active user feedback?

Counter vs GMS Felix: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel operates as a hostel or small guesthouse, Counter is the clear choice, thanks to its dedicated features like channel management, booking engine, and automated night audits tailored specifically for hostels. It’s especially advantageous if you need a mobile-friendly system with strong support and automation to handle high guest turnover efficiently.

For larger, multi-property hotel groups or complex property portfolios, GMS Felix might seem appealing due to its broad scope. However, with no recent reviews or documented features, Counter’s focused approach and extensive user feedback make it the safer, more evidence-backed option. The decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific operational needs.

Is Counter or GMS Felix Easier to Use?

Based on current data, Counter excels in usability, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating from 54 recent reviews. Hoteliers praise its simple, clean interface, and quick staff onboarding, emphasizing its mobile compatibility for management on the go. In contrast, GMS Felix lacks recent reviews and any explicit usability ratings, raising concerns about its current user experience.

Counter’s user-friendly design and responsive onboarding process make it accessible for staff at all levels, reducing training time and operational disruption. GMS Felix’s absence of recent feedback makes it impossible to determine its ease of use. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or GMS Felix?

Counter offers 19 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. It also integrates with popular partners like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds, enhancing your operational capacity.

GMS Felix presents no documented features or integrations, and its feature count is zero in available data. Without concrete functionality details or recent reviews, Counter’s feature set clearly outmatches GMS Felix. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or GMS Felix?

Counter’s customer support scores a remarkable 4.96/5, with numerous reviews highlighting quick, helpful, and professional assistance. Reviewers like "Evelyn and Max are always responsive and helpful" reinforce its reputation for excellent support.

GMS Felix has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given current data, Counter’s proven customer service is a significant advantage. Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or GMS Felix?

Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including channel managers like SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, and payment platforms like Stripe. These integrations allow your property to connect with multiple OTAs and financial tools, streamlining operations.

GMS Felix has no verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity options. For hotels relying on multi-platform integrations, Counter is the clear leader. Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or GMS Felix?

Counter enjoys a high overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. It’s particularly valued by hostel operators, who frequently praise its ease of use, support, and automation features.

GMS Felix’s ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews exist to suggest user satisfaction levels. Given the extensive positive feedback for Counter, it clearly holds the customer preference. Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and GMS Felix Cost?

Counter does not disclose specific pricing but offers a transparent, monthly flat fee structure without implementation or setup costs—suggesting affordability for small to midsize hostels. GMS Felix’s pricing is also undisclosed, and the absence of recent customer feedback complicates pricing expectations.

Given the lack of transparent cost details, your best approach is to request a quote from each provider; however, Counter’s proven value and known pricing model make it easier to evaluate ROI.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate as hostels, guesthouses, or small inns seeking an intuitive, easy-to-implement PMS.
  • Teams that prioritize automation, such as night audits and POS integration, to reduce manual tasks.
  • Properties with a focus on mobile management to oversee operations remotely.
  • Hotels that want strong customer support and active user community feedback.

Not ideal if your hotel requires complex revenue management, advanced reporting, or multi-property support across multiple regions.

What Type of Hotel Should Use GMS Felix?

  • Larger hotel groups or property portfolios needing centralized management tools.
  • Teams that prioritize extensive customization or complex financial reporting.
  • Properties seeking a comprehensive, all-in-one platform with broad operational modules.
  • Hotels that prefer a system with proven, strong market presence and active customer reviews.

Not ideal if your hotel values ease of use, quick onboarding, or relies heavily on integrations, given the lack of recent data on GMS Felix.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter by Counter is a focused, easy-to-use PMS built specifically for hostels and small hotels, with active user reviews and a high satisfaction rate. Its feature set, support, and integrations make it a reliable choice for properties seeking operational efficiency.

GMS Felix appears to be a broader, more complex management platform, but its lack of recent reviews and documented features make it a risky choice unless you have specific, large-scale management needs and are willing to invest in a less proven system.

If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, active support, and proven features, Counter is the clear choice. For larger, multi-property management with extensive customization needs, GMS Felix might warrant further investigation, but current data favors Counter as the more dependable option.

Counter 和 GMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter GMS Felix

Counter 有哪些 GMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 GMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter GMS Felix
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 GMS Felix:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
GMS Felix
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 GMS 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 GMS?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 GMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 GMS 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。GMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 GMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,GMS Felix 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息