The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
GoldenUp |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
GoldenUp |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
GoldenUp |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system is critical for your hotel’s success, especially when evaluating options like Counter by Counter and GoldenUp by GoldenUp. Both aim to streamline operations and boost profitability but approach these goals differently. Counter is a dedicated PMS tailored for hostels with extensive features, whereas GoldenUp focuses on revenue optimization with AI-driven insights. Are you prioritizing operational efficiency or revenue growth?
Counter offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed for hostel and small hotel operators, with robust integrations and a proven track record. GoldenUp, on the other hand, provides advanced analytics but lacks a full PMS feature set. Does your property need an all-in-one management system or a specialized revenue tool?
Counter is a full-featured PMS with over 54 reviews and a high recent review count, giving it a noticeable edge in reliability and user feedback. It offers 19 exclusive features like channel management, booking engine, and housekeeper modules, which are essential for daily hotel operations. GoldenUp, however, has no reviews in the last six months and offers no features besides revenue management, limiting its scope.
Counter’s strengths lie in its ease of use, customer support, and regional presence across 29 countries, primarily serving hostels and small hotels. GoldenUp’s focus remains on data analysis and revenue insights, without a dedicated operational platform. Do you need an integrated PMS or a revenue-focused solution?
Edge: Counter.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system, go with Counter. It is well-suited for hostels, inns, and boutique hotels, especially those prioritizing operational features like booking management, POS, group bookings, and multi-currency support. Its high customer support rating (4.96/5) and ease of use (4.6/5) make onboarding smoother for staff.
GoldenUp is best for property owners and managers seeking AI-driven revenue insights to maximize profitability. It’s ideal if your team wants to complement existing management tools with data analytics and strategic recommendations. However, it’s not recommended if you require a full PMS or operational features for daily management.
Edge: Counter for operational hotels; GoldenUp for revenue strategists.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive, straightforward interface and quick staff onboarding. Users report that the platform loads seamlessly on both desktop and mobile browsers, allowing management from anywhere. Customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising responsiveness and technical assistance.
GoldenUp offers no UI ratings or onboarding data, making it impossible to compare ease of use directly. Its focus on AI analytics suggests a more specialized interface that may require familiarity with data tools. Given Counter’s recent reviews and high usability scores, it clearly provides a smoother experience for your team.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features including channel management, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-lingual support—features that directly impact daily operations. GoldenUp offers no standalone operational features, concentrating solely on revenue analysis and AI recommendations.
Counter’s broad feature set supports everything from reservations to housekeeping, offering a true all-in-one platform. GoldenUp’s value is limited to its AI insights, which complement but do not replace traditional PMS functions. For a hotel needing operational tools, Counter’s feature count makes it the clear choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores 4.96/5, with specific praise for quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the ongoing responsiveness, even amid system bugs impacting operations, and the support team’s willingness to implement improvements.
GoldenUp’s support quality and customer ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to compare directly. Given that Counter’s recent reviews reflect a highly engaged support team, it offers a more reliable experience for your team’s needs.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, and WuBook. These integrations facilitate online bookings, payments, and access management, helping to centralize your operations.
GoldenUp has no listed integrations, limiting its utility as an operational platform. Counter’s broader ecosystem ensures your property can connect with multiple distribution channels and financial tools. If integrations are crucial, Counter is clearly superior.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s current review score is 4.73/5 based on 54 reviews, all recent, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers in hostels, boutique hotels, and city-center properties rate it highly, especially praising its ease of use and support. Recent reviews highlight its role in simplifying complex operations and reducing manual effort.
GoldenUp has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hoteliers’ satisfaction. Based on the available data, Counter’s higher and more recent ratings indicate superior user satisfaction.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list prices but offers a free, no-implementation-fee model, suggesting affordability and flexibility for small hotels and hostels. GoldenUp’s pricing details are also unavailable, but with no mention of a free tier or trial, it likely operates on an enterprise or subscription model.
Given that Counter’s cost structure is transparent, and it’s designed for small-scale operations, it’s likely more accessible for your hotel. GoldenUp’s lack of published pricing makes it difficult to compare, but its focus on analytics suggests a potentially higher price point.
Edge: Counter.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management or complex group booking features.
Not ideal if operational management, guest service, or booking functions are your primary needs.
Counter by Counter is a full-featured PMS with a proven track record, especially for hostels and small hotels, thanks to its ease of use, extensive features, and strong support. It simplifies daily operations while providing integrations to streamline your workflow. If operational efficiency is your main goal, Counter clearly stands out.
GoldenUp by GoldenUp offers valuable AI-driven revenue insights but lacks a dedicated PMS or operational features. It’s better suited for properties that already have management tools and want to optimize profitability through data analytics. Its limited real-world reviews and absence of integrations make it less ideal for day-to-day management.
In conclusion, if your hotel needs a reliable, all-in-one platform that covers daily management and guest experiences, Counter is the better choice. For revenue strategists aiming for profit maximization through sophisticated analytics, GoldenUp may complement existing systems but isn’t a standalone solution. Select the product that aligns with your operational priorities and growth goals.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 GoldenUp 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GoldenUp 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。GoldenUp:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,GoldenUp 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问