The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Hogatex |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hogatex PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, size, and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its more extensive feature set make it the more complete solution. Hogatex, with no current reviews or ratings, offers a broader but less proven platform. Which system will truly elevate your hotel’s operations?
Counter’s comprehensive, user-rated platform offers a proven track record, whereas Hogatex remains untested in recent deployments. Are you prioritizing reliability and community feedback or exploring new options?
Counter excels in supporting hostel operations with an intuitive interface, automation features, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for budget accommodations and hostels. Hogatex claims to be a full-scale PMS but has no recent reviews or user feedback to verify its effectiveness.
Counter’s 54 reviews over the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect strong user confidence, especially in ease of use and support. Hogatex’s absence of recent reviews suggests it’s either less adopted or less active in customer engagement, raising questions about ongoing support and reliability.
Counter’s interface is rated 4.6/5 and customer support 4.96/5, praised for responsiveness and helpfulness. Hogatex’s lack of publicly available ratings means you have no recent data on user satisfaction, support quality, or ease of onboarding.
Counter features 19 distinct functionalities, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and automated night audits. Hogatex’s feature set remains undefined, with no publicly listed capabilities, making Counter’s offering the more transparent and proven choice.
Support-wise, Counter’s support team is highly rated, with users highlighting quick, helpful assistance from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hogatex’s support details and customer feedback are unavailable, indicating uncertainty in service quality.
Counter’s integrations include seven verified partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds—covering key channels and payment solutions. Hogatex has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options for now.
Hoteliers rate Counter highly across segments, especially in hostels, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hogatex’s lack of reviews prevents any assessment of user satisfaction, making Counter the safer bet for assured positive feedback.
Pricing details for Counter are unavailable, but its no-cost model for core features, plus optional paid integrations, suggests flexibility. Hogatex’s pricing remains undisclosed, which complicates direct cost comparisons.
Counter is ideal for hostels, boutique hotels, city-center properties, and independent inns—particularly those needing a straightforward, feature-rich system that supports mobile management. Not recommended if your property requires extensive automation or a broader property type beyond hostels.
Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger or needs a full PMS, but the absence of reviews makes this uncertain. It’s not ideal if you prioritize proven customer support, recent user feedback, or robust integrations.
Counter vs Hogatex: The Bottom Line for Hotels
Counter’s large, recent review base and high ratings confirm its reliability and effectiveness in hostel management and small hotel operations. Hogatex, with no recent reviews or community feedback, remains an untested option in today’s market.
If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-use PMS with built-in automation, integrations, and strong support, go with Counter. Its extensive features and positive user feedback make it a dependable choice for properties seeking operational efficiency.
Choose Hogatex if you are exploring new vendors and are willing to accept the risk of limited real-world validation. Its lack of recent reviews and unknown support quality make it a less certain investment.
In conclusion, Counter clearly stands out as the more dependable, reviewed, and feature-rich choice, especially for hostels and small hotels. Hogatex’s potential is unverified, and without recent customer insights, it’s harder to recommend confidently.
Counter by Counter offers a feature-rich, user-rated platform with recent positive reviews, making it ideal for hostels and small hotels looking for proven operational tools. Hogatex PMS, with no recent feedback or ratings, remains an untested option that lacks demonstrated support and integrations.
Counter’s strong community feedback, multiple integrations, and ease of use make it the top choice. Hogatex’s lack of recent customer reviews and unknown capabilities place it at a disadvantage for hoteliers seeking reliable, current solutions.
Counter’s intuitive interface simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, reservations, and reporting, helping your team manage operations efficiently with minimal training. Its automation features—like automatic night audits and integrated POS—reduce manual work, freeing staff to focus on guest interactions.
Hogatex claims to streamline reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing but provides no recent user feedback to confirm these efficiencies. Without current reviews, it’s unclear if Hogatex reduces workload or improves guest satisfaction like Counter does.
Counter’s mobile-friendly design ensures your team can manage the property from anywhere, offering flexibility that’s especially valuable for small or busy hotels. Hogatex’s platform lacks publicly available usability data, making it uncertain whether it can deliver similar operational gains.
Support at Counter is highly rated, with quick responses and proactive problem-solving. Hogatex provides no recent support reviews, so your team might face challenges in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Counter’s integrations with key partners like SiteMinder and Stripe facilitate daily operations by consolidating bookings and payments. Hogatex’s integrations are nonexistent in available data, limiting its immediate usefulness for integrated workflows.
Overall, if your staff values ease of use, automation, and reliable support, Counter will likely improve your daily operations. Hogatex’s untested platform leaves its impact on daily management uncertain.
Counter’s support team scores 4.96/5, with reviewers praising their quick, friendly assistance. Testimonials highlight staff like Evelyn and Max as go-to contacts who resolve issues promptly, boosting team confidence.
Hogatex offers no recent review data on support quality. Without current feedback, it’s difficult to gauge whether their support team is responsive or provides effective onboarding, making Counter the more dependable choice.
Counter’s onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, and its user interface is praised for being clean and intuitive. Hogatex’s onboarding process and usability remain unverified due to lack of recent reviews.
Support features like 24/7 online assistance and dedicated account help set Counter apart. Without recent Hogatex customer feedback, its support quality remains unknown, posing a potential risk for new users.
In terms of staff adoption, Counter’s straightforward interface and positive onboarding ratings lead to faster staff training and higher user satisfaction. Hogatex’s unreviewed support and usability leave its ease of adoption in question.
Edge: Counter
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a built-in channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features are well-documented, with many praised for their practicality and ease of use.
Hogatex’s feature set remains undisclosed, and no recent reviews or detailed descriptions are available. Without verified features, it’s impossible to compare comprehensively, but Counter’s transparent feature list makes it a safer, more predictable choice.
Counter’s integrated POS and revenue tracking modules support a broader range of operational needs. Hogatex, lacking public feature details, does not currently demonstrate the same level of functional depth.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s customer support is rated 4.96/5, with users consistently praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Positive reviews cite quick solutions to issues and proactive communication, especially during onboarding.
Hogatex offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality and responsiveness unverified. Without community feedback, your hotel risks uncertain assistance, which can be critical during system issues or training.
Counter’s support team is known for addressing bugs swiftly and providing ongoing assistance, which contributes to high user satisfaction. Hogatex’s lack of recent support reviews and data makes it impossible to assess whether it can meet your hotel’s service needs.
Support quality is crucial for smooth daily operations; with Counter’s proven record, your team will likely experience fewer disruptions. Hogatex’s support remains an unknown factor, making it a less reliable choice.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations allow for streamlined bookings, payments, and access control, making daily operations smoother.
Hogatex currently has no verified integrations publicly listed. This limits its connectivity to essential third-party tools, potentially requiring manual processes that counteract efficiency.
Counter’s open partner ecosystem helps expand your hotel’s market reach and operational flexibility. Hogatex’s limited connectivity reduces its appeal for properties relying on multiple channels or payment providers.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s user base, primarily hostels and small hotels, rates it at 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels praise its ease of use, support, and automation features.
Hogatex lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Its absence from community feedback implies it’s less proven or less adopted in today’s hotel market.
Counter’s recent feedback confirms its strengths in usability, support, and feature set, especially for budget and hostel accommodations. Hogatex’s unverified reputation means it cannot be confidently recommended based on current user experiences.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but its free core features and optional paid services suggest a flexible, scalable approach for small to medium-sized properties.
Hogatex does not list any pricing information, leaving hoteliers to guess about costs or negotiate directly. The absence of transparent pricing may complicate budgeting decisions.
Counter’s lack of upfront costs and modular pricing make it suitable for properties seeking predictable investments. Hogatex’s undisclosed fees mean you should be cautious about potential hidden costs or lack of affordability.
Counter is best for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation without complex customization needs. It’s not suited for larger, enterprise-level hotels seeking highly tailored systems.
Hogatex might fit larger-scale operations, but the current lack of community feedback makes it a risky choice for hoteliers requiring proven support and functionality.
Counter’s extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven track record make it the more reliable choice for small hotels and hostels. Its broad feature set, integrations, and support infrastructure directly address the needs of properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Hogatex, without recent reviews or community feedback, remains an unverified contender. Its unknown support quality and features make it a risky option, especially when reliable service and proven results are critical.
If you need a trustworthy, well-supported platform with proven results, Counter is the clear winner. Hogatex might appeal if your hotel is larger, but it’s advisable to wait for more validation before choosing it.
Counter’s community-backed success and recent positive reviews give you confidence that it will meet your property’s operational needs. Its strong ecosystem of integrations and support makes it the safer, more strategic investment for your team.
Hogatex remains an unconfirmed candidate, with no recent user feedback to validate its claims. For now, Counter’s proven track record and high satisfaction scores make it the preferred option for hoteliers looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest experiences.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision toward a system that’s not only feature-rich but also trusted by your peers. Prioritize proven support, community reviews, and real-world functionality — Counter currently leads in all these areas.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Hogatex PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hogatex PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Hogatex PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Hogatex 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问