The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Host PMS |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Host PMS |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Host PMS |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Counter by Counter and Host PMS by Host PMS serve the same core purpose: streamlining property management tasks for hotels and short-term rentals. Counter is tailored specifically for hostels, offering an all-in-one platform designed to simplify daily operations, while Host PMS claims to serve a broader property management audience with extensive automation tools. Given the current market data, which one should you trust to support your property’s growth?
Counter’s focus on hostels and its recent, robust review count give it a clear edge over Host PMS’s zero reviews and limited market presence. But is that enough to make your decision? Let’s explore how these two systems compare across key categories.
Counter is a cloud-based PMS built explicitly for hostels, boasting a simple, mobile-friendly interface with a 4.73-star rating based on 54 recent reviews. It offers an integrated channel manager, payment processing, and a booking engine, all designed to reduce manual tasks and improve operational efficiency. Meanwhile, Host PMS is described as a comprehensive system for managing short-term rentals but lacks any verified reviews or recent user feedback, making it hard to gauge real-world performance.
Counter’s reviews highlight its ease of use, fast customer support, and a broad feature set that includes house-keeping modules, guest CRM, and multi-lingual support. Host PMS, on the other hand, does not have detailed reviews or ratings available, which raises questions about its effectiveness and user satisfaction. Does your property need proven features and a strong support network?
If your hotel is a hostel or a small property focused on streamlined operations, Counter is the clear choice. Its 54 recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings demonstrate a solid track record of ease, support, and value. For properties seeking a flexible, mobile-friendly PMS with integrated booking, payments, and channel management, Counter’s platform is well-suited.
Host PMS might appeal if your property requires complex automation or targets a broader range of rental types, but with no recent reviews or verified user feedback, its reliability is uncertain. If you prioritize proven performance and customer support, Counter is the safer option.
Counter’s user interface scores 4.6 out of 5, with reviews praising its simplicity, ease of onboarding, and mobile access. Users mention that staff can learn the system quickly, and the onboarding process is rated 4.7 out of 5, highlighting its user-friendly design. Support is highly rated at 4.96, with reviewers noting fast, helpful responses from Evelyn and Max.
In contrast, Host PMS has no available ratings or recent reviews that detail usability or onboarding. Without tangible feedback, it’s impossible to assess how easy it is to implement or adopt. Given Counter’s strong, recent positive reviews, it clearly has the advantage here.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, group booking, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are tailored to streamline hostel operations and improve guest management.
Host PMS offers no publicly detailed features or unique functionalities, making it impossible to compare directly. Based on available data, Counter’s comprehensive feature set and dedicated modules give it a significant edge over Host PMS.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores 4.96 out of 5, with users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of its team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Recent reviews cite fast response times and professional support staff, reinforcing confidence in their service.
Host PMS has no available reviews or ratings concerning support, leaving their responsiveness and quality unverified. For ongoing, reliable support, Counter is clearly the better choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations enhance operational flexibility, allowing smooth management of payments, channel distribution, and access control.
Host PMS has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with external platforms. For a property that relies on seamless integration, Counter’s established partnerships are a major advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 recent reviews underscores high customer satisfaction, especially among hostel operators. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, with many citing increased efficiency as a direct benefit.
With no reviews or ratings available for Host PMS, there's no data to suggest it meets or exceeds user expectations. Based on current feedback, Counter is the superior-rated product.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not specify pricing details publicly, but users report it as offering significant ROI, with high satisfaction levels across multiple features. Host PMS also lacks transparent pricing information, complicating direct comparison.
Given Counter’s positive reviews about value and the absence of cost concerns, it likely offers a competitive, scalable pricing model suitable for small to mid-sized properties. Host PMS’s pricing remains unknown, making it difficult to evaluate its affordability.
Counter is a proven, highly-rated PMS designed for hostels and small hotels, with a recent, extensive review base—making it the clear winner for most hoteliers. Its comprehensive feature set, strong support, and broad integrations create a compelling package tailored for your operational needs.
Host PMS, while promising, lacks recent user feedback and verified reviews, making its reliability and feature set uncertain. If your goal is a tested, well-supported system with proven performance, Counter is the best choice for your hotel.
If your property requires extensive automation and a broad property type focus, and you’re comfortable with less verified user data, Host PMS might be worth exploring further. However, for immediate confidence and proven results, Counter remains the better, more dependable option.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Host PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Host PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Host PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Host PMS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问