The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | #68 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hostify by Hostify hinges on your property's specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter is tailored for hostels, especially those in Europe and North America, while Hostify targets vacation rentals and Airbnb-focused businesses worldwide. Your decision should be based on whether you prioritize ease of use, recent reviews, or feature depth.
Counter boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, indicating a more established and trusted presence. Hostify, however, offers a broader feature set, especially for vacation rental management, despite its limited review data. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s size and operational model?
Counter is designed specifically for hostels and smaller accommodation providers, emphasizing simplicity, ease of use, and quick onboarding. Its intuitive interface scores 4.6/5 for ease of use, praised for its straightforward workflow and mobile accessibility.
Hostify, in contrast, caters more toward property managers handling hundreds of listings, with a focus on automation and multi-channel integration. Its support for large-scale vacation rentals and Airbnb management makes it a compelling choice if you operate multiple properties across platforms.
Both platforms lack extensive recent reviews; however, Counter has accumulated 54 reviews with recent feedback, making it the more reliable source of current customer sentiment. Hostify’s single review from the last six months offers limited insight but highlights its user-friendly approach.
Edge: Counter. Its extensive reviews, high ratings, and focus on hostels make it the more trusted choice for small to mid-sized properties.
If your hotel is a hostel, boutique inn, or a small independent property seeking a simple, cost-effective PMS, Counter is ideal. Its core features—booking management, channel integration, and POS—are sufficient for streamlined operations and are backed by a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 reviews, including many recent positive comments.
Conversely, if your hotel manages a large portfolio of vacation rentals, or you need extensive automation, multi-channel management, and guest communication tools, Hostify is better suited. Despite limited reviews, its feature set supports managing hundreds of listings with tools like guest messaging, online check-in, and automated reminders.
For hotels looking for a free, easy-to-use solution with active support, Counter is the stronger pick. If automation and managing multiple Airbnb accounts are your top priorities, Hostify’s broader features make it worth considering.
Edge: Counter for small-scale, hostelry-focused operations; Hostify for large-scale vacation rental management.
Counter’s user interface scores 4.6/5, and users praise its intuitive design, especially for staff training and remote management. Support ratings are high at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max.
Hostify’s UI boasts a perfect 5/5 rating, emphasizing its user-friendliness and continuous improvements. However, with only one recent review, feedback on support and ease of use remains limited.
Given the volume of reviews and ratings, Counter’s proven track record of onboarding and support makes it the more dependable choice for hotels prioritizing simplicity.
Edge: Counter. Its proven ease of use and responsive support give it the edge.
Counter offers 16 shared features plus 3 exclusive ones: group functionality, automated night audit, and cloud-based access. Its standout features include POS integration and automation for payments, streamlining daily operations.
Hostify provides 28 unique features, including guest communication via SMS, transactional emails, real-time status updates, online check-in/out, and a housekeeper mobile app. Its comprehensive automation suite supports scaling and managing large property portfolios.
While Hostify’s extensive feature set is impressive, Counter’s focus on essential hostel management features, especially POS and automation, makes it more targeted. The decision depends on whether you need a straightforward PMS or a feature-rich platform for larger operations.
Edge: Hostify, if extensive automation and guest communication are priorities; Counter if simplified hostel-specific features suffice.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising the quick, professional assistance from team members like Evelyn and Max. Many mention their responsiveness during onboarding and troubleshooting, although some note support can be slower outside peak hours.
Hostify’s customer support also receives a perfect 5/5 rating, with reviewers emphasizing ongoing improvements and responsiveness. However, with only one recent review, the robustness of support in practice remains less certain.
Overall, Counter’s extensive review base and high satisfaction scores suggest a more dependable support experience.
Edge: Counter. Its proven responsiveness and support quality make it the better choice.
Counter’s 54 reviews, with a 4.73/5 overall rating, show strong satisfaction across small hotels, hostels, and independent properties. Hoteliers especially appreciate its ease of use, automation, and support, with recent reviews confirming continued positive experiences.
Hostify’s single recent review from a vacation rental operator rates it highly, but lacks the volume and diversity of feedback to establish clear superiority. Its features are valued, but overall satisfaction data is limited.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Counter maintains a clear edge in customer ratings.
Edge: Counter. Its higher review count and ratings make it the more trusted choice.
Counter does not list a price or trial information publicly, suggesting a flexible or customized pricing model. It appears to be a free solution focused on hostel management, possibly with paid add-ons.
Hostify charges $800/month for its platform, with no mention of discounts or tiers. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-level automation and multi-channel features, suitable for larger property portfolios.
If affordability and simplicity are your priorities, Counter’s free model is appealing. For more extensive automation and scalability, Hostify’s price may be justified.
Edge: Counter, if budget is a concern; Hostify if you need a more comprehensive, paid solution.
Hotels that should consider Counter include:
Not ideal if:
Counter’s focus on hostels and small properties makes it perfect for teams seeking straightforward, efficient management.
Edge: Counter. Its simplicity and targeted features suit small-scale, hostel operators.
Hotels that should consider Hostify include:
Not ideal if:
Hostify fits best with property managers or rental owners scaling their operations with automation tools.
Edge: Hostify. Its automation and multi-channel features are tailored for large-scale rental management.
Counter is a straightforward, hostel-centric PMS praised for its ease of use, excellent support, and recent positive reviews. Its core automation features and channel integrations make it ideal for small to mid-sized properties, especially hostels and boutique hotels.
Hostify offers an expansive feature set designed for vacation rentals and large property portfolios, emphasizing automation, guest communication, and multi-channel management. Despite limited recent reviews, its capabilities suit property managers needing to scale operations efficiently.
For small, hostelry-focused businesses seeking reliability, Counter is the safer, more proven choice. Larger, multi-property managers prioritizing automation and integration should lean toward Hostify.
Counter’s high review count and recent feedback give it a definitive edge, confirming its status as the more trusted PMS for small-scale hotels and hostels.
Final Recommendation: If your hotel is a hostel or small boutique, go with Counter. If managing hundreds of vacation rentals or multiple Airbnb accounts, Hostify’s features justify its higher price.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Hostify 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hostify 提供 13 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hostify 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Hostify:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Hostify 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问