The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
You're evaluating two property management systems: Counter by Counter and Hotel Software by Acigrup. Both aim to streamline operations, but Counter is the clear leader given its robust feature set, recent reviews, and higher user confidence. Counter's focus on hostels and smaller properties makes it an attractive, cost-effective choice for certain segments, while Acigrup's minimal online presence and lack of recent feedback weaken its position.
Which system truly fits your hotel's specific needs? Let's compare them directly.
Counter and Acigrup both claim to simplify hotel management, but Counter’s more recent reviews and higher ratings show it has gained significant user confidence. Counter’s 54 reviews in the last six months with a 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction; Acigrup, with no recent reviews or verified feedback, offers no such validation.
Counter's ease of use (4.6/5) and customer support (4.96/5) are consistently praised, unlike Acigrup, which lacks recent user feedback. Counter’s extensive feature set, including channel management, payment processing, and automated night audits, outpaces Acigrup’s limited online footprint, making Counter the more reliable choice today.
Are you willing to choose a system with no recent user validation? If not, Counter is the safer bet.
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel, boutique, or city-center property, Counter’s dedicated features and user base make it the logical choice. Its focus on hostels, with 83% of its users in this segment, means it’s optimized for their specific workflows, especially for small to medium-sized properties looking for an affordable, easy-to-use PMS.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable PMS with extensive integrations, Counter’s verified partnerships with platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds make it the better choice. Acigrup, on the other hand, offers no recent reviews or verified integrations, so its suitability remains untested.
For hotels seeking a trusted, well-supported platform with a strong reputation, Counter stands out.
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5, with many reviews highlighting its simple, intuitive interface that staff can learn quickly. Customers praise its mobile-friendly design, which allows management on the go, along with onboarding ratings of 4.7/5. Support staff like Evelyn and Max are often commended for their responsiveness.
In contrast, Acigrup provides no recent reviews or user ratings, leaving its ease of use unverified. Its lack of documented user experience makes Counter the clear winner for hotels prioritizing straightforward, quick adoption.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a channel manager, integrated payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, and guest CRM—features absent from Acigrup. Its housekeeper module, automated night audit, multi-lingual, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking are tailored for small to midsize properties seeking comprehensive operational control.
Acigrup’s feature set remains undocumented, with no verified features or integrations available publicly. Given Counter’s extensive feature count and proven capabilities, it offers a distinctly richer toolset.
Edge: Counter.
Customer support at Counter is rated 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and dedicated support staff. Hoteliers note that Evelyn and Max are “super responsive,” and the support team often resolves issues promptly, contributing to high user satisfaction.
Acigrup offers no recent customer support ratings or reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Without recent feedback, Counter’s support reputation clearly favors it as the more dependable option.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki, offering broad connectivity for distribution, payments, and access control. Its integrations streamline operations and expand market reach.
Acigrup has no verified partnerships or integrations documented publicly, raising questions about its connectivity and operational flexibility. For a hotel seeking seamless platform integration, Counter’s open ecosystem makes it the better choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 and NPS score of 9.02/10 reflect high customer satisfaction. Its reviews are mostly recent, with users highlighting ease of use, support, and automation, especially among hostels and small hotels.
Acigrup lacks recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Given Counter’s solid recent feedback, it’s the clear favorite among hoteliers.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publish explicit pricing but offers no-trial, no-implementation fees, and a flat monthly rate. Its value-for-money rating of 4.8/5 suggests competitive pricing, especially for small properties.
Acigrup's pricing remains undisclosed, with no trial options or transparent fee structure available. The lack of pricing transparency combined with no recent reviews diminishes confidence in Acigrup’s value proposition.
Not ideal if: You operate at a large chain level needing extensive corporate reporting, or if you require a PMS with a well-documented support network outside of Europe and North America.
Not ideal if: Your hotel needs proven reliability, recent user feedback, or a comprehensive feature set.
Counter, with its 54 recent reviews and high ratings, is a proven, well-regarded system. Its extensive features, proven integrations, and responsive support make it suitable for small to midsize properties, especially hostels, seeking automation and operational simplicity.
Acigrup, with no recent feedback or verified features, offers no clear advantages. Its unverified status and lack of online presence make it an unreliable choice for hotels that value transparency, proven performance, and ongoing support.
If your goal is a reliable, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews, Counter is the clear choice. Acigrup may remain a placeholder without current validation, making it a risky option for your hotel’s management needs.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Hotel Software 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotel Software 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Hotel Software:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Acigrup 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问