The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module.
Hotel.care 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Hotel.care 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #75 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #55 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hotel.care by Hotel.care hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational style. Counter’s established presence, extensive reviews, and high ratings make it a trusted choice for small to mid-sized hostels, while Hotel.care’s innovative, API-rich approach caters to properties seeking maximum flexibility and integration. Both aim to streamline bookings and operations, but their core strengths differ. So, which platform will truly elevate your hotel's management?
Counter has built a reputation as a straightforward, user-friendly PMS for hostels, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, backed by 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating. Its ease of onboarding (4.7/5) and customer support (4.96/5) are highly praised, especially for small teams managing multiple booking channels. Hotel.care, however, currently has no reviews or ratings, making its suitability and user satisfaction less clear.
Counter’s median review highlights its clean, intuitive interface, fast support, and automation features like POS integration, yet persistent bugs—particularly with overbooking and bed display—are noted issues. Conversely, Hotel.care emphasizes flexibility, API integrations, and a modern, headless architecture, but without user feedback, its user-friendliness or reliability remains untested. Are you willing to adopt a proven, reviewed system or explore a new, flexible platform?
If your hotel needs a dependable, well-rated PMS primarily for hostel or small hotel operations, Counter is the clear choice, with its extensive review base and proven track record. Its strengths include a straightforward interface, rapid onboarding, and high customer satisfaction, especially in support and automation.
If your property demands deep customization, multiple integrations, and a highly flexible, API-first architecture to connect with various third-party systems, Hotel.care’s headless design and 57 APIs make it attractive. However, without user reviews, its real-world performance and support quality are uncertain, so it’s better suited for tech-savvy teams willing to experiment.
In summary, for reliability and a proven track record, go with Counter. For maximum customization and future-proofing, consider Hotel.care—if you’re comfortable with less user feedback.
Counter’s UI scores 4.6/5, with many reviewers citing its intuitive, simple interface that’s easy to learn and operate. Onboarding is rated 4.7/5, and staff adoption appears smooth, supported by positive comments about staff training and minimal learning curve. Customer support is also a standout, with a 4.96/5 rating and praise for responsiveness, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max.
Hotel.care, however, has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making its ease of use hard to assess. Its API-driven, headless design suggests a more complex setup that may require technical expertise, potentially making staff adoption slower unless your team is highly familiar with APIs and system integrations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 17 shared features and two exclusive ones: a housekeeping module and cloud-based operation. Its automation includes POS, online check-in/out, and automatic payments, which are especially beneficial for hostels and small hotels. Its channel manager supports multiple platforms, with integrations like Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds.
Hotel.care boasts 27 unique features, including transactional emails, guest messaging (SMS), gift vouchers, task management, digital registration, and revenue management modules. Its API-rich environment allows for extensive customization, integration, and advanced digital features, but the absence of user reviews limits insights into actual deployment.
Edge: Hotel.care, for feature breadth and API flexibility, assuming you require deep customization.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance from team members like Evelyn and Max. Multiple users appreciate their support team’s professionalism, though some note slower responses during off-hours.
Hotel.care lacks any publicly available customer support ratings or reviews, making it difficult to evaluate. Its recent launch and small team (five employees) suggest support might be limited or less proven, especially without customer feedback.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including Stripe, WuBook, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds, providing robust connectivity with booking channels and payment providers. Its integration with industry-standard platforms facilitates streamlined operations and consolidated income management.
Hotel.care, with only three verified integrations (including Stripe and Pitchup.com), offers a narrower ecosystem, but its API-first design allows for potential expansion. Its extensive API library (57 APIs) means that, with technical resources, your hotel could develop custom integrations, but out-of-the-box connectivity remains limited.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with 54 reviews in the last six months and a 4.73/5 overall rating. Hotels of various sizes, predominantly hostels (83%), praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Properties like hostels appreciate its clarity and simplicity, while some mention bugs affecting bookings.
Hotel.care has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or to understand how properties perceive its performance. Its recent launch and small user base mean it has yet to build a reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not list a pricing structure publicly, suggesting a custom quote based on property needs. It does not offer a freemium or trial version, which may be a consideration for smaller properties testing the system.
Hotel.care charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no free trial or freemium option. Its pricing reflects its advanced, API-heavy design, which could be cost-effective for larger, tech-savvy properties but might be steep for smaller operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter provides a tested, user-friendly PMS with strong ratings, especially suited for hostels and small hotels that prioritize ease of use, automation, and support. Its existing integrations, positive reviews, and operational simplicity make it a dependable choice for properties seeking immediate, reliable management.
Hotel.care offers an innovative, API-first platform designed for highly customizable operations. Its flexibility and extensive feature set appeal to tech-savvy properties with complex needs or those aiming for digital transformation, but the lack of user feedback introduces risk.
If your hotel values proven reliability, ease of use, and extensive support, Counter remains the stronger choice. If your team can handle a more technical setup and seeks advanced customization, Hotel.care could be worth exploring—if you’re prepared for less review-backed certainty.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Hotel.care 共享 17 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Hotel.care 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotel.care 提供 4 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Hotel.care:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Hotel.care 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问