The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Hotelgest |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Hotelgest |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Hotelgest |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operations and guest experience. Both Counter by Counter and Hotelgest by Hotelgest aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge sharply in market presence, review credibility, and feature depth. Counter, with its focus on hostels and a strong track record, offers a comprehensive suite backed by recent, detailed reviews. Hotelgest, meanwhile, has minimal recent feedback and less regional reach, making its suitability less clear. How do these differences impact your decision?
Counter has established itself as a leading PMS for hostels, boasting a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its strengths lie in ease of use, customer support, and high user satisfaction driven by features like channel management, payment processing, and automation. Conversely, Hotelgest's ratings are nonexistent or unverified, with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it difficult to gauge its real-world performance or suitability for your hotel.
Counter's user feedback emphasizes its intuitive interface, fast support, and reliable automation, making daily operations smoother. Hotelgest lacks recent reviews and detailed feedback, so its strengths, weaknesses, and user satisfaction remain uncertain. Does your hotel need a proven platform with solid reviews and active support? Or are you exploring less validated options?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or budget accommodation with a focus on automation, ease of management, and a proven track record, go with Counter. It’s the only platform with verified reviews, a high overall rating, and a broad feature set tailored for hostels, including channel management, booking engine, and integrated POS.
If your hotel is a traditional property seeking AI-driven insights or a less established PMS with undefined support and feature offerings, consider Hotelgest. However, given the lack of recent data and reviews, you risk choosing an untested solution that may not meet your operational needs. For clarity, Counter’s proven reputation makes it the safer choice.
Counter’s interface scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many users describing it as clean, simple, and quick to learn. Onboarding experiences are rated highly, and staff report that the platform is intuitive enough for rapid staff adoption. Conversely, Hotelgest lacks any recent reviews or user feedback, preventing a definitive comparison on usability. The absence of user data suggests it may not yet have widespread adoption or proven ease of use.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, centralized guest CRM, automated night audits, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are specifically built for hostels and small hotels, enabling comprehensive management from reservations to housekeeping.
Hotelgest provides AI-driven insights and automation tools, but with no detailed feature list or verified customer feedback, its capabilities remain unverified. It also has zero verified integrations, unlike Counter’s seven partners, including Stripe and SiteMinder. Counter’s extensive feature set clearly outmatches Hotelgest’s vague offerings.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with reviewers praising fast, helpful responses from dedicated support staff like Evelyn and Max. Recent reviews mention support responsiveness even during busy times, which enhances user confidence.
Hotelgest's support ratings are unavailable, and there are no recent reviews to determine responsiveness or quality. The lack of recent feedback puts its customer support into question, especially when critical issues arise. Given the importance of reliable support, Counter’s well-documented responsiveness is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major channel managers (SiteMinder, Goki), POS systems (Stripe), and revenue tools (Flyr). These integrations facilitate seamless operations across platforms and improve revenue management.
Hotelgest reports no verified integrations or partner connections. Without integrations, your hotel might face manual data entry and fragmented operations, limiting efficiency. Counter’s open integration ecosystem makes it more adaptable to your existing tech stack.
Edge: Counter.
Counter is rated 4.73/5 overall, with 54 recent reviews, predominantly from hostel operators and small hotels. Hoteliers highlight its user-friendliness, support, and automation as key benefits.
Hotelgest has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction or property-specific feedback. The recent review volume and high ratings for Counter make it the clearly preferred choice among hoteliers actively using PMS platforms today.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list pricing but is marketed as a free PMS tailored for hostels, with no implementation or monthly fees. Its business model appears to be based on optional paid add-ons or integrations.
Hotelgest's pricing details are unavailable, and no trial or demo information is provided. The lack of transparent pricing complicates direct comparison, but Counter’s free offering and clear value proposition favor its adoption for budget-conscious or small properties.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced AI insights, extensive customization, or enterprise-scale solutions.
Not ideal if you need proven support, extensive integrations, or a large user community.
Counter is the clear leader for your hotel if you want a well-supported, feature-rich PMS with proven success among hostels and small hotels. Its high ratings, recent reviews, and broad integration ecosystem attest to its reliability and operational value.
Hotelgest may appeal if you seek AI-driven features and are comfortable with unverified support and limited recent feedback. However, the absence of recent reviews and integrations makes it less trustworthy for active, revenue-generating properties.
Ultimately, if your goal is stability and proven performance, Counter is the safer, smarter choice. For innovative, experimental solutions, Hotelgest might be worth exploring, but with caution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Hotelgest 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotelgest 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Hotelgest:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Hotelgest 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问