Counter vs. Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews): 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 15, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

Hotello 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Hotello 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter Hotello Hotello
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 Hotello:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter Hotello Hotello
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter Hotello Hotello
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter Hotello Hotello
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hotello PMS hinges on your specific needs and the maturity of each product. Both aim to simplify hotel management but approach it differently; Counter is a dedicated, feature-rich, hostel-focused PMS, while Hotello offers a broader hotel industry platform with a strong emphasis on reliability and user experience. Their core differences are their target user base, feature depth, and support ecosystem.

Counter, with its 54 reviews and recent feedback, scores significantly higher across key metrics, making it a more proven choice for hostels and budget accommodations. Hotello, despite being a larger, established vendor, has no recent reviews or user feedback, raising questions about current performance and support. Is your hotel ready to prioritize a well-supported, actively reviewed product?

Quick Verdict: Counter vs Hotello PMS — Which Is the Clear Winner?

Counter stands out due to its high overall ratings, extensive feature set tailored for hostels, and active user reviews. Hotello’s lack of recent feedback and zero ratings make it difficult to evaluate its current capabilities or support quality. If your hostel or small property needs an intuitive, proven PMS with strong support, Counter is the obvious choice.

However, if your hotel requires a scalable, enterprise-grade PMS with a broader feature set and a focus on reliability, you may want to explore Hotello further once it garners more recent user feedback. For now, Counter’s active user base and recent reviews give it a clear edge.

Is Counter or Hotello Easier to Use?

Counter boasts a 4.6/5 ease of use rating from over 50 reviews, with users praising its intuitive, clean interface that simplifies staff training and daily management. Reviewers highlight its mobile-friendly design, allowing your team to manage operations remotely, which is especially useful for hostels on the go.

Conversely, Hotello has no recent user reviews or ratings to assess its ease of use, making it impossible to compare current usability. Given Counter's proven track record, edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Hotello?

Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking, all tailored for hostel operations. Hotello, with no feature count listed, appears to focus on core PMS functions but lacks explicit details about advanced or niche features.

Counter’s feature set is clearly designed for hostel-specific needs, giving it an advantage for small and mid-sized properties. Hotello’s broader hotel focus might provide more scalability, but without recent feature updates or reviews, Counter’s feature depth makes it the more actionable choice. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Hotello?

Counter scores an impressive 4.96/5 in customer support from 54 recent reviews, with users frequently praising quick, helpful responses and professional staff like Evelyn and Max. Many reviews mention how support addresses bugs and operational issues efficiently, though some note slower responses in certain time zones.

Hotello provides no recent support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to judge its responsiveness or quality. Given Counter’s recent, positive feedback, edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Hotello?

Counter has 7 verified integrations, including Stripe, Goki, and SiteMinder, focusing on payment processing and channel management for hostels. Hotello boasts 16 verified partners, including large names like Sage, STR, and TrustYou, suggesting a broader integration ecosystem.

However, the number alone isn’t decisive; quality and relevance matter. Counter’s integrations are well-suited for hostel environments, while Hotello’s wider network may appeal to larger or more complex hotel operations. Still, with recent reviews favoring Counter’s usability, edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Hotello?

Counter’s 54 recent reviews with a 4.73/5 rating reflect strong satisfaction, especially among hostel and small property segments. Reviewers appreciate its simplicity, automation, and excellent support, with a 91% likelihood to recommend.

Hotello, lacking recent reviews and ratings, offers no current data on user sentiment. The absence of recent feedback suggests less confidence in its current performance. Therefore, edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Hotello Cost?

Both products do not publicly list pricing, which is typical for enterprise or niche PMS providers. Counter offers a freemium model, but specific fees are undisclosed, while Hotello’s pricing details are also unavailable. You'll need to contact vendors directly for quotes.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate hostels, backpacker lodges, or budget accommodations, especially those focusing on simplicity and automation.
  • Teams prioritizing ease of use, rapid onboarding, and responsive support.
  • Properties needing integrated payment processing and channel management.
  • Small to mid-sized properties with limited IT resources.
  • Hotels seeking mobile management capabilities.

Not ideal if your hotel requires complex revenue management systems, extensive customization, or large-scale enterprise features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Hotello?

  • Larger hotels or hotel groups looking for a reliable, scalable PMS capable of managing multiple properties.
  • Hotels that prioritize system stability and a robust, industry-grade platform.
  • Properties interested in extensive third-party integrations and automation.
  • Hotels seeking a modern, cloud-based system with a focus on guest experience.
  • Hotels with a dedicated IT or management team capable of onboarding and maintaining a more sophisticated system.

Not ideal if your property is small, or if you need a system with current, user-reviewed support and features.

The Bottom Line for Hotels: Counter vs Hotello PMS

Counter’s core advantage lies in its proven performance, active user reviews, and tailored features for hostels. Its intuitive design and high support ratings make it the safer choice for small and mid-sized properties aiming for operational simplicity.

Hotello, while promising in design and scalability, currently lacks recent feedback, making it a less certain pick. If your hotel values stability, active support, and a feature-rich environment for small to medium properties, Counter is the clear winner.

For properties like hostels or small inns that want an easy-to-use, well-supported management system, Counter’s recent reviews and extensive feature set make it the ideal choice. Larger hotels or groups seeking a broader platform might need to wait for more recent validation from Hotello.

Counter 和 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter Hotello Hotello

Counter 有哪些 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter Hotello Hotello
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 Hotello:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
Hotello
Hotello
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 16 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews)?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews)?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Hotello 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息