The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
HotelXP |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
HotelXP |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
HotelXP |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and HotelXP by HotelXP hinges on your hotel's operational needs and growth plans. Counter, with its established track record and robust review base, is a PMS tailored explicitly for hostels and small accommodations, offering core features like channel management, booking engine, and automated night audits. HotelXP, however, lacks review data and market presence, making it difficult to judge its suitability for your property—yet, it promises a broader scope of functions for larger or more complex hotels.
Counter stands out as the more proven option, especially for hostels and small hotels seeking a straightforward, reliable PMS. Conversely, without recent reviews or a clear feature set, HotelXP remains untested in the market, making it a riskier choice for your team. Now, the key question is: which platform aligns better with your hotel's size and operational complexity?
Counter has amassed a significant number of reviews—54 in total, with recent feedback—making it the more trustworthy option. It boasts a high overall score of 4.73/5, with customer support rated nearly perfect at 4.96/5, and ease of use at 4.6/5. Users praise Counter’s intuitive interface, rapid support, and feature set tailored to hostel management, including channel management, booking engine, and automated night audits.
HotelXP, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings available, which signals it’s either new or not yet adopted widely. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess its performance, support, or usability. The lack of recent reviews for HotelXP makes Counter the safer, more data-backed choice. Are you comfortable risking unproven software for potential additional features?
If your hotel is a hostel, boutique inn, or small property needing a straightforward, tested PMS with strong customer support, go with Counter. Its existing hotelier community praises its ease of onboarding and operational features, making it ideal for busy staff.
If your hotel requires a more comprehensive system with advanced analytics or AI-driven insights—features not yet verified in HotelXP—Counter’s proven performance should guide your decision. HotelXP’s promise of unified reservation and guest management may appeal if you’re looking for a future-proof solution, but without reviews, it’s a gamble.
For now, Counter’s extensive feature set, regional presence, and positive reviews make it the clear choice for most small to mid-sized hotels looking for reliability. HotelXP might be worth considering only if you prioritize untested, future-facing technology and are willing to accept the risk of limited feedback.
Counter scores highly on usability, with a 4.6/5 rating for ease of use. Users describe its interface as clear, simple, and quick to learn, with many noting staff training is minimal. The onboarding process is rated 4.7/5, with hoteliers highlighting the intuitive design and mobile-friendly operation, enabling managers to handle tasks remotely.
HotelXP has no available user ratings or reviews, leaving its usability unverified. Without real user feedback, it’s impossible to assess how easily your team can adopt and operate the system. Given Counter’s established reputation for user-friendliness, it remains the more reliable choice for hotels prioritizing ease of staff onboarding.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, group booking management, multi-currency, and multi-lingual support. Its integration with platforms like Stripe, Goki, and SiteMinder enhances operational flexibility, especially for hostels and small hotels.
HotelXP’s feature set is not publicly detailed, and it has no verified integrations or unique features documented in the available data. This lack of transparency and user feedback sidelines HotelXP in competing for feature depth. For now, Counter’s comprehensive and proven feature set gives it a decisive edge.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team earns an impressive 4.96/5 rating, with hoteliers praising quick, helpful responses. Review quotes highlight staff like Evelyn and Max for their professionalism, though some note support can be slower outside certain time zones.
HotelXP’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, and there are no reviews to gauge user satisfaction. Without concrete feedback, it’s impossible to compare support quality, but Counter’s well-rated support team and detailed positive feedback tip the scale comfortably.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Goki, Cloudbeds, and FLYR Hospitality. These integrations support channel management, payments, and revenue management, making Counter adaptable to diverse operational needs.
HotelXP has no verified integrations documented, suggesting a limited or undeclared partner ecosystem. The lack of integrations reduces flexibility and hinders connectivity with existing systems. Therefore, Counter’s established network of integrations gives it a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews, with 54 recent entries, consistently rate the product at 4.73/5 overall. Hoteliers across different segments, especially hostels, appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature set, with a 91% likelihood to recommend.
HotelXP, lacking reviews, cannot be rated by users, leaving its reception unknown. Without recent feedback, Counter’s proven high ratings are the definitive choice for hoteliers seeking a trusted, well-rated PMS.
Edge: Counter.
Pricing details for Counter are not publicly available, and it operates on a custom model—common in SaaS for PMS systems. HotelXP also does not disclose pricing, making comparison impossible.
Given the lack of transparency, your best approach is to contact vendors directly for quotes. However, the proven market presence and user reviews for Counter suggest it offers competitive, scalable pricing suitable for small and medium hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter’s notable review count, high ratings, and proven feature set make it the safer, more established choice for small and mid-sized hotels, especially hostels. Its extensive integrations, responsive support, and regional presence reinforce its suitability for properties seeking reliability and ease of use.
HotelXP, while promising a broad feature scope and AI-driven insights, lacks actual user feedback and market presence, making it a riskier investment. It may appeal to larger, innovative hotels willing to experiment with untested systems but isn't recommended for hotels that value proven performance.
In conclusion, if your priority is stability, support, and proven features backed by recent reviews, Counter is the clear winner. Consider HotelXP only if you're prepared to accept the unknowns of a less-tested platform and see potential future benefits.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 HotelXP 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelXP 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。HotelXP:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,HotelXP 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问