The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Ancillary revenue tracking.
ibelsa GmbH 表现出色 在 ease of use and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated CRS and Digital Registration.
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 1 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 ibelsa GmbH 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #65 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #69 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #47 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and ibelsa.rooms by ibelsa GmbH hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they approach this from different angles: Counter is a lightweight, hostelry-focused solution, while ibelsa.rooms offers a more comprehensive, customizable platform suited for complex operations. Your decision should consider your hotel’s size, technical sophistication, and growth plans.
Counter simplifies your daily tasks with an easy-to-navigate interface and a strong focus on hostels and small hotels. ibelsa.rooms, on the other hand, provides a modular, scalable solution designed to handle the increasing complexity of hotel management. Are you seeking straightforward functionality or a platform that can grow with your property?
Counter is tailored to hostels and small properties, with a focus on ease of use, quick onboarding, and essential features that support daily operations without overwhelming your team. It has a high user satisfaction score, driven by its simple interface and responsive support, but its feature set is limited compared to ibelsa.rooms.
ibelsa.rooms caters to hotels facing more complex management challenges, offering extensive customization, automation, and integration options. It has a strong focus on automating processes and connecting with third-party systems, making it suitable for mid-sized hotels or properties planning future expansion. Which of these profiles aligns better with your current needs: simplicity or scalability?
Counter’s review count (54 reviews) and recent feedback give a clearer picture of its current performance, whereas ibelsa GmbH’s single recent review limits direct comparison. Counter’s reviews highlight user-friendly design and effective support, yet some bugs and reporting limitations persist. ibelsa.rooms, with a minimal recent review, emphasizes flexibility and continuous development, but lacks recent customer feedback to validate its current usability.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement PMS with quick onboarding and minimal training, go with Counter. Its clear interface and mobile friendliness make it ideal for hostels or small hotels with limited administrative staff.
If your property requires a highly customizable system capable of handling complex operations, multi-property management, or future growth, ibelsa.rooms is the better choice. Its modular structure and continuous updates are designed for hotels aiming for automation and extensive third-party integrations.
For owners of hostels, boutique hotels, or properties with limited technical resources, Counter’s simplicity and affordability are compelling. Conversely, if you operate a city center hotel or a property with diverse management needs, ibelsa.rooms offers the flexibility to adapt to your evolving requirements.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, straightforward navigation, and quick staff training. Onboarding is rated 4.7/5, and users often remark on how seamlessly the system loads on mobile browsers, aiding on-the-go management.
ibelsa.rooms boasts a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, supported by its modular design that allows users to tailor workflows and interfaces to their hotel’s unique needs. Its support and onboarding are also rated 5/5, with users praising its user-friendly setup and consistent updates.
Edge: ibelsa.rooms.
Counter offers 14 shared features, including essential PMS functions, but has five exclusive features such as payment processing, online 24/7 support, automated night audit, multi-currency management, and ancillary revenue tracking. These specialized features make it well-suited for hostels needing quick financial and operational automation.
ibelsa.rooms provides only two unique features—integrated CRS and digital registration—but includes a broad suite of modules allowing extensive customization. Its focus on automation and connection to third-party systems enhances operational efficiency, especially for hotels with complex management needs.
In terms of feature depth and customization, ibelsa.rooms offers more potential for tailored solutions, but Counter’s specific features are more directly targeted for hostel and small hotel operations.
Edge: ibelsa.rooms.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with multiple reviews praising its quick response and helpful staff, particularly mentioning team members like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the ongoing improvements and flexibility, though some report support delays in certain time zones.
ibelsa GmbH’s customer support is rated 5/5, with all reviews highlighting its availability via phone and helpfulness. Its dedicated support team is praised for prompt assistance, though the limited recent reviews make it harder to gauge current responsiveness.
Edge: ibelsa.rooms.
Counter has 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds, along with niche integrations like WuBook and Goki. Its integration scope covers essential payment, channel management, and revenue systems but remains limited compared to larger PMS providers.
ibelsa.rooms boasts 30 verified integrations, including notable partners like Profitroom, Customer Alliance, and Hotellistat. Its open API and flexible design facilitate extensive third-party connections, making it suitable for hotels requiring diverse system integrations.
Edge: ibelsa.rooms.
Counter’s overall rating is a strong 4.73/5 based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback indicating high satisfaction among hostels and small hotels. Reviewers highlight its simple interface, support responsiveness, and automation features, despite some bugs.
ibelsa GmbH’s single recent review scores a perfect 5/5, praising its flexibility and support. However, the lack of multiple reviews makes it difficult to gauge overall hotel sentiment, especially across different property types.
Given the more extensive review base and recent data, Counter is the clear leader in hoteliers’ ratings.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publish specific pricing, but it is described as free, making it attractive for budget-conscious hostels and small properties. Additional costs may apply for integrations or premium features.
ibelsa.rooms also does not publicly disclose pricing, but its emphasis on automation and customization suggests a tailored quote approach, likely reflecting property size and complexity. Both products lack free trials, so direct inquiry is necessary to determine exact costs.
Counter is a simple, effective PMS with a focus on hostels and small hotels, offering essential features and high user satisfaction. Its lightweight design and responsive support make it ideal for properties seeking quick setup and operational ease.
ibelsa.rooms provides a more flexible, customizable platform suited for hotels with complex management needs, especially those prioritizing automation and third-party integrations. Its modular structure and ongoing development make it a good fit for properties that anticipate growth or operational complexity.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing an intuitive, cost-effective solution, Counter is the clear choice. For larger, more complex hotels aiming for extensive automation and integration, ibelsa.rooms offers the scalability you need.
In summary, choose Counter if simplicity, speed, and support are your priorities. Opt for ibelsa.rooms if you need a customizable, future-proof platform that can evolve with your hotel’s needs.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 ibelsa.rooms 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 ibelsa.rooms 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ibelsa.rooms 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ibelsa.rooms 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。ibelsa.rooms:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,ibelsa GmbH 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问