The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Innfinity Software Systems 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Innfinity Software Systems 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Innfinity by Innfinity Software Systems depends on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and customer support expectations. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its more mature presence make it the more practical choice for most hoteliers. How do these differences align with your property’s specific requirements?
Counter has established itself as a user-friendly PMS with a proven track record, while Innfinity offers a broad, industry-spanning platform tailored for corporate and leisure properties alike. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize ease of use, recent reviews, and active support, or require a more extensive, multi-industry solution.
Both products aim to handle essential property management functions, but Counter is designed specifically for hostels, offering features like an integrated channel manager, booking engine, and POS tailored for hostel operations. Innfinity, by contrast, caters more broadly to leisure, workforce housing, and corporate travel sectors, with a focus on complex integrations like Air Canada AC2U and private jet booking.
Counter’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface, ease of onboarding, and strong customer support, with a 4.73/5 rating based on 54 reviews, including recent feedback. Innfinity, however, has no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its current performance or customer satisfaction. Given the more active review presence, Counter provides clearer insight into user experiences and ongoing improvements.
Edge: Counter
If your hotel is primarily a hostel or small property seeking a straightforward, easy-to-train system, Counter is the clear choice. Its features like channel management, automated night audits, and guest CRM are ideal for busy hostels handling high turnover and multiple online channels.
If you operate a leisure property, resort, or workforce accommodation needing extensive integrations and specialized travel booking tools—especially if your focus is North American markets—Innfinity could be more fitting. Its advanced corporate booking system and focus on connectivity make it better suited for large-scale or corporate-resort environments.
However, without recent reviews for Innfinity, Counter’s proven user satisfaction makes it the safer, more reliable option for most hotels.
Edge: Counter
Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating at 4.6/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with users praising its simple, intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and mobile functionality. Customers frequently mention how easily staff can be trained and how quickly they adapt to the system, with reviewers noting "no teaching necessary" and "very user-friendly" features.
Innfinity provides no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. Its target industries and complexity suggest it may have a steeper learning curve, especially for hotels unfamiliar with enterprise-level systems.
Edge: Counter
Counter offers 19 unique features including a channel manager, booking engine, automated night audit, POS system, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—features that are critical for hostel management and small hotels. Innfinity’s feature set is less transparent, with no detailed feature count available, but is known for its extensive corporate travel integrations and industry-specific solutions.
Counter’s comprehensive feature set, especially its automation and guest management tools, has been highly praised. Innfinity’s strengths lie in corporate and complex booking integrations, but its lack of recent reviews and detailed feature comparison puts Counter ahead for typical hotel needs.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s support ratings are outstanding—4.96/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with users describing the support team as "super responsive" and "helpful," especially highlighting staff like Evelyn and Max. Common praise includes quick responses and proactive assistance, although some mention slower support in different time zones.
Innfinity offers no recent support reviews, leaving its customer service reputation unverified. Given Counter’s high support ratings and recent customer feedback, it clearly provides a more dependable support experience.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular channel managers, payment processors, and revenue management systems like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds. Innfinity only lists one verified integration—Whistle—limiting its connectivity options.
Counter’s broader integration ecosystem allows for more flexible and scalable operations, ideal for hotels relying on multiple platforms. Innfinity’s limited integrations mean less flexibility for expanding connectivity.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s recent reviews, totaling 54, paint a picture of strong satisfaction, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and 91% likelihood to recommend. Reviewers from hostels and small properties highlight its ease of use, automation, and support.
Innfinity’s lack of recent reviews prevents meaningful comparison, but the absence suggests less active user engagement or recent performance issues. Based on existing data, Counter is clearly the higher-rated platform.
Edge: Counter
Counter does not publicly disclose specific pricing but is known not to charge implementation fees or offer a freemium model, indicating a straightforward pricing structure. Innfinity’s pricing details are also unavailable, with no trial or demo info provided.
Given the transparency and active market presence of Counter, you can anticipate a predictable cost structure aligned with its feature set, whereas Innfinity’s pricing remains unclear.
Not ideal if your property requires highly advanced revenue management tools or extensive corporate travel integrations.
Not ideal for small, independent hotels or properties seeking a highly reviewed, user-friendly PMS.
At its core, Counter is a simple, effective PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with a proven track record of customer satisfaction and active support. Innfinity offers a broader, more complex suite suited for large properties or corporations, but its lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence in current performance.
Choose Counter if you need a reliable, easy-to-use platform that’s well-supported and highly rated by actual users. Opt for Innfinity only if your operations demand extensive corporate integrations and industry-specific travel solutions, and you’re prepared to navigate less transparent support and features.
For most hotels, Counter provides a safer, more mature solution backed by recent, positive reviews, and a robust feature set suitable for day-to-day operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Innfinity 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Innfinity 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Innfinity 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Innfinity:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Innfinity Software Systems 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问