The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
InovGuest |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and InovGuest by InovGuest hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus is on ease of use for hostels, while InovGuest claims to offer broad operational automation. Given Counter’s strong recent reviews and extensive feature set, your decision should consider which product aligns best with your operational priorities.
Counter is a well-established PMS for hostels with a proven track record, boasting a high rating and large review base, making it a trusted choice. InovGuest, despite its promises, currently lacks recent reviews and user feedback, raising questions about its real-world effectiveness. So, which solution truly serves your property’s needs?
Counter’s key strength is its dedicated focus on hostels and small properties, offering a free, easy-to-use platform that simplifies daily operations. InovGuest claims to serve hotels broadly but has no recent reviews or measurable ratings, making it difficult to gauge its performance and user satisfaction. Counter’s 54 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.73/5 overall rating, reflect ongoing user satisfaction, while InovGuest remains an unreviewed entity.
Counter’s features include channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and housekeeping modules—many of which are absent or unconfirmed in InovGuest. Conversely, InovGuest’s lack of verified integrations and user feedback casts doubt on its current market presence. Which platform will reliably improve your hotel’s operational flow?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property seeking an intuitive, mobile-friendly PMS with strong onboarding and customer support, Counter is the clear choice. Its recent reviews underscore its simplicity, responsiveness, and extensive feature set, especially for hostels, with a 91% likelihood to recommend.
InovGuest might appeal if you’re a mid-sized or larger hotel looking for automation and integration, but the absence of recent reviews and verified integrations makes it a risky option right now. If you value proven support, detailed operational tools, and a product with a 4.73/5 rating from over 50 reviews, Counter is the safer, more reliable choice.
Counter’s interface is consistently praised for its clarity, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating and positive reviews highlighting its intuitive design. Users report that onboarding is smooth, staff adopt the system quickly, and remote management via mobile is seamless.
InovGuest, however, has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. With Counter’s proven track record and high user satisfaction, it clearly leads in ease of adoption. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—features that InovGuest does not currently list or verify. Its integrated modules support daily operations, revenue management, and guest communication in a comprehensive way.
InovGuest’s feature set remains unverified, with no listed functionalities or integrations. Given Counter’s detailed feature catalog and proven capabilities, it provides a more complete and reliable toolset for hotels. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive assistance. Reviewers frequently mention staff like Evelyn and Max, emphasizing their professionalism and quick resolution of issues.
InovGuest’s support ratings are unavailable, and without recent reviews, it’s impossible to assess support quality. Given Counter’s stellar reputation and recent review volume, it clearly stands out. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, providing a broad ecosystem of tools to extend functionality. InovGuest has no listed or verified integrations, limiting its immediate connectivity options.
With Counter’s established integrations, your hotel gains flexibility in managing online bookings, payments, and access control. The lack of verified partners for InovGuest suggests it is not yet ready for multi-platform environments. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews, with an overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect strong satisfaction across diverse hotel types, especially hostels. Reviewers highlight ease of use, customer support, and operational automation as key strengths.
InovGuest’s absence of recent reviews makes it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction. Until verified feedback emerges, Counter remains the preferred choice for hotelier-rated performance. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly listed, but no implementation fees or monthly charges are mentioned, suggesting potential flexibility or free access for certain features. InovGuest’s pricing is also unavailable, implying it might be a custom quote or still in development.
Without clear pricing data, your best bet is that Counter’s established presence and transparent feature offerings provide better value, especially considering its proven support and feature set. Edge: Counter.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter is a proven, highly-rated PMS with a broad feature set, dedicated focus on hostels, and a large review base demonstrating ongoing user satisfaction. InovGuest, despite its promising claims, currently lacks recent reviews, verified integrations, and measurable ratings, making it a less reliable option at this moment.
Choose Counter if you want a system that is easy to adopt, well-supported, and equipped with essential operational features. Its extensive integrations and positive recent reviews make it the safer, more effective choice for most hoteliers.
Opt for InovGuest only if your property can wait for further validation, and you’re interested in future automation and integration capabilities that are yet to be proven in the market. For now, Counter’s track record makes it the clear winner.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 InovGuest 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 InovGuest 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。InovGuest:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,InovGuest 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问