Counter vs. Isidoro: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

Isidoro 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 Isidoro 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 Isidoro 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Isidoro 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter Isidoro
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 Isidoro:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter Isidoro
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter Isidoro
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter Isidoro
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations and guest experience. Counter by Counter has established itself as a leading solution for hostels and small properties, boasting a high review count and recent positive feedback. Isidoro by Isidoro, on the other hand, has little to no recent reviews or notable market presence, making it difficult to evaluate its effectiveness. Given the data, Counter is the more proven and supported option for hoteliers.

Counter addresses key operational challenges like booking management, channel distribution, and automation, while Isidoro’s offerings remain unverified in current hotel contexts. Are you willing to trust a new or untested platform over a well-reviewed system with a demonstrated track record?

Is Counter or Isidoro Better for Hotels?

Counter and Isidoro aim to streamline property operations, but their market relevance differs greatly. Counter’s extensive feature set, including channel management, payment processing, and automated night audits, is tailored for small to mid-sized properties, especially hostels. It boasts 54 reviews with a 4.73/5 rating, and no recent negative feedback, indicating strong ongoing support and development.

In contrast, Isidoro’s absence of recent reviews and zero verified integrations or user feedback make it an uncertain choice. Without user validation, it’s impossible to gauge whether Isidoro can handle complex hotel operations or scale effectively.

Would you prefer a platform with proven performance and active support, or are you considering an untested option with no recent market validation?

Counter vs Isidoro: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a reliable PMS that handles multiple revenue streams, offers comprehensive automation, and supports integration with popular booking channels, Counter is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface and high customer support scores make onboarding smoother, especially for hostels and small hotels.

If your primary goal is leveraging AI-driven review analysis and insights—assuming Isidoro delivers on its AI promises—you might consider it. But with no recent reviews or proven features, Isidoro's suitability remains speculative. Counter’s extensive feature set and verified integrations make it the safer, more dependable platform.

Are you looking for a trusted, feature-rich PMS or a platform still in development and validation stages?

Is Counter or Isidoro Easier to Use?

Counter’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.6/5, with team reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Many users highlight how staff can learn it swiftly, with straightforward navigation and mobile compatibility, which is crucial for busy hostel environments.

Isidoro offers no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability. Without a performance record, it’s uncertain whether it will be simple enough for your team to adopt comfortably.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Isidoro?

Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. Its comprehensive suite lets you manage reservations, revenues, and operations from a single platform.

Isidoro has no verified features or integrations listed, making it impossible to compare on this front. Its lack of documented capabilities leaves its functionality and value in question.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Isidoro?

Counter’s support is rated at 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and dedicated staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers appreciate the responsiveness, even during urgent issues like booking errors or bugs.

Isidoro has no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support, Counter’s high score is a significant advantage.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Isidoro?

Counter features integrations with seven verified partners, including leading platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Goki, and others. These integrations facilitate seamless payments, channel distribution, and access control.

Isidoro has no listed or verified integrations. Without supported partners or documented integrations, it’s limited in connecting with other essential hotel systems.

Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Isidoro?

Counter’s 54 recent reviews with a 4.73/5 rating indicate strong user satisfaction. Hoteliers in the hostel segment specifically praise its simplicity, automation, and support responsiveness, with many citing it as highly reliable.

Isidoro lacks any recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific performance.

Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Isidoro Cost?

Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but no-trial, no-implementation fees suggest it’s tailored to small properties and hostels, with flexible options likely. Isidoro provides no available pricing information, suggesting it may be in early development or not yet commercially available.

Given Counter’s established presence and transparent pricing model, it offers a clearer understanding of its value proposition.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that primarily operate as hostels, hostels with integrated booking management, or small boutique properties seeking ease of use.
  • Teams that want quick onboarding and minimal training for staff.
  • Hotels seeking integration with popular booking channels and payment systems.
  • Properties that value automation, especially night audits and revenue tracking.

Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management, multi-property oversight, or complex group booking features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Isidoro?

  • Hotels that are interested in AI-driven review analysis and insights.
  • Teams focusing on reputation management and customer satisfaction strategies.
  • Hotels in early development stages, looking for a customizable platform.
  • Properties that can afford to wait for proven features and integrations.

Not ideal if you need a proven, supported PMS with recent reviews or extensive operational features.

Counter vs Isidoro: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter stands out as a proven, feature-rich PMS with a strong user base, recent reviews, and active support. Its extensive integrations and tailored features make it suitable for small hotels, hostels, and boutique properties aiming for operational efficiency.

Isidoro, lacking recent validation, offers no verifiable features or support data. Its AI focus might appeal to hotels prioritizing review insights, but without market proof, it remains a risky choice.

Choose Counter if you want a reliable, widely supported platform with a track record. Consider Isidoro only if your hotel is in the early stages of digital transformation and willing to experiment with unverified tools.

Counter 和 Isidoro 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter Isidoro

Counter 有哪些 Isidoro 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Isidoro 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter Isidoro
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 Isidoro:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
Isidoro
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 Isidoro 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 Isidoro?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Isidoro 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Isidoro 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 Isidoro 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。Isidoro:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 Isidoro?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Isidoro 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息