The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
isystems |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
isystems |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
isystems |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and isystems by isystems largely hinges on your property's needs and your operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but Counter specifically targets hostels with a focus on intuitive, easy-to-use features, while isystems is geared toward property managers handling multiple property types with a broader suite of financial and operational tools. Your decision should consider the scale of your property, your team’s tech comfort, and your integration needs.
Counter has established itself as a top-rated PMS for hostels, boasting a high review count and recent positive feedback. Conversely, isystems, despite its comprehensive offering, lacks recent reviews or clear hotel-specific ratings, making Counter the more reliable choice today.
Counter’s primary strength lies in its focus on hostel management, offering features like channel management, booking engine, and housekeeping modules tailored for small to mid-sized hostels. It’s designed for simplicity, with an interface that loads easily on mobile browsers, making it ideal for hostel staff on the go.
isystems, on the other hand, caters to property managers overseeing multiple property types, including long-term rentals and real estate portfolios. Its interface appears less tailored for hospitality and more suited for property management at scale, emphasizing tenant communication and financial reporting.
Given Counter’s high overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, and isystems' lack of recent or hotel-focused reviews, Counter clearly holds more current, hotel-specific reputation. Does this mean Counter is better suited for your hotel? Likely, yes, if your focus is on hostel or small property management.
If your hotel is a hostel, boutique inn, or inn, Counter’s specific features like channel management, online booking, and guest CRM make it a natural fit. Its user-friendly design and mobile-friendly interface are ideal if your team values ease of use and quick onboarding, especially with staff who may not be highly tech-savvy.
Conversely, if your property management needs extend beyond front desk operations to include rent collection, tenant communication, maintenance, and financial oversight, isystems may be better suited. It’s designed for property management at a larger scale, with features supporting multi-property portfolios and detailed financial reporting.
For small, guest-focused properties, Counter’s focus on hospitality simplifies daily operations. Larger property portfolios or those requiring extensive financial management will find isystems’ broader management tools more aligned with their needs.
Counter’s interface scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its simplicity, intuitive layout, and quick staff onboarding. Hoteliers highlight its easy-to-understand calendar and management tools, making training new staff straightforward.
isystems, however, has no recent reviews or specific usability ratings available, which introduces uncertainty about its user experience. Its platform appears more complex, designed for property managers with multiple assets, possibly requiring more training and onboarding.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, group booking functionality, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features directly support small to mid-sized properties seeking automation and streamlined guest management.
isystems offers a broader suite of property management functions, including tenant communication, rent collection, maintenance requests, and financial reporting. Its feature set is geared toward real estate management, not specifically hospitality, and lacks the hotel-centric tools Counter provides.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support rating is outstanding at 4.96/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses from support staff like Evelyn and Max. Users frequently mention the responsiveness and professionalism of Counter’s team as a key advantage.
isystems provides no recent reviews or ratings, leaving a gap in current customer support assessment. Without recent, hotel-specific feedback, Counter’s support reputation clearly surpasses that of isystems.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, facilitating payments, channel management, and access control. These integrations are crucial for smooth operations and revenue flow.
isystems has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools. For hoteliers seeking a PMS that can fit into an existing tech stack, Counter’s active integrations give it a distinct advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews, with a score of 4.73/5 and 54 recent reviews, indicate strong satisfaction among hostel and boutique hotel owners, particularly regarding ease of use and support. Hoteliers often cite its simplicity and efficiency as decisive factors.
isystems, lacking recent reviews, offers no current data on user satisfaction. Given the active, positive feedback for Counter, it’s clear hoteliers rate Counter higher.
Edge: Counter.
Neither Counter nor isystems disclose specific pricing publicly. They do not offer freemium plans, and no trial information is available, making precise comparisons difficult. Expect pricing to be tailored based on property size and feature requirements.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter’s core strength lies in its targeted design for hostels and small hotels, with a focus on ease of use, automation, and guest management. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it a reliable choice for properties seeking a straightforward PMS.
If your hotel needs a system that supports multi-property management, extensive financial reporting, and tenant functions, isystems may be suitable. However, its lack of recent reviews and hotel-specific features place it behind Counter in current hotel-focused evaluations.
For most hoteliers today, especially those managing hostels or boutique properties, Counter’s dedicated features, recent high ratings, and active support make it the better choice. Unless your property operates at a scale requiring complex real estate management, Counter is the recommended platform.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 isystems 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 isystems 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。isystems:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,isystems 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问