The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Jaras by Jaras hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Counter, with its proven track record, has a strong foothold in the hostel market, offering a user-friendly PMS with integrated channel management and automation features. Jaras, on the other hand, is a newer platform that promises a centralized, all-in-one cloud-native system suited for larger, multi-property operators seeking extensive automation and distribution.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature depth, and market presence. As a hoteliers, your decision should reflect your current operational complexity, budget, and growth plans. Are you looking for a stable, proven system or a modern platform with broad automation capabilities?
Counter boasts a rating of 4.73 out of 5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a high customer support score of 4.96. It’s especially favored by hostels and small hotels for its ease of use, robust integration options, and automation features, making it a reliable choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and support.
Jaras’s review count is zero, which indicates limited market presence and user feedback. Its pricing is higher at $1,000 per month, and it lacks verified integrations, making it less accessible for small or emerging hotels. Given current data and recent reviews, Counter is the stronger choice for most hoteliers today, especially those in the hostel segment.
Counter is designed specifically for hostel operations, emphasizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and mobile management, which resonates with small to mid-sized hostels. Its intuitive interface, rated 4.6/5, and dedicated features like Guest CRM, automated night audits, and multi-currency support make daily management smoother.
Jaras, however, targets larger properties or portfolios with its comprehensive automation, real-time status updates, and extensive distribution across over 150 channels. Its focus on financial workflows and operational automation suits scale but lacks the proven user experience and recent reviews Counter benefits from.
With Counter’s more recent and plentiful user feedback, it’s clear that it is better suited for small to medium hotels and hostels. Jaras’s lack of reviews and limited global presence also reduce its reliability for most hoteliers today.
Edge: Counter
Counter offers a suite of 10 features exclusive to its platform, including payment processing, booking engine, group functionality, automated night audits, a mobile app, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. It’s well-suited for hostels needing versatile tools to streamline operations and revenue.
Jaras provides 7 unique features, emphasizing real-time status updates, digital registration, guest messaging, revenue management, and automation of housekeeping and maintenance. It’s built for large-scale properties that require extensive automation and distribution.
Counter’s feature set is more comprehensive for small to mid-sized properties, especially with automation and POS integration highlighted in reviews. Jaras’s automation and distribution features are promising but lack the same proven depth and recent user validation.
Edge: Counter
Counter’s support team scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with reviewers praising their responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers appreciate quick, helpful responses — especially from team members like Evelyn and Max — and see support as a key strength.
Jaras currently has no publicly available reviews on customer support, which makes assessing its service levels difficult. Without verified user feedback, Counter’s support edge is clear.
Edge: Counter
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including well-known systems like Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki. These integrations facilitate smooth operations and revenue management across multiple platforms.
Jaras has no verified integrations, which limits its connectivity options for now. For hotels relying on existing channel managers and payment systems, Counter’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage.
Edge: Counter
Counter enjoys a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and automation features. Its core user base—mainly hostels—rates it highly for simplicity and reliability.
Jaras has no reviews, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. Without recent or substantial feedback, Counter’s higher rating indicates broader market acceptance and proven performance.
Edge: Counter
Counter does not publicly list a price, suggesting a flexible, possibly tiered or quote-based model suited to small and large properties. Its free PMS model, combined with integrated paid features like channel management, makes it attractive for budget-conscious hostels.
Jaras’s flat fee is $1,000/month, which may be prohibitive for small properties but offers an all-in-one solution for larger operators. The lack of transparent pricing for Counter makes direct comparison difficult, but its flexible model and proven value suggest better affordability for most.
Counter’s simplicity, automation, and support make it ideal for small, budget-conscious hostels and boutique properties. It’s less suited for large chains needing extensive revenue analytics or multi-property management.
Bullets:
Jaras’s comprehensive automation and distribution features suit scalable, multi-property operations aiming for digital transformation. Its higher price point and newer market presence are less attractive for small or budget-sensitive hotels.
Bullets:
Counter is a mature, well-reviewed PMS built for small to medium properties, especially hostels. Its ease of use, extensive integrations, and responsive support make it a reliable choice for hoteliers seeking quick deployment and operational simplicity.
Jaras promises a unified, cloud-native platform capable of automating extensive operations for larger properties. However, its lack of recent reviews, limited integrations, and higher price point make it a less proven choice today.
For most hotels and hostels, Counter offers a more tested, support-rich solution that aligns with current operational needs. Jaras may appeal to larger, tech-forward portfolios willing to invest in a future-proof but less validated platform.
Edge: Counter
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Jaras 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jaras 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Jaras:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Jaras 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问