The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Jazhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Jazhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Jazhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Jazhotel by Jazhotel hinges on your property’s specific needs and your expectations for support, features, and regional presence. Counter, with its 54 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, offers a well-rounded PMS tailored mostly for hostels and small hotels, and it scores high for ease of use and customer support. Jazhotel, however, has no recent reviews or user data, making it difficult to assess its effectiveness or suitability.
Counter’s comprehensive feature set and extensive integrations give it an edge for hotels seeking an established, versatile platform. Jazhotel’s lack of review data and regional presence makes it a less certain choice. So, do you prioritize proven performance and support, or are you open to exploring newer options without recent user feedback?
Counter is a mature PMS designed specifically for hostels and small properties, boasting 54 recent reviews and a robust 4.73/5 rating. It provides an array of features like channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and automation tools, with high scores for ease of use (4.6/5), support (4.96/5), and value (4.8/5). Customers praise its intuitive interface and quick support, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max.
Jazhotel, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or publicly available detailed feedback. Its lack of user ratings or feedback makes it impossible to evaluate its functionality, support, or customer satisfaction. Without recent reviews, Jazhotel’s reliability and feature effectiveness remain unverified.
Given the current data, Counter’s well-documented track record makes it the more reliable choice for hotels needing proven PMS capabilities. Do you want to risk adopting an unreviewed platform when Counter has verified performance?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small property in need of an affordable, easy-to-use PMS with essential automation and integrations, Counter is the clear pick. Its existing user base of hostels in multiple regions and a high recommendation rate (91%) demonstrate reliability and satisfaction among similar properties.
If your hotel is larger or in a region where Counter’s presence and integrations are less established, or if you’re open to testing less proven platforms, Jazhotel might be worth exploring. However, without recent reviews or proven performance, Counter remains the safer, more dependable option for most small hotels and hostels.
In summary, choose Counter if you value proven support, a wide feature set, and an established track record. Consider Jazhotel only if you have specific reasons to believe in its potential, despite the lack of recent data.
Counter’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.6/5, with users describing its interface as simple, intuitive, and quick to learn — even for staff without prior experience. The onboarding process is rated at 4.7/5, with many users mentioning how fast and smooth it was to implement, particularly for hostel environments.
Jazhotel offers no publicly available ratings or user feedback, so assessing its usability is impossible. Without customer reviews, it’s unclear whether Jazhotel’s interface matches Counter’s ease of adoption or if it requires a steep learning curve.
Given Counter’s high usability scores and positive user comments, it clearly leads in this area. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, group booking, and multi-currency support, among others. Its feature depth supports day-to-day operations for hostels and small hotels, with many users praising its automation and management tools.
Jazhotel does not currently list any specific features or integrations, making it impossible to compare functionalities directly. Without documented features, Jazhotel cannot be considered a comparable option.
Counter’s extensive feature set makes it the superior choice for properties needing a comprehensive, all-in-one PMS. Edge: Counter.
Customer support at Counter is rated at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Users frequently mention how support staff go above and beyond, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Jazhotel has no recent reviews or detailed feedback about its support services. Its support quality and responsiveness are therefore unverified, making it difficult to count on for critical issues.
Counter’s proven, highly-rated support makes it the clear leader here. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Goki, and Stripe. These integrations facilitate revenue management, online booking, and payment processing, helping streamline operations.
Jazhotel has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools and platforms. This significantly restricts its flexibility and potential for expansion.
Counter’s established integrations provide a substantial advantage, especially for properties that rely on multiple platforms. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews and overall rating of 4.73/5 reflect a high level of satisfaction among small and hostel properties, with 91% likelihood to recommend and positive comments about usability and support. Its review volume (54 reviews in the last six months) indicates active, ongoing user engagement.
Jazhotel has no recent reviews or user ratings, so it cannot be rated or compared effectively. Its user satisfaction remains unverified.
Based on available data, Counter is clearly the more trusted and highly-rated option. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list its pricing but operates on a paid model without a free tier or trial. Its pricing is likely based on property size and feature needs, but specific costs are unavailable.
Jazhotel has no publicly available pricing information, making it impossible to compare costs directly.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your best approach is to contact Counter for a quote, while Jazhotel’s cost remains unknown.
Not ideal if:
Counter is best suited for small-scale operations needing an easy, reliable PMS.
Not ideal if:
Jazhotel’s lack of reviews and demonstrated functionality make it a risky choice for most established properties.
Counter is an established, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, especially for hostels and small hotels. Its strengths lie in its ease of use, support, integrations, and extensive feature set, supported by recent reviews and high ratings.
Jazhotel, lacking recent reviews and detailed features, remains an unverified option. Without user feedback or regional presence, it’s difficult to recommend Jazhotel confidently.
For most hotels, especially those seeking stability and proven performance, Counter is the safer, smarter investment. Choose Counter if you want a reliable, well-supported PMS; consider Jazhotel only if you’re willing to test an unproven platform with no recent feedback.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Jazhotel 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jazhotel 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Jazhotel:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Jazhotel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问