The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Kross Booking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 1 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Kross Booking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Kross Booking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline property management but diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Counter, with its focus on hostels and extensive review backing, offers a more proven platform, whereas Kross Booking presents a broader scope of functionalities but with fewer reviews and less recent feedback. Which system aligns better with your strategic goals?
Counter by Counter emerges as the stronger choice owing to its higher review count, more recent feedback, and proven track record in the hostel segment. Its 54 reviews in the last six months and a 4.73/5 overall rating make it a reliable, well-supported platform. Kross Booking, with only one review and no recent feedback, cannot match the confidence level but might appeal to specialized vacation rental operators if its features align.
Counter is designed primarily for hostels and small accommodations, making it ideal if your property is in this segment. It has a focus on simple operations with an intuitive interface, extensive integrations, and automation features. Kross Booking, on the other hand, targets vacation rentals and villas, offering a broad set of features like online check-ins, owner settlements, and guest communication tools, but with fewer reviews and limited regional presence.
Counter’s strengths lie in its ease of use, proven support, and mature integrations, suitable for small to mid-sized hostel operations. Conversely, Kross Booking’s comprehensive feature set caters to vacation rental managers seeking advanced operational tools. Which platform is better suited to your property type and growth plans?
Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating at 4.6/5, with many reviewers praising its intuitive, simple interface that minimizes training time. Users highlight its mobile-friendly design, making it easy to manage operations on the go. Kross Booking scores slightly lower at 4/5 but is also generally regarded as user-friendly, with a visual interface and quick onboarding. However, limited recent reviews reduce confidence in its current usability.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeping, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and automated night audits—functions that are critical for small-scale, multi-operation properties. Its integrated POS system further enhances revenue management. Kross Booking, while rich in functionalities like online check-in, owner portals, and guest messaging, does not currently list as many distinct features or integrations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers commending its fast, responsive assistance, particularly citing team members like Evelyn and Max. Many find support to be proactive and helpful, though some report slower responses in certain time zones. Kross Booking receives a perfect 5/5 rating, but with only one recent review, confidence in support quality is limited. The sole review lauds quick training and support, yet the lack of ongoing feedback makes this less conclusive.
Edge: Counter.
Counter provides integration with seven verified partners, including notable platforms like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, and GOKI. These integrations facilitate channel management, online payments, and access control, creating a cohesive operational environment. Kross Booking has no listed verified integrations, limiting its connectivity with other systems. For hotels relying on multi-platform operations, Counter’s broader integration ecosystem is a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.73/5 reflect strong satisfaction across various hotel types, especially hostels and independent properties. Reviewers laud its ease of use, automation, and support responsiveness, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Kross Booking’s single review lacks enough data to determine user satisfaction but indicates high praise for its comprehensiveness. Given the review volume and consistency, Counter’s ratings are more reliable.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not list explicit pricing details, suggesting a custom quote approach. Counter’s absence of a free tier or transparent pricing indicates it might be tailored for specific property sizes or needs. Kross Booking’s beta status implies potential future costs, but currently, no pricing is available. Your hotel should contact each provider directly for tailored quotes.
Not ideal if your property requires complex revenue management or extensive OTA connectivity beyond what Counter offers.
Not ideal if your focus is on small hostels or properties that require extensive regional integrations or proven stability.
Counter by Counter is a mature, well-reviewed PMS designed for small to mid-sized hostels and similar properties. Its high review count, ease of use, and robust integrations make it a dependable choice for properties prioritizing operational simplicity and support. Its extensive feature set supports daily management, automation, and revenue tracking, making it suitable for busy, small-scale hotels.
Kross Booking offers a versatile platform with many advanced features tailored toward vacation rentals and larger properties. Its capabilities in online check-in, owner management, and guest communication are appealing, especially for operators seeking a unified management system. However, with only one recent review, its reliability and support remain less certain.
If your hotel emphasizes stability, proven features, and a broad support ecosystem, Counter is the clear winner. Choose Counter if you want a trusted, high-rated platform with extensive integrations and ongoing development. If your property leans toward vacation rentals or requires specific features that Kross Booking offers, consider it, but be aware of its limited review data.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Kross Booking |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Kross Booking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Kross Booking |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Kross Booking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Kross Booking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Kross Booking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Kross Booking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问