The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
KrossBooking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 KrossBooking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Your team is evaluating two property management systems: Counter by Counter and KrossBooking by KrossBooking. Both aim to streamline your operations, but Counter is a dedicated PMS built specifically for hostels, while KrossBooking positions itself as a broader hospitality management tool. Counter boasts a comprehensive feature set, high user ratings, and active regional presence, unlike KrossBooking, which has no recent reviews or verified integrations. Which product will truly meet your needs?
Counter is a PMS designed primarily for hostels, with an all-in-one approach that combines channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and housekeeping modules. Its user base is heavily skewed toward hostels, with 83% of reviews coming from that segment, and it has a 4.73/5 rating based on 54 recent reviews, highlighting widespread satisfaction.
KrossBooking, in contrast, offers a centralized reservation system with AI-driven insights but has no recent reviews or verified customer feedback. Without recent data, it's difficult to gauge its real-world performance or how well it integrates into hotel workflows. Do you prioritize proven user feedback and active regional support?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations, go with Counter. Its broad feature set includes channel management, booking engine, payments, automated reports, and multi-currency support—features that are critical for busy properties.
On the other hand, if your hotel is seeking a flexible, possibly AI-enhanced system with future potential but no current reviews to confirm its reliability, KrossBooking might appeal. However, the lack of recent reviews and verified integrations puts its suitability into question. Given the data, Counter offers a safer, more tested option for hotels.
Counter scores exceptionally high on ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating and positive reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Users highlight how quickly staff can learn the system and how well it supports remote management, with many reviews emphasizing simple calendar views and straightforward operations.
KrossBooking’s usability remains unverified due to the absence of recent customer feedback. Without concrete ratings or reviews, it’s impossible to compare ease of use confidently.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a dedicated channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, housekeepings, group bookings, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, automated night audits, guest CRM, and ancillary revenue tracking. This extensive set is designed specifically for hostels and small hotels seeking all-in-one management.
KrossBooking provides no detailed feature list or differentiation points in the available data, making it impossible to compare feature depth or uniqueness. Based on available data, Counter’s feature set is significantly more comprehensive.
Edge: Counter.
Counter has a remarkable 4.96/5 support rating with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users frequently mention staff like Evelyn and Max as professional, quick to respond, and attentive to issues, especially in critical operational moments.
KrossBooking provides no recent reviews or verified customer support ratings, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without user feedback, Counter clearly has the advantage here.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations allow for comprehensive operations, from online payments to channel management, enhancing your property’s connectivity.
KrossBooking has no verified integrations listed, raising questions about its ability to connect with your existing systems. Counter’s verified partner network provides a decisive edge.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews demonstrate consistent high ratings, especially among hostels, with a 4.75/5 average from 52 reviews. Users praise its simplicity, support, and automation, contributing to a 91% likelihood to recommend, with recent reviews confirming continued satisfaction.
KrossBooking lacks recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive it. Based on available data, Counter is the more trusted choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not specify pricing publicly, but there are no implementation fees or monthly charges mentioned—likely a custom quote based on your property's needs. KrossBooking’s pricing details are also unavailable, suggesting a need for direct inquiry.
Given the lack of transparent pricing data for both, expect to contact vendors for tailored quotes, but Counter’s transparent feature set suggests easier budget planning.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter is a well-established PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction. Its broad integration network and support ratings make it a reliable choice for properties looking for an all-in-one management platform.
KrossBooking appears to be a nascent, less proven system, lacking recent reviews and verified integrations, which makes it a riskier option at this stage. Its focus on AI and automation may appeal in the future but currently lacks the confidence of proven performance.
If your hotel values reliability, comprehensive features, and strong support, Counter is the clear choice. For innovative experimentation and if you're comfortable with less validation, KrossBooking might be worth exploring further, but only with direct vendor confirmation of capabilities.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
KrossBooking |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 KrossBooking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
KrossBooking |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 KrossBooking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 KrossBooking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。KrossBooking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,KrossBooking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问