The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #68 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | #50 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | #29 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #52 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | #58 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #66 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #9 6 条评价 |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and kwentra by Kwentra hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter is designed explicitly for hostels and small accommodations, while kwentra caters to a broader range of hotel types, including resorts and boutique hotels. This fundamental difference shapes their core strengths and limitations.
Counter offers a free, user-friendly PMS tailored for hostel operations, focusing on simplicity and ease of use. Kwentra, on the other hand, provides a more extensive, feature-rich environment suitable for hotels seeking detailed control and integration. Which system aligns better with your current challenges and future growth plans?
Counter by Counter is a free, easy-to-navigate PMS built primarily for hostels and small properties. Its focus on simplicity makes it ideal if your team struggles with complex systems or needs rapid onboarding. Counter’s mobile-friendly design and straightforward calendar management appeal to facilities emphasizing quick check-ins and quick access from anywhere.
Kwentra by Kwentra, however, offers a comprehensive ecosystem with 28 unique features not available in Counter, such as integrated CRS, revenue management, online check-in/out, and digital registration. It is better suited for hotels that require detailed control over reservations, pricing, and operations, especially properties with multiple revenue streams or complex operational needs. Do you need a lean system or a feature-packed management suite?
Counter scores notably higher for ease of use with a 4.6/5 rating, backed by its simple, intuitive interface tailored for hostel staff. Its onboarding process is rated 4.7/5, and users praise its straightforward navigation and quick staff adoption, especially in hostel settings where minimal training is preferred.
Kwentra earns a slightly higher 4.83/5 for user-friendliness, with a more detailed interface that may require more time for staff to master. However, its comprehensive features are well-organized, making it accessible for hotel teams experienced with more complex systems. Edge: Counter.
Kwentra offers 28 unique features, including an integrated CRS, EPoS, revenue management, online check-in/out, ID scanning, and automated space optimization, providing a deep operational toolkit. Counter, by comparison, has only 19 core features, focusing on essential PMS functions like reservations, POS integration, and automation for small properties.
Counter excels in core PMS functions and simplicity, but kwentra’s extensive feature set caters to hotels needing detailed control over pricing, distribution, and guest engagement. For properties seeking comprehensive management, kwentra’s feature count gives it the edge.
Edge: Kwentra.
Counter’s support is consistently praised, with a 4.96/5 rating and specific mentions of staff like Evelyn and Max for their quick, helpful responses. Reviews highlight their responsiveness and willingness to implement ongoing improvements, making support a key strength.
Kwentra’s support scores 4.83/5, with users also praising their helpfulness and quick response times. However, since Counter’s reviews are more recent and numerous, their support experience reflects a slightly more consistent high standard. Edge: Counter.
Kwentra integrates with 18 verified partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Expedia, and Yanolja Cloud, plus a variety of systems for revenue, POS, and guest management. Counter’s seven verified partners include key integrations such as Stripe, Goki, and a few channel managers, with SiteMinder also among them.
While kwentra’s broader ecosystem allows more comprehensive operational connections, Counter’s focused integrations cover essential channels and payment systems. If extensive third-party connectivity is crucial, kwentra has the advantage; otherwise, Counter’s core integrations suffice.
Edge: Kwentra.
Counter boasts a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 reviews, primarily from hostel operators in Europe, North America, and Asia. Hoteliers appreciate its simplicity, fast support, and ease of onboarding, with a notable 91% likelihood to recommend.
Kwentra has a perfect 5/5 rating based on only 6 reviews, mainly from boutique and resort properties in the Middle East and Africa. Its higher rating is partly due to its extensive feature set, but the limited review count makes it less representative.
Given the recency and volume, Counter’s ratings are more reliable and indicative of its consistent performance. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed but are known to be free, making it highly accessible, especially for small hostels or startups with limited budgets. The absence of a paid tier simplifies decision-making for budget-conscious properties.
Kwentra also does not publicly list prices, but its more advanced features typically imply a subscription-based model suited for mid-sized or larger hotels. The price likely scales with the level of access to its extensive features.
Both systems are free or subscription-based but lack transparent pricing details; your specific costs will depend on your property’s size and needs.
Not ideal if your property:
Counter is best for small, budget-conscious hostels prioritizing simplicity.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Kwentra suits hotels seeking a full-stack management ecosystem with advanced automation and control.
Counter stands out as a streamlined, cost-effective solution built specifically for hostels and small properties. Its core strengths lie in ease of use, fast onboarding, and responsive customer support, all backed by a sizable user base and recent positive reviews.
Kwentra offers a broad array of features, integrations, and automation options designed for mid-sized and larger hotels. Its extensive ecosystem enables detailed operational control but comes with a steeper learning curve and higher complexity.
If your hotel values simplicity, affordability, and quick deployment, Counter is the clear choice. If you require a full-featured system capable of supporting complex operations and multiple integrations, kwentra is the better fit.
In conclusion, for most small hotels and hostels, Counter’s more recent reviews and higher overall ratings make it a more reliable and proven solution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 kwentra 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 kwentra 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。kwentra:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 16,Kwentra 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案