Counter vs. Lodgable: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 15, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

Lodgable 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 Lodgable 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 Lodgable 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Lodgable 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter Lodgable
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 Lodgable:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter Lodgable
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter Lodgable
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter Lodgable
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Lodgable by Lodgable hinges on your property type, operational needs, and growth plans. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s extensive feature set and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. Lodgable’s lack of recent reviews and limited features suggest it’s less suited for dynamic hotel operations. Are you ready to see which fits your property best?

Is Counter or Lodgable Better for Hotels?

Counter excels with a dedicated focus on hostels and small hotels, boasting 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and support. Lodgable, with no recent reviews and an unlisted overall rating, appears to lack the active user base and recent validation necessary for hotelier confidence. Given the active reviews and high scores, Counter’s reputation is stronger, but does that mean it’s the right fit for your property?

Both products address basic management needs—booking, guest info, and operations—but Counter offers 19 unique features like channel management, payment processing, and group booking modules, which Lodgable does not list. While Lodgable emphasizes simplicity and automation, it’s unclear if it offers the depth of functionality modern hotels require. Do you need a full-featured PMS or a simpler tool?

Is Counter or Lodgable Easier to Use?

Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5, supported by 54 reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface and quick staff onboarding, with users describing it as “easy to learn” and “very friendly." In contrast, Lodgable has no recent reviews or formal ratings, leaving its usability unverified. The absence of recent user feedback on Lodgable’s interface makes it difficult to assess; however, the lack of active reviews suggests limited adoption or support.

Counter’s onboarding ratings of 4.7/5 and the positive comments about its straightforward navigation strongly favor it. If ease of use is critical for your team’s quick onboarding and daily management, Counter clearly has the edge here.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Lodgable?

Counter’s 19 exclusive features include a channel manager, payment processing, online booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—features critical for operational efficiency. Lodgable, by comparison, offers no listed exclusive features, implying a more limited feature set focused on basic management.

Counter’s comprehensive toolkit supports complex operations, multiple revenue streams, and multi-lingual, multi-currency transactions, giving you greater flexibility. If advanced features and extensive integrations matter, Counter is the clear winner.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Lodgable?

Counter’s customer support scores a 4.96/5, with recent reviews highlighting its “fast, reachable support” and staff like Evelyn and Max, praised for their professionalism. Many users mention their support team’s responsiveness, even during system bugs or feature requests.

Lodgable offers no recent reviews or explicit support ratings, indicating a lack of recent customer feedback. This absence suggests it may not provide the same level of active support and responsiveness. For reliable, responsive assistance, Counter’s support team is the stronger choice.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Lodgable?

Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major channel managers and payment gateways like Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki. These integrations enable streamlined operations across multiple platforms, centralizing income and simplifying guest management.

Lodgable has no listed verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools and platforms. If your operation depends on multiple integrations, Counter’s broader ecosystem is advantageous.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Lodgable?

Counter’s reviews consistently rate the platform highly across segments, with a 4.75/5 in the hostel category and a 91% likelihood to recommend, supported by recent, positive feedback. Lodgable, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be reliably rated by users.

For properties like hostels, boutique hotels, and city-center hotels, Counter’s proven user satisfaction makes it the safer bet. The absence of recent Lodgable reviews suggests it’s not actively used or trusted by hoteliers today.

How Much Do Counter and Lodgable Cost?

Counter does not list explicit pricing, but it’s a paid product without a freemium model. Lodgable’s pricing details are also unavailable, implying it either lacks transparent pricing or operates on a custom quote basis.

Given the active support and extensive features of Counter, expect a typical SaaS pricing model, while Lodgable’s unclear pricing suggests limited market presence or a smaller user base.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that need a robust, feature-rich PMS, including channel management, payment processing, and group bookings.
  • Hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and reliable support.
  • Properties looking for integrations with third-party platforms like Stripe or Channel Managers.
  • Small to medium-sized hotels or hostels aiming for streamlined operations.
  • Teams that benefit from automation, reporting, and multi-currency management.

Not ideal if you’re a large hotel chain seeking enterprise-scale solutions or if budget constraints limit spending on PMS.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Lodgable?

  • Vacation rental owners managing multiple listings needing centralization.
  • Hosts seeking a simple, automated solution with easy daily management.
  • Small property managers prioritizing automation over extensive features.
  • Those who don’t require complex integrations or advanced revenue analytics.

Not ideal if you need a full-featured PMS with multiple integrations, detailed reporting, or active support.

Counter vs Lodgable: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter is a full-featured, actively supported PMS with a proven track record and a broad feature set tailored for hostels and small hotels. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its reliability and user satisfaction, making it the recommended choice.

Lodgable, with no recent reviews, limited features, and no listed integrations, appears more suited for individual vacation rental hosts rather than full-service hotels. If you seek a dependable, scalable management platform, Counter is the clear winner.

Counter’s extensive feature set, active user base, and strong support make it the better choice for hoteliers wanting a reliable operational backbone. Lodgable may appeal to very small or simple rental operations, but it’s less equipped for hotel management needs.

In conclusion, if your hotel requires a well-supported, feature-rich platform with proven reviews, go with Counter. If your operation is small, focused solely on vacation rentals with minimal complexity, Lodgable might suffice.

Counter 和 Lodgable 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter Lodgable

Counter 有哪些 Lodgable 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Lodgable 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter Lodgable
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 Lodgable:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
Lodgable
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 Lodgable 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 Lodgable?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Lodgable 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgable 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 Lodgable 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。Lodgable:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 Lodgable?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Lodgable 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息