The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Libra Hospitality 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Libra Hospitality 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency and guest satisfaction. Counter by Counter and Logus PMS by Libra Hospitality aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, user feedback, and market presence. Counter, with its extensive review base and recent positive scores, clearly leads in credibility and user satisfaction. Are you ready to see which system fits your property best?
Counter offers a host of functionalities tailored for hostels and small hotels, while Libra Hospitality’s Logus PMS targets broader hospitality settings. Their core mission—simplifying daily operations—may look similar on paper, but their actual performance and support differ markedly. Which of these products will support your hotel’s growth and operational needs?
Counter by Counter is a property management system specifically designed for hostels, with a focus on ease of use, automation, and integrations that streamline front desk and booking functions. It features over 19 unique modules, including channel management, payment processing, and guest CRM, all tailored for smaller properties. Libra Hospitality’s Logus PMS, however, remains largely unreviewed and invisible in recent market activity, making it difficult to gauge its true capabilities or user satisfaction.
Counter boasts a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood of recommendation. In contrast, Libra Hospitality has no recent reviews or scores, making Counter’s data far more reliable and current. Are you comfortable choosing a product with proven reviews, or is brand familiarity enough to sway you?
Counter's reviews highlight its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and outstanding customer support—rated 4.96/5—while Libra Hospitality offers no recent customer feedback to support its claims. This makes Counter a more trustworthy choice, especially as it is actively used and supported in multiple regions.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing an intuitive, easy-to-operate PMS with specific features like channel management, booking engine, and integrated payments, Counter is the clear pick. Its high review count and recent feedback show it’s a trusted tool among hostel operators, especially in Europe, North America, and beyond.
If your hotel operates in a broader hospitality sector—resorts, boutique hotels, or larger properties—and you seek a system with more complex property functions, Libra Hospitality’s Logus PMS might appeal. However, without recent reviews or a strong market presence, its suitability remains unverified.
For hoteliers prioritizing proven performance, user satisfaction, and ongoing support, Counter is the superior option. If your focus is on a less tested platform with potentially broader hotel industry features, Libra Hospitality could be worth exploring, but the lack of recent data raises questions.
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward, friendly interface, and quick staff onboarding. Users praise its mobile friendliness and minimal training needs, with comments like “easy to learn and teach,” and “fast setup.” Customer support is consistently rated 4.96/5, with reviewers mentioning staff like Evelyn and Max for their responsiveness.
Libra Hospitality’s Logus PMS does not currently have recent reviews or user ratings to compare. Its ease of use can’t be reliably assessed, but the lack of recent feedback suggests it may not be as refined or actively supported.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a built-in channel manager, booking engine, automated night audits, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are tailored for small properties and hostels, making daily operations straightforward.
Libra Hospitality’s Logus PMS has no publicly listed or verified features, making it impossible to compare feature sets directly. The absence of detailed feature information and recent reviews puts Counter ahead in this category.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team is highly praised, rated 4.96/5, with recent reviews highlighting their quick and helpful responses. Hoteliers say things like “Evelyn and Max are super helpful,” and “support is always there to help,” demonstrating consistent satisfaction.
Libra Hospitality provides no recent customer support reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. Without evidence of support effectiveness, Counter’s premium rating makes it the safer choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, and Goki. These integrations allow seamless payment, channel management, and access control, making it easier to connect with your existing systems.
Libra Hospitality has zero verified integrations and no publicly available partner list, limiting its connectivity options. For hotels seeking a system that plays well with other tools, Counter is clearly superior.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 total) show strong satisfaction across hotel segments, especially hostels, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 reviews. Hotels in regions like Europe and North America appreciate its ease of use and support.
Libra Hospitality has no recent reviews or ratings, rendering comparison impossible. Its absence of feedback indicates it’s untested and less trusted by users.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list pricing but does not offer a freemium model or trials. Its value appears tied to its features and support, making it suitable for properties willing to invest in quality.
Libra Hospitality’s pricing is also unavailable, and no trial info is provided. It’s likely a custom quote model, but without transparent costs or reviews, price shouldn’t be the primary reason to choose either.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter by Counter is a feature-rich, well-reviewed PMS built specifically for hostels and small hotels. Its proven track record, active customer support, and extensive integrations make it a reliable choice for properties seeking to streamline operations.
Libra Hospitality’s Logus PMS remains unreviewed and largely untested in recent years. Without user feedback or verification of features, its viability for your property remains uncertain.
If your hotel values experience, support, and proven performance, Counter is the clear winner. If you’re exploring options with no recent reviews, Libra Hospitality might be worth a trial, but caution is advised due to the lack of data.
Note: The review data emphasizes Counter’s dominance in recent feedback, supporting its position as the leading product for small and hostel properties.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Logus PMS by Libra Hospitality 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Logus PMS by Libra Hospitality 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Logus PMS by Libra Hospitality 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Logus PMS by Libra Hospitality:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Libra Hospitality 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问