The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
lucid |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
lucid |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
lucid |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs an intuitive interface, reliable support, and features that help streamline operations. Counter by Counter and lucid by lucid are both designed to manage bookings, guest information, and operational tasks, but they differ significantly in maturity, user base, and market presence. Counter, with its focus on hostels, boasts a robust feature set and a strong reputation among users, while lucid appears to be in earlier stages with limited reviews and unknown market penetration.
Are you looking for a proven, widely-used platform with comprehensive features or an emerging solution still establishing itself in the industry? Let’s compare their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide.
Counter by Counter is a mature PMS with over 54 recent reviews, primarily from hostel operators, and holds an impressive 4.73/5 overall rating. It offers a wide array of features, including channel management, booking engine, POS, and automated night audits, tailored largely for hostels and small properties.
lucid by lucid, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or visible market presence, making it difficult to gauge its reliability or feature set. It appears to be an AI-driven platform focusing on decision-making insights rather than operational management.
Given the data, Counter’s extensive user feedback and recent reviews make it the more dependable choice. Do you want a tried-and-true PMS or are you comfortable testing an unproven platform?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small property seeking a straightforward, feature-rich PMS, Counter is the clear winner. Its 4.73/5 rating from 54 recent reviews highlights consistent user satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support.
If, however, you are a larger hotel chain or property seeking advanced AI-driven analytics for decision support, lucid might appeal—though its lack of recent reviews and verified integrations make this uncertain. Counter’s established presence and proven features make it a safer, more practical choice for operational needs.
In summary, choose Counter if you prioritize reliability, comprehensive features, and positive recent feedback. Unless your focus is on strategic decision-making through AI insights, lucid remains an untested option.
Counter’s user interface is highly praised, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating based on 54 recent reviews. Hoteliers describe it as clear, simple, and quick to learn, enabling staff to adopt it rapidly with minimal training. Support staff are frequently commended for their responsiveness, with Evelyn and Max specifically mentioned for their professionalism.
lucid, lacking recent reviews or detailed user feedback, offers an unknown user experience. Its AI-driven approach may introduce complexity, or it could provide a streamlined interface; this is unclear due to the absence of recent data.
Edge: Counter.
Counter provides 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, housekeepings, CRM, multi-currency support, and automated night audits. These tools address daily operational needs and are highly valued by users seeking an integrated management system.
lucid has no listed features or integrations, suggesting it may lack operational management tools entirely. It seems to focus on analytics and decision support rather than core PMS functionalities.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Users often mention that support is available 24/7, which is crucial for resolving issues promptly.
lucid’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable, making it impossible to assess the quality or responsiveness of their assistance. Without recent feedback or verified support metrics, its support quality remains uncertain.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners including WuBook, SiteMinder, Stripe, and others, broadening its connectivity with OTAs, payment gateways, and access systems. These integrations directly enhance operational efficiency and revenue management.
lucid has no published integrations or partner list, indicating it may not offer operational integrations at this stage. Its focus on analytics suggests it might not serve as a full PMS platform.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.75/5 average rating from hostel operators, demonstrating strong satisfaction. Hotels of various types, especially hostels, find it intuitive, reliable, and support-rich.
lucid lacks recent reviews and user ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or hotel segment suitability. Its market presence appears limited to unknown or early-stage adoption.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, but Counter’s model involves no implementation fees, a monthly fee, and no freemium options. Its pricing likely reflects its mature feature set and support.
lucid’s pricing details are unavailable, possibly suggesting it’s still in development or testing phases, with unclear costs.
Not ideal if you require highly customized revenue management, advanced analytics, or large-scale enterprise features.
Not ideal if your focus is on daily operations, booking management, or proven industry integrations.
Counter’s core strength is its proven, full-featured PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, backed by 54 recent reviews and high support ratings. It simplifies daily operations and offers extensive integrations, making it a dependable choice.
lucid, while promising with its AI-driven approach, remains untested at scale, with no recent reviews or verified market presence. Its focus on analytics may eventually complement operational systems but currently offers uncertain value.
If you need a reliable, well-supported PMS with proven features, choose Counter. If you are experimenting with AI-driven decision tools and willing to accept less operational certainty, lucid could be considered—but only as a complementary tool, not a primary management system.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 lucid 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 lucid 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。lucid:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,lucid 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问