The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Mister Booking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Mister Booking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Mister Booking requires understanding the core problems each solves. Counter is a dedicated property management system tailored for hostels, offering extensive features and a strong reputation backed by recent reviews. Mister Booking, by contrast, presents itself as a broader booking and operations platform, but with no recent reviews or user feedback, its reliability remains uncertain.
Counter excels in usability, support, and regional presence, making it the more dependable choice for hotels prioritizing ease and support. However, Mister Booking may appeal if you're seeking an integrated system that covers multiple property types, though its lack of recent reviews casts doubt on current performance.
Counter is built specifically for hostel operators, focusing on simplicity, automation, and operational efficiency, making it ideal for small and medium hostels seeking a straightforward PMS. Mister Booking claims to streamline hotel, resort, and vacation rental management but offers no recent user reviews or measurable ratings, which makes assessing its effectiveness difficult.
Counter's recent reviews underline its high user satisfaction, especially in ease of use (4.6/5) and support (4.96/5). Mister Booking, however, lacks recent feedback entirely, leaving hoteliers unsure of its current functionality or customer service. Are you comfortable choosing a system without recent user validation?
The primary divergence is Counter’s proven track record with 54 recent reviews and a stellar overall rating of 4.73/5, versus Mister Booking’s absence of recent feedback. Do you want a trusted, reviewed system or are you willing to take a gamble on an unreviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a reliable PMS that integrates channel management, payment processing, and guest CRM functionalities in one platform, Counter is the clear choice. Its well-established presence among hostels, with a 91% recommendation rate and recent reviews, demonstrates its effectiveness.
If your operations span multiple property types and you're seeking a system that claims to cover broader hospitality management, Mister Booking might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews, no ratings, and no verifiable customer feedback, it’s difficult to justify over Counter.
For hotels prioritizing proven support, ease of use, and extensive feature sets, Counter is the safer, smarter option. Conversely, if you’re an innovator willing to risk unverified solutions, Mister Booking might warrant further investigation—but only with caution.
Counter boasts an impressive ease of use rating of 4.6/5, backed by 54 recent reviews from users who describe its interface as "clear, simple and easy to understand." Users frequently highlight how quickly staff can learn and operate Counter, with many praising its mobile-friendly design and intuitive calendar view.
In contrast, Mister Booking’s user experience is unverified due to the lack of recent reviews, leaving hoteliers unsure about its interface quality or onboarding process. Their absence of recent data makes it impossible to assess usability confidently.
Edge: Counter. Its high ratings and positive feedback on onboarding, staff training, and interface clarity make it the more user-friendly choice for your team.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—features most hoteliers find essential. Mister Booking, however, provides no publicly available feature list, and no verified features are documented.
Counter’s comprehensive suite, especially its integrated channel management and POS system, makes it a versatile tool for hostels and small hotels. Mister Booking’s lack of verifiable features leaves its capabilities in question, making Counter the more reliable and complete solution.
Edge: Counter. Its extensive feature set, including unique modules like group functionality and cloud-based management, surpasses the unknown scope of Mister Booking.
Counter’s support team scores a 4.96/5 based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and quick resolution times. Specific praise is directed toward team members Evelyn and Max, who are described as "always reachable" and "helpful" in troubleshooting.
Mister Booking has no recent reviews or support ratings available, rendering its customer service reputation uncertain. Without recent feedback, you risk relying on a support system that has not been validated.
Edge: Counter. Its high customer support rating and recent positive reviews demonstrate its commitment to assisting users effectively.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including prominent platforms like WuBook, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki, covering channel management, online payments, and access control. These integrations are frequently praised for streamlining operations and consolidating income sources.
Mister Booking offers no publicly verified integrations, and with zero verified partners, its ability to connect with other systems remains unproven. This limits its utility in a multi-platform environment.
Edge: Counter. Its confirmed integrations provide operational flexibility and ease of use, unlike Mister Booking’s unverified ecosystem.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in 6 months) showcase a high rating of 4.73/5 and a recommendation rate of 91%. Users across segments, especially hostels, highlight its simplicity, support, and automation as key strengths.
Mister Booking, lacking any recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on user satisfaction. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to determine how hotelier perceptions currently stand.
Edge: Counter. Its substantial recent review base and high ratings establish it as the more trusted, well-regarded platform among hoteliers.
Counter does not list explicit pricing but is described as a free PMS tailored for hostels, with no implementation fees, freemium options, or monthly charges. Its value lies in its features and support, which are highly rated.
Mister Booking also lacks detailed pricing information, and with no recent reviews, its cost structure remains unknown. This obscurity complicates direct comparisons of value.
In summary, both platforms’ pricing models are not transparent, but Counter’s free approach for hostel management makes it more accessible.
Not ideal if your property requires complex revenue management, extensive multi-property features, or advanced customization that Counter currently does not fully support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions where Mister Booking’s regional support or integrations are limited, or if you prefer platforms with established, recent user feedback.
Counter’s core advantage is its proven track record, extensive feature set, and high user satisfaction. Its focus on hostels and small hotels, combined with recent reviews, make it a dependable choice for properties seeking simplicity, automation, and support.
Mister Booking presents itself as a broad management platform but offers no recent validation of its performance or features. Without current reviews or verified integrations, it remains an unconfirmed option—potentially risky for your hotel’s operations.
If your hotel values reliability, support, and a proven feature set, Counter is the clear winner. If you’re exploring untested systems with broader ambitions, Mister Booking might be worth a cautious trial—though recent user feedback suggests it’s not yet a mature solution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Mister Booking |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Mister Booking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Mister Booking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mister Booking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Mister Booking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Mister Booking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问