The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
my-bookings 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 my-bookings 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
my-bookings |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
my-bookings |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
my-bookings |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
my-bookings |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and my-bookings by my-bookings hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its extensive feature set make it more suitable for dynamic, multi-channel environments. my-bookings, however, appears more generic, with no recent reviews or measurable performance data, which limits its reliability for your decision.
Counter offers a well-reviewed, feature-rich PMS with over 50 recent reviews, giving you confidence in its ongoing development and support. In contrast, my-bookings has no recent reviews or user feedback, making it harder to assess its current effectiveness. Do you prioritize proven performance backed by recent user experiences?
Counter is a specialized PMS designed for hostels, offering an all-in-one solution that includes channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and housekeeping modules. It’s trusted by over 50 hoteliers in diverse regions, with a 4.73/5 overall rating backed by recent reviews in the last six months, emphasizing its active user base.
my-bookings, on the other hand, lacks recent reviews or an established market presence, with no verified feedback from hotels in the last six months. Without recent user insights, it’s difficult to gauge its reliability or feature performance. Given the data, Counter’s active community and recent positive feedback make it the superior choice currently.
Would your hotel benefit from a platform already proven in your region with current user feedback?
If your hotel needs a dedicated, feature-rich PMS with strong channel management, automated revenue tools, and active support, go with Counter. Its extensive feature set—including POS integration, automated night audit, and multi-currency support—serves busy hostels and small hotels that need an all-in-one system.
If, however, your priority is a straightforward reservation platform without the need for advanced management tools or recent user feedback, you might consider my-bookings. Its lack of recent reviews and feature detail makes it less compelling, especially for properties seeking reliable, scalable management solutions.
In summary, Counter’s recent reviews and comprehensive features make it the clear leader for hotels seeking an established, reliable PMS. my-bookings’ lack of recent feedback and limited features suggest it’s not yet a mature option for your hotel.
Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5 based on 54 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, simple calendar views, and quick onboarding process rated at 4.7/5. Guests highlight how staff can learn the system quickly, reducing training time, and appreciate the mobile-friendly design.
my-bookings has no recent reviews or detailed user feedback available, making it impossible to assess its user interface or onboarding experience. The absence of data suggests it may lack the polish or community feedback needed to confirm ease of adoption.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. It also provides modules for housekeepings, group bookings, and role management, offering a comprehensive toolkit for hostel operations.
my-bookings provides no detailed feature list or recent updates, making it impossible to compare functionally. Its lack of verified features and absence from other integrations suggest it’s less capable than Counter’s established ecosystem.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with reviewers frequently praising its responsiveness, especially mention of team members like Evelyn and Max for their professionalism. Recent reviews describe support as quick, helpful, and proactive in addressing bugs and feature requests.
my-bookings has no recent reviews or specific feedback on support quality. Without current user insights, it’s impossible to validate its support responsiveness or effectiveness.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Channel Manager WuBook, Goki, Stripe, and others, facilitating seamless connectivity with major booking channels and payment processors. Its integration ecosystem supports a broad range of operational needs.
my-bookings has no verified integrations listed, and no recent activity suggests an active partner network. This limits its ability to connect with other platforms or enhance operational automation.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s hotel customer ratings are strong, with an overall score of 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, including several positive comments about ease of use and support. Its primary users—hostels and boutique hotels—value the platform’s simplicity and responsiveness.
my-bookings has no recent reviews or verifiable ratings, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction or property-specific feedback.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose a fixed price but offers a freemium model, with no implementation fees or monthly charges, making it adaptable for small hostels. Its value is reflected in its feature set and active support, likely translating into competitive pricing for its target segment.
my-bookings similarly does not specify pricing details or subscription models, leaving potential users without transparency on costs or value. The lack of pricing transparency favors Counter, which clearly outlines its model.
Not ideal if your hotel is very large and requires complex revenue management or highly customized booking solutions, as Counter’s reporting features are still developing.
Not ideal if your hotel requires active support, extensive integrations, or advanced management features, given the lack of recent reviews and detailed feature offerings.
Counter stands out as the more reliable and feature-rich PMS, especially given its recent reviews and active user base. Its support, integrations, and comprehensive toolkit make it a strong choice for hotels that prioritize operational efficiency and scalability.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable, and well-supported platform with robust features, Counter is your best bet. Its focus on hostels and small hotels with an active community ensures ongoing improvements and reliable performance.
On the other hand, my-bookings lacks recent user feedback and a visible feature set, which significantly diminishes confidence in its current capabilities. Without transparent pricing, recent reviews, or integrations, it’s difficult to recommend as a primary PMS.
In conclusion, Counter’s proven track record and active community make it the clear option for hotels seeking a dependable, full-featured management system. my-bookings may eventually develop into a viable alternative, but at present, Counter’s recent performance and comprehensive offerings make it the safer, smarter choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
my-bookings |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 my-bookings 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
my-bookings |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 my-bookings 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 my-bookings 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。my-bookings:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,my-bookings 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问