The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
NEC |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
NEC |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
NEC |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Counter by Counter and Nehops by NEC both aim to serve hoteliers but address different needs and markets. Counter is a feature-rich PMS designed specifically for hostels, boasting high user ratings and a broad feature set, whereas NEC’s Nehops emphasizes AI-driven revenue management but lacks broader hotel-specific features and user feedback. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?
Counter by Counter is a cloud-based PMS tailored for hostels and small properties, praised for its ease of use, extensive features, and high customer satisfaction. It has a detailed feature set that includes channel management, booking engine, POS, guest CRM, and automated night audits, making it a versatile choice for hostels seeking a comprehensive operational tool. Conversely, Nehops by NEC focuses mainly on revenue management with AI-driven insights but offers limited hotel-specific functionalities and no user reviews or ratings, making it harder to gauge its real-world performance.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews and a stellar 4.73/5 overall rating, along with a 91% likelihood to recommend, provide strong evidence of its reliability. In contrast, NEC has no reviews or ratings available, leaving hoteliers without concrete feedback on its usability or effectiveness. So, if recent customer feedback and proven performance matter most, Counter clearly has the edge.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, all-in-one PMS with channel management, booking, payments, and guest management, go with Counter. Its features are designed for small and medium properties, especially hostels, with proven high satisfaction among users. If your focus is on AI-powered revenue insights and pricing optimization, and you are comfortable with a product lacking direct user feedback, Nehops might appeal, but the absence of reviews makes its suitability uncertain.
Counter’s large user base, especially in hostels (83%), and proven high ratings make it the safer selection for operational management. Meanwhile, if your hotel is large, complex, or heavily reliant on dynamic revenue strategies, and you’re willing to risk less proven technology, exploring Nehops could be justified, though current data does not support a confident choice.
Counter by Counter earns a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating based on its intuitive interface, mobile friendliness, and simple navigation. Its onboarding process is rated 4.7/5, and users consistently comment on how quickly staff can learn and adopt the system, often praising the clean, straightforward design. Customer support is rated nearly perfect at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting fast response times and helpful staff like Evelyn and Max.
Nehops by NEC offers no user ratings or reviews, leaving its usability largely unverified. Without actual user feedback, it’s impossible to compare its UI/UX or onboarding experience directly. Based solely on available data, Edge: Counter.
Counter by Counter provides 19 unique features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeper module, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—features essential for day-to-day operations of small to medium properties. Nehops, by contrast, offers no feature list, making it impossible to compare feature breadth or depth directly.
Counter’s rich feature set, especially its channel management integrations (with partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki), makes it a versatile tool for hotel operations. Nehops’ focus on AI-driven revenue recommendations means it lacks the operational tools needed for daily management. Edge: Counter.
Counter by Counter is praised for its support, with a 4.96/5 rating and reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from support staff. Users mention support staff like Evelyn and Max by name, emphasizing their professionalism and responsiveness. Some feedback notes slower support in certain time zones but overall positive experiences.
Nehops offers no reviews, ratings, or detailed support information, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. Given the transparent feedback for Counter, Edge: Counter.
Counter by Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment processors, and booking platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki. These integrations facilitate smooth operations and revenue streams, especially for small properties managing multiple online channels.
Nehops has no verified integrations listed, which limits its ability to connect with other essential tools. Without integration options, the platform’s flexibility is constrained. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s high rating of 4.73/5, based on 54 reviews, with many recent, positive comments, demonstrates strong user satisfaction. Hoteliers particularly appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature set, especially in the hostel segment.
Nehops has no reviews or ratings, so it cannot be rated by hoteliers. Its lack of feedback makes it difficult to determine user satisfaction or suitability. Clearly, Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list its pricing, but based on its feature set and customer feedback, it’s likely a paid platform with no free tier. Nehops also does not list prices or subscription models, leaving potential users uncertain about costs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, it’s best to contact vendors directly for quotes. However, the proven value and extensive features of Counter suggest a paid model justified by its multiple integrations and support.
Counter by Counter is a highly-rated, feature-rich PMS designed for hostels and small properties, with extensive integrations and strong customer support. Its proven track record and recent reviews make it the safer and more reliable choice for operational needs.
If your hotel prioritizes comprehensive management tools, ease of use, and a well-supported platform, Counter is the clear winner. Its extensive features and high customer satisfaction make it ideal for small to medium properties seeking an all-in-one solution.
Nehops by NEC appeals mainly to properties focused on revenue optimization through AI insights, but the lack of reviews, features, and real-world feedback makes it an uncertain choice. If your hotel is large, complex, or needs operational tools, Nehops isn’t the right pick.
In summary, for most hoteliers evaluating PMS options today, Counter by Counter offers a proven, well-supported platform with high user ratings, broad features, and strong regional presence. Nehops remains an interesting but unproven alternative for highly specialized revenue management, best suited for properties willing to experiment.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Nehops 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Nehops 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Nehops:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,NEC 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问