The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Occupancy Plus 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Occupancy Plus 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) hinges on your hotel's specific needs, budget, and growth plans. Counter by Counter and Occupancy Plus by Occupancy Plus aim to streamline operations, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. Counter, with its recent reviews and extensive feature set, offers a more proven solution for hostel operators and small hotels. Occupancy Plus, despite its broader scope, lacks recent user feedback and regional presence, affecting its reliability. Are you ready to prioritize proven performance or explore emerging options?
Counter by Counter stands out as the more dependable choice, thanks to its 54 recent reviews, a high overall rating of 4.73/5, and a dedicated user base across six continents. Its comprehensive feature list and positive support feedback make it a safer and more effective option. Occupancy Plus, with no recent reviews and no measurable market presence, remains unverified and less suitable for hotels seeking proven solutions. For immediate, reliable results, Counter is the clear winner.
Counter is designed specifically for hostels and small hotels, offering an all-in-one platform that simplifies daily operations. Its intuitive interface and mobile accessibility have been praised by users, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating and 91% likelihood to recommend based on recent reviews. Conversely, Occupancy Plus has no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability or effectiveness.
Counter’s strengths lie in its extensive feature set—channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and automated night audits—tailored to hospitality needs. Occupancy Plus’s capabilities are not clearly documented or demonstrated through recent user feedback, raising questions about its practical value or ease of adoption for your team. Given the absence of recent data, Counter’s proven track record makes it the more reliable choice for your hotel.
Edge: Counter.
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small boutique property seeking a straightforward, feature-rich PMS, Counter is the ideal solution. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and excellent ratings across usability and support make it suitable for teams that need quick onboarding and easy daily management.
If your hotel requires a more advanced, possibly AI-driven system with broader analytics, occupancy insights, or enterprise features, Occupancy Plus might appeal—though, with no recent reviews or regional presence, its actual capabilities remain unverified. For most hoteliers, especially those valuing proven support and recent user experience, Counter is the clear choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s UI is praised for its simplicity, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, and is designed for staff at all levels to learn quickly. Users highlight its mobile-friendly design, making management tasks possible from anywhere, and report minimal onboarding challenges. Support responsiveness is high, with reviews mentioning quick, helpful assistance from the Counter team.
In contrast, Occupancy Plus has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its ease of use or onboarding experience. Its lack of recent feedback suggests lower confidence in its usability or support quality.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 exclusive features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency handling, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features address core operational needs and are well-supported by recent user reviews.
Occupancy Plus’s feature set remains unclear, with no documented or reviewed functionalities available today. While it may have comparable capabilities, the absence of recent user feedback or detailed specifications means you cannot confidently assess its feature depth or reliability.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers note that team members like Evelyn and Max are "always helpful" and "reply within minutes," though some mention support can be slower in certain time zones.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Occupancy Plus, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality or responsiveness. Without recent user feedback, the confidence level in its customer service remains very low.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki, providing robust options for channel management, payment processing, and access control. These integrations support seamless operations and revenue management, with users praising the platform's connectivity.
Occupancy Plus has no verified integrations listed and no recent reviews mentioning third-party connections, which raises concerns about its compatibility and extensibility. For a hotel looking to connect various platforms smoothly, Counter’s integrations are a key advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter enjoys an overall rating of 4.73/5, based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support, and feature set. Its users, mainly hostels and small hotels, rate it highly, with a 91% likelihood to recommend.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Occupancy Plus, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. The lack of recent data diminishes confidence in its performance or suitability.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing or subscription models. However, Counter is a paid platform without a free tier or trial, suggesting a straightforward purchase or subscription fee. Occupancy Plus also lacks transparent pricing details, making direct comparison impossible.
Given the absence of clear pricing data, your decision should focus on features, support, and proven performance rather than cost alone.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly customized revenue management, extensive multi-property support, or advanced enterprise features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven support, recent user feedback, or extensive integrations, as Occupancy Plus has not demonstrated these qualities recently.
Counter by Counter offers a well-rounded, proven PMS solution with a recent, extensive review base and a high satisfaction rate. Its feature set, ease of use, and support make it suitable for small hotels, hostels, and boutique properties looking for immediate operational improvements.
Occupancy Plus, despite its promising scope, suffers from a lack of recent validation, making it a less reliable choice for hotels that need assurance and proven results. Until it demonstrates updated performance and user feedback, Counter remains the stronger, safer investment.
For hoteliers seeking a trusted, feature-rich PMS with support and recent positive reviews, Counter is the clear recommendation. If your property has unique needs for AI-driven insights and can verify Occupancy Plus’s capabilities, it might be worth exploring further—but caution is advised.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Occupancy Plus 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Occupancy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Occupancy Plus 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Occupancy Plus 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Occupancy Plus:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Occupancy Plus 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问