The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 115 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 自动化功能, 平台集成,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进, 直接 ota 连接。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
|
+
价格
▾
|
+
认证过程
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #14 54 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and OpenHotel PMS by OpenHotel hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both products aim to streamline property management and reservation handling but diverge in features, user experience, and regional presence. Counter is tailored for hostels with a focus on simplicity and mobile use, while OpenHotel offers a broader, integrated solution suited for various hotel types. Which solution aligns more closely with your hotel’s scale and complexity?
Counter provides a free, straightforward PMS optimized for hostels, emphasizing ease of use and automation. Conversely, OpenHotel is an award-winning, comprehensive platform that combines PMS, yield management, and booking engines into one package. Are you seeking a simple tool or an all-in-one platform?
Counter is designed specifically for hostels, offering an easy-to-navigate interface that reduces onboarding time and operational complexity. On the other hand, OpenHotel caters to a wider range of property types, including resorts, motels, and budget hotels, providing a more extensive feature set suitable for larger or multi-property operations. Given the recent review count advantage and higher overall rating, OpenHotel’s current data suggests it is a more robust choice for many hoteliers.
Counter’s core strength lies in its simplified, mobile-friendly interface and automation features like POS integration and guest CRM, which help hostel operators manage check-ins and reservations efficiently. OpenHotel’s strength is in its integrated yield management and group booking tools, which are more beneficial for hotels with larger inventories and revenue goals. Which of these strengths aligns better with your operational priorities?
Counter’s UI is praised for its simplicity, with a review score of 4.6/5 for ease of use and positive comments about its intuitive design. Multiple users highlight how quickly staff can learn and adapt to the system, especially with its mobile browser compatibility, facilitating remote management. However, some bugs related to overbookings and bed availability have been noted, which can hinder daily operations.
OpenHotel scores slightly higher for usability at 4.71/5, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly layout and straightforward navigation. Users appreciate that it is easy for staff to pick up, even if they are new to property management software. Despite a slightly more modern aesthetic, some critiques point to authentication processes that can be repetitive. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers two features unique to its platform: a mobile app and guest CRM, both focused on guest engagement and operational flexibility in hostel settings. In contrast, OpenHotel provides six exclusive features, including a revenue management module, native email marketing, integrated payment terminals, digital registration, and an EPoS system—tailored for broader property types and revenue optimization.
Both systems share 17 features, such as booking management, channel connectivity, and reporting tools. However, OpenHotel’s specialty in yield management and direct OTA integration positions it as a more complete solution for hotels looking to maximize revenue. Edge: OpenHotel.
Counter’s customer support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers highlighting responsiveness and professionalism, notably mentioning team members Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the quick responses to bugs and system issues, although some report slower support depending on time zones.
OpenHotel’s support rating is slightly lower at 4.82/5, with reviews emphasizing personal, service-oriented assistance. Users commend the team for ongoing updates and responsiveness during emergencies, but some find authentication processes cumbersome. Edge: Counter.
Counter has a total of 7 verified partners, including popular options like Stripe for payments and Cloudbeds for channel management. Shared integrations include SiteMinder, but Counter lacks some regional channel options, which might limit outreach for certain markets.
OpenHotel boasts 12 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and additional partners like RateGain, OpenKey, and Canary Technologies. Its broader integration ecosystem supports more extensive property and revenue management workflows, especially for larger hotels or chains. Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel maintains a slightly higher overall rating of 4.81/5 compared to Counter’s 4.73/5, with recent reviews favoring OpenHotel’s user experience and support. Hotel segments like resorts and branded hotels tend to rate OpenHotel higher, reflecting its suitability for larger operations.
Counter is predominantly used by hostels, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 reviews, indicating strong satisfaction within its niche. Larger hotels or those seeking broader features tend to prefer OpenHotel, with recent reviews emphasizing its effectiveness in revenue management and multi-property operations. Which segment best describes your property?
Both Counter and OpenHotel do not publicly disclose detailed pricing models, but neither offers a freemium plan or monthly per-room charges. Counter’s free model indicates a likely tiered or customized approach, while OpenHotel’s pricing is typically based on property size and feature suite. Expect to contact sales for precise quotes.
Counter is best suited for small, hostel-style properties that want a simple, cost-effective solution with mobile access.
OpenHotel is ideal for mid-sized to large hotels or chains aiming for comprehensive control and revenue optimization.
Counter excels as a free, user-friendly PMS tailored for hostels, emphasizing automation and mobility. Its recent review count and support ratings confirm its reliability for small-scale accommodations. However, it falls short on advanced features like yield management and extensive integrations.
OpenHotel offers a broader, more feature-rich platform with a strong focus on revenue management, direct OTA integrations, and scalability. Its higher overall ratings and recent review volume demonstrate its appeal to hotels seeking an integrated, all-in-one solution. It is better suited for properties with more complex needs or larger operations.
If your hotel’s primary goal is simplicity, affordability, and ease of use, Counter is an excellent choice. But if you need advanced revenue tools, extensive integrations, and a scalable platform, OpenHotel is the more appropriate option. Your decision should be driven by your property’s size, growth plans, and operational complexity.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问