The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Opera |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Opera |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Opera |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Opera by Opera hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans. Counter is a specialized PMS built for hostels, boasting a suite of features tailored to small to mid-sized hostels, with a strong focus on ease of use and automation. Opera, however, remains a broad, enterprise-level PMS designed to support hotels of all sizes with extensive management tools, though its current review footprint is nonexistent. Which platform will serve your property best?
Counter leads with a solid user base, detailed recent reviews, and a clear focus on hostel operations. Opera’s lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it difficult to assess its current performance, but its reputation as a comprehensive hotel management system remains well established. Given the available data, does Counter’s targeted approach fit your needs better?
Counter is explicitly designed for hostels, providing a simple and intuitive interface that simplifies daily management tasks. Its mobile-friendly platform enables on-the-go adjustments, which many users praise for boosting operational efficiency. Opera is a comprehensive system suited for larger hotels and chains, offering broad functionality but with little recent user feedback to confirm its current usability or satisfaction levels.
Counter’s recent review count (54 reviews in the last six months) and high ratings (4.73/5 overall, 4.6/5 ease of use, and 4.96/5 customer support) affirm its active, satisfied user base. Opera’s zero recent reviews mean it’s difficult to gauge current hotel operator sentiment. Would your property benefit from Counter’s specialized, user-friendly approach or require the extensive features of Opera?
If your hotel operates as a hostel or similar budget accommodation, Counter’s targeted feature set—channel management, online booking, POS, and housekeepings modules—makes it an ideal fit. Its many integrations (seven verified partners) and focus on multi-currency, multi-lingual support cater well to small, international hostels. Conversely, if your hotel is a larger chain or luxury property with more complex operational needs, Opera’s broad scope, including reservations, front desk, and guest preferences, may be more suitable, though its current lack of user reviews limits confidence.
Counter’s strengths lie in ease of use, rapid onboarding (4.7/5), and automation features that reduce manual work. Opera’s strengths are its ability to handle complex reservations and department management, but without recent reviews, its effectiveness remains uncertain. For your property type, which set of features aligns best with your priorities?
Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating (4.6/5), with many users commenting on its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Support staff are frequently praised, with a 4.96/5 customer support rating, and onboarding is rated 4.7/5, making staff adoption smooth. Users highlight that the platform loads seamlessly on mobile devices, enabling management from anywhere.
Opera’s interface and usability ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews exist to gauge its current user experience. This lack of recent feedback suggests uncertainty about its ease of adoption or daily use. Based on available data, which system’s ease of use would enable your team to operate with confidence?
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, integrated payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, custom rates, revenue reports, and a housekeepings module—all tailored for small hostels. It also supports guest CRM, multi-currency, and multi-lingual capabilities, essential for international markets. Opera, lacking recent reviews and feature details, does not publicly showcase its specific functionality, making detailed comparison impossible.
Counter’s dedicated features for group bookings and automated night audits provide operational efficiencies. Its integrations with platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder enhance connectivity. Without comparable data for Opera, Counter’s feature richness and specialization clearly stand out. Which set of features best supports your operational needs?
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team has an impressive 4.96/5 rating, with reviews frequently praising their quick, helpful responses. Staff like Evelyn and Max are specifically mentioned for professionalism and responsiveness. Hoteliers appreciate the 24/7 online support, which minimizes downtime during critical operations.
Opera’s customer support ratings and reviews are not available, leaving a gap in confidence about ongoing assistance. For your staff to confidently troubleshoot issues or implement updates, responsive support is crucial. Which provider’s support quality aligns more closely with your service standards?
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including key players like WuBook (channel manager), Stripe (payment processing), and Cloudbeds. These integrations streamline booking, payments, and access control, consolidating revenue channels and operational workflows. Opera’s integration count is zero, but as a broad PMS, it likely offers more extensive integrations, though current data is absent.
Counter’s existing integrations directly support core hostel operations, making it a flexible choice for properties looking to connect with popular booking and payment platforms. Would your property benefit more from Counter’s targeted integrations or require the extensive ecosystem Opera might offer?
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in the last six months) average 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood to recommend among users. Hoteliers, especially in hostels, praise Counter’s ease of use, customer support, and automation features. The reviews highlight its suitability for small to mid-sized properties, with many noting swift onboarding and helpful support staff.
Opera’s absence of recent reviews means no current peer feedback is available. Without recent ratings, confidence in its user satisfaction remains low. Based on current data, which product’s reputation aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Counter does not publicly list pricing, but it is a free PMS tailored for hostels, making it highly accessible for small properties. It offers a freemium model with no implementation fees, and no monthly charges per room, making it attractive for budget-conscious hostels.
Opera’s pricing details are similarly undisclosed, with no trial or free tier information available. Enterprise hotel chains often negotiate pricing directly, but transparency is limited. Given Counter’s free model, does your property prioritize cost or comprehensive feature set?
Not ideal if your property requires extensive departmental management or complex revenue optimization tools. Larger hotels needing advanced analytics or a broad ecosystem might find Counter’s scope limiting.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small hostel or boutique property needing a straightforward solution. Given the absence of recent reviews and feature data, smaller properties might find Opera’s complexity unnecessary.
Counter is a specialized, user-friendly PMS built for hostels and small properties, offering a suite of automation and management features at no cost. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings underline its relevance for budget accommodations aiming to streamline operations.
Choose Counter if you prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, and active support, especially if your property operates mainly as a hostel or small hotel. It’s well-suited to properties seeking automation and integrations without sacrificing simplicity.
Opera remains a well-known hotel management platform, but its current review silence raises questions about its recent performance and user satisfaction. It’s likely more suited for large hotels or chains with complex needs that justify its potentially broader feature set.
If your operation demands a simple, efficient PMS with ongoing support, Counter’s the clear choice. Larger, multi-property hotels with complex requirements might consider Opera, but should seek verified recent feedback before proceeding.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Opera 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Opera 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Opera:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Opera 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问