Counter vs. Passepartout: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

Passepartout 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 Passepartout 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 Passepartout 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Passepartout 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter Passepartout
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 Passepartout:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter Passepartout
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter Passepartout
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter Passepartout
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations and guest satisfaction. Counter by Counter is a PMS specifically designed for hostels, boasting a highly positive review profile, whereas Passepartout by Passepartout appears to lack recent review activity and user feedback. Both solutions aim to streamline property management, but the diverging levels of user confidence and feature sets make your decision clearer. Which system aligns better with your operational needs and growth plans?

While Counter has established a strong presence with over 50 recent reviews, Passepartout's limited feedback makes evaluation difficult. If recent, detailed reviews are essential for your decision, Counter offers a more reliable choice. Are you willing to settle for less proven software, or do you prioritize a solution with proven user satisfaction?

Is Counter or Passepartout Better for Hotels?

Counter stands out for its focus on hostels and small properties, offering a suite of features tailored to these needs. Its interface is praised for being intuitive, with a user rating of 4.6/5 and a support rating of 4.96/5, reflecting high usability and customer satisfaction. Passepartout, lacking recent reviews, offers no current data on usability or support, making it difficult to assess its suitability.

Counter's feature set includes a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audits, and a guest CRM, all integrated into its platform. Passepartout's broader description suggests it’s a comprehensive system but lacks explicit feature details or recent user feedback. Which platform provides the practical tools your hotel needs right now?

Counter’s long-standing market presence across multiple regions and its high review scores suggest a mature, stable product. Passepartout’s absence from recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support, feature updates, and regional availability. Do you prefer a proven system with established support and features, or are you open to trying newer, less documented options?

Counter vs Passepartout: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small boutique property, Counter is the clear choice. Its 54 recent reviews and 4.73/5 overall rating demonstrate strong user satisfaction, particularly among hostels, with 83% of users in this segment rating it highly. Passepartout’s lack of recent reviews means it offers no current validation for suitability or performance.

Counter is ideal if you value ease of use, quick onboarding, and a robust feature set that includes channel management, integrated payments, and automation. Passepartout might appeal if you manage a larger portfolio or seek AI-powered tenant insights, but the absence of recent feedback makes this uncertain.

For properties that prioritize reliable support and a proven track record, Counter offers peace of mind. Conversely, if you're exploring innovative features or tailored property management, Passepartout's lack of recent validation makes it a risky choice.

Is Counter or Passepartout Easier to Use?

Counter’s 4.6/5 ease of use rating underscores its user-friendly interface, which is consistently praised for being simple, intuitive, and quick to learn. Users also highlight a smooth onboarding experience, with a 4.7/5 onboarding rating, and positive comments about staff responsiveness.

Passepartout offers no recent review data, so its usability and onboarding quality remain unverified. Without user feedback, you cannot confidently assess how easily your team could adopt it or how supportive its onboarding process might be.

Edge: Counter. Its current high ratings and positive reviews suggest that your staff will adapt quickly and efficiently to its platform.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Passepartout?

Counter provides 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, housekeep­ing module, group functionality, automated night audit, and guest CRM, among others. These features are designed specifically for small properties, especially hostels, and are actively integrated into its platform.

Passepartout, on the other hand, offers no detailed list of features or unique capabilities, making it impossible to compare directly. The absence of verified features suggests it lacks Counter’s breadth of operational tools, or at least that this information is not publicly available or recent.

Edge: Counter. Its comprehensive feature set is clearly documented and tailored to streamline hostel operations.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Passepartout?

Counter’s support team has a stellar reputation, with a 4.96/5 customer support rating and reviews praising their quick, professional, and helpful responses. Review quotes highlight staff like Evelyn and Max for their responsiveness and understanding.

Passepartout offers no recent review data or detailed support information, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without feedback, you cannot verify if its support meets the high standards set by Counter.

Edge: Counter. Its recent, high support ratings and positive user testimonials make it the safer choice for reliable assistance.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Passepartout?

Counter boasts integrations with seven verified partners, including Channel Managers (WuBook, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds), payment providers (Stripe), and other tools like Goki and FLYR. These integrations help streamline operations and expand your distribution channels.

Passepartout has no verified integrations listed and no recent partnerships noted, raising concerns about its ability to connect with other tools in your tech stack.

Edge: Counter. Its verified, diverse integrations make it more adaptable and capable of supporting your existing systems.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Passepartout?

Counter’s recent reviews (54 in the last 6 months) yield an overall rating of 4.73/5, with 91% of users likely to recommend it. Hoteliers in the hostel segment rate it highly at 4.75/5, praising its usability, support, and automation.

Passepartout’s lack of recent reviews means there is no current user rating or recommendation data. This absence diminishes confidence in its current performance and satisfaction levels.

Edge: Counter. Its recent, high ratings and strong recommendation scores make it the preferred choice among users.

How Much Do Counter and Passepartout Cost?

Counter’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but it does not offer a freemium or trial version. Its value proposition appears tied to its extensive feature set and support, suggesting a potentially higher price point.

Passepartout reports no available pricing information, implying it might be custom-quoted or less transparent. The lack of pricing transparency makes comparison difficult.

In summary, both platforms do not openly advertise their costs, but Counter’s established presence suggests a consistent pricing model aligned with features and support.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate primarily as hostels, inns, or small boutique properties, especially those seeking an easy-to-use PMS with automation.
  • Teams that prioritize quick onboarding, mobile management, and robust support.
  • Hotels looking for integrated payment processing, channel management, and guest CRM.
  • Properties that want to automate night audits and manage group bookings efficiently.

Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management or complex multi-property operations, as Counter’s focus is more on operational simplicity.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Passepartout?

  • Larger property portfolios or landlords seeking AI-powered insights and property analytics.
  • Hotels or property managers interested in detailed tenant feedback analytics.
  • Teams looking for a flexible, customizable management system.
  • Properties aiming for a comprehensive, all-in-one property management solution with integrated maintenance and operational tools.

Not ideal if your hotel needs proven, recent support, or integration with multiple third-party platforms, given the current lack of recent reviews and detailed feature validation.

Counter vs Passepartout: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter emerges as the more reliable choice due to its extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven feature set. Its focus on hostels and small properties makes it well-suited for hotels in this segment seeking an all-in-one management platform.

Choose Counter if you prioritize ease of use, support, and proven performance. It offers the operational tools, integrations, and user confidence needed to run your property smoothly.

Passepartout might appeal to larger portfolios or those seeking AI-driven insights, but the current lack of recent feedback and verified features makes it a risky gamble without more validation. Its value remains uncertain until further user data becomes available.

In conclusion, for most hoteliers, especially those in the hostel or small hotel segment, Counter by Counter is the safer, more dependable choice that can support your day-to-day operations and future growth.

Counter 和 Passepartout 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter Passepartout

Counter 有哪些 Passepartout 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Passepartout 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter Passepartout
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 Passepartout:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
Passepartout
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 Passepartout 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 Passepartout?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Passepartout 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Passepartout 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 Passepartout 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。Passepartout:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 Passepartout?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Passepartout 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息