The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Passpartout 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Passpartout 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Passpartout by Passpartout boils down to core functionalities, user satisfaction, and regional presence. Counter, with its extensive review base and recent positive feedback, clearly dominates in terms of hotel-specific features and hotelier trust. Passpartout’s limited reviews and lack of recent user feedback make it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or fit for your property. Do you want a proven, hotel-focused PMS with a strong track record, or are you exploring an untested platform?
Counter aims to serve hostels, boutique hotels, and small to medium properties with an intuitive interface and a broad feature set. Passpartout appears to target a wider property management niche, but its lack of reviews and regional presence raises questions. Which platform aligns better with your operational needs and customer base?
Counter’s strengths lie in its well-rounded hotel management capabilities, boasting 54 reviews with a 4.73 out of 5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, excellent customer support, and useful automation features, especially for hostels. Conversely, Passpartout has zero reviews, no recent feedback, and no discernible hotel-specific features, making it impossible to determine its suitability or effectiveness.
Counter’s review count and recent feedback provide a clear picture of user satisfaction, while Passpartout’s lack of data leaves hoteliers guessing about reliability and feature set. Do you prefer a platform with proven results and ongoing support, or are you willing to gamble on an unverified system?
If your hotel requires a reliable PMS with strong review support, robust booking and channel management, and automation features, Counter is the clear choice. It’s especially suited for hostels and small hotels that need straightforward, mobile-friendly management tools. If your hotel needs a scalable, AI-driven platform with advanced analytics and automation for larger or more complex properties, Passpartout could be appealing—though its lack of reviews and market presence makes it a risky bet.
Counter’s extensive integrations with platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Goki, plus its multiple region coverage, make it more versatile for global operations. Passpartout’s undefined feature set and zero verified partners mean you’re essentially evaluating an unproven product.
Counter’s interface scores a 4.6 out of 5 on ease of use, and reviews consistently praise its simplicity and quick staff onboarding. Hoteliers find onboarding straightforward with a well-designed mobile and desktop experience, making daily management easier. In contrast, Passpartout has no user reviews or ratings, so there is no data to assess its usability or onboarding process.
Based on Counter’s high ratings and positive feedback, your team will likely adopt the system faster, reducing training time and operational disruptions. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, housekeepings modules, guest CRM, multi-currency, and automated night audits. These tools directly address daily hotel operations, allowing for holistic management. Passpartout does not disclose its features, and with no verified integrations or modules, it’s impossible to compare feature depth.
Counter’s feature-rich platform supports operational automation and revenue tracking, giving your team more control. Passpartout’s lack of transparency makes it a gamble—unless you need a very specific, AI-driven solution that isn’t yet proven.
Counter’s customer support scores a 4.96 out of 5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers value the responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Passpartout provides no publicly available support ratings, reviews, or feedback, leaving its support quality unverified.
If support quality influences your decision, Counter’s proven track record and recent reviews suggest you’ll receive prompt assistance. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, and payment platforms like Stripe. These integrations enable streamlined operations across multiple platforms, making it easier to manage bookings, payments, and access control. Passpartout has no listed verified integrations, which could limit its compatibility with your existing infrastructure.
Having more integrations ensures your hotel can connect with the tools you already use, reducing manual work. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s hotelier reviews are recent and plentiful, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews, mostly praising ease of use, support, and automation. Hotels across segments like hostels and boutique hotels rate it highly, with many reviews citing operational efficiency and smooth onboarding. Passpartout, with no reviews, cannot provide any property ratings or feedback, leaving its reputation unverified.
Considering the volume and recency of reviews, hoteliers clearly prefer Counter. Its high rating and positive feedback demonstrate its real-world effectiveness. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not disclose specific pricing but is known to be a paid system with no free tier or trial. Passpartout similarly offers no pricing details, making direct comparison impossible. Both platforms likely require a custom quote based on your property size and needs.
Given Counter’s established pricing model and transparent reviews, you can budget accordingly. Passpartout’s unclear pricing means you’ll need to inquire directly, adding uncertainty to your decision.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on complex revenue management, detailed group booking features, or regional OTA integrations not supported.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven, hotel-specific features, or if you require extensive regional integrations and support.
Counter offers a well-rounded, hotel-focused PMS with a proven track record, high ratings, and strong customer support. Its extensive features, integrations, and regional presence make it suitable for various property types, especially hostels and boutique hotels. Passpartout remains unreviewed, unproven, and lacks critical hotel-specific features, making it a risky choice without further validation.
If you value reliability, user satisfaction, and operational support backed by recent reviews, Counter is the clear winner. Choose Passpartout only if your hotel specifically needs its AI-driven approach and you’re willing to accept the unknowns. For most hoteliers, Counter provides a safer, more effective solution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Passpartout |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Passpartout 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Passpartout 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Passpartout 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Passpartout:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Passpartout 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问