The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Counter by Counter is a cloud-based PMS designed explicitly for hostels, offering an all-in-one workspace with a strong focus on ease of use, automation, and integrations. Persefone by Persefone presents itself as a comprehensive suite that emphasizes technical sophistication and reliability, but it currently lacks the extensive user feedback and recent reviews that bolster Counter’s credibility.
Counter’s extensive review history, with 54 reviews and recent feedback in the last six months, indicates a well-established presence and ongoing support. Persefone, despite over 17 years of experience and more than 3,000 users in Italy, has no recent reviews or visible active user feedback, which raises questions about its current market adoption and customer satisfaction. Do you prefer a proven, actively supported solution, or are you willing to consider a less-tested platform?
Counter is a cloud-based PMS catering primarily to hostels and boutique properties, with features like automated night audits, POS integration, and guest CRM. Persefone claims to offer an all-in-one hotel management suite with a wide array of functionalities, but without recent reviews, it’s difficult to validate its current performance or user satisfaction.
Counter’s strengths lie in its ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating and 91% likelihood to recommend, alongside a high customer support score of 4.96/5. Persefone’s lack of recent feedback makes it hard to assess its usability, customer support, or stability in day-to-day operations. Given Counter’s active community and ongoing improvements, it’s a safer choice for hoteliers seeking reliability and support today. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational needs and support expectations?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small boutique property requiring a straightforward, user-friendly system that simplifies check-in, reservations, and OTA management, Counter is the clear choice. Its feature set includes POS, guest profiles, multi-currency support, and automation, making daily operations smoother for busy hostel teams.
Conversely, if you run a larger hotel chain or resort needing a more robust, integrated management system with advanced monitoring, real-time updates, and automated task assignments, Persefone might appeal—though the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence. For now, Counter’s demonstrated track record and active user base make it the more reliable option. Are you prioritizing ease of use and active support, or are you looking for a more complex, all-in-one solution?
Counter boasts a 4.6/5 ease of use rating based on 54 reviews, with users describing its interface as "clean," "intuitive," and "easy to learn." Many reviewers highlight how quickly staff can be trained, with some noting that the system is “very friendly” and that support is “always there to help,” especially praising team members like Evelyn and Max.
Persefone, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness or onboarding process. Its long history suggests a mature product, but without current feedback, it’s an unknown quantity. Given Counter’s high usability score and recent positive comments, it clearly has the edge in user-friendliness.
Counter offers 19 features, including payment processing, custom rates, direct billing, group functionality, automated night audits, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking—all tailored to the needs of hostel operators. Persefone provides 7 shared features with Counter, plus 3 unique features like a housekeeping mobile app, real-time status updates, and automated task assignments.
Counter’s broader feature set and continuous updates, backed by recent reviews, make it a more comprehensive choice for properties looking to manage multiple aspects of their operations within a single platform. Persefone’s features seem more focused on larger, integrated hotel environments, but without recent validation, Counter’s feature depth takes the lead. Would your hotel benefit more from specialized automation or a wider array of management tools?
Counter’s customer support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising its quick, helpful, and professional assistance. Clients often mention team members like Evelyn and Max as “responsive,” “patient,” and “efficient,” which is critical for busy hotel teams.
Persefone, despite its long presence in Italy, has no recent reviews or publicly available feedback on support. This absence raises concerns about ongoing support quality and responsiveness. For now, Counter’s consistently high support ratings and active user feedback make it the safer, more dependable choice.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including popular channel managers like SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, along with Stripe for payments and Goki for access control. This extensive integration ecosystem simplifies operations and expands market reach for your hotel.
Persefone currently has no verified integrations listed, which may limit its connectivity with other systems. While Persefone might support custom integrations, the lack of verified partners reduces its immediacy for property owners seeking seamless connectivity. Counter’s established integration network gives it a clear advantage. Which platform will keep your business connected and flexible?
Counter’s reviews, with a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 reviews, show strong user satisfaction, especially among hostels and independent properties. The recent reviews confirm its reliability, ease of use, and excellent support, with 91% of users willing to recommend it.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction today. Despite its long history, the lack of current feedback makes Counter the evidently preferred choice among active users. Would you rather rely on a platform with proven recent performance?
Counter does not list a fixed price or a free tier, and it appears to operate on a custom quote basis, often based on property size or needs. Persefone charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no free trial or tiered pricing details available.
Given Counter’s flexible, tailored pricing model and no upfront implementation fees, it may be more adaptable for small to mid-sized properties. Persefone’s fixed cost might appeal to larger properties with stable budgets but offers less transparency. Which pricing structure fits your hotel’s financial planning?
Not ideal if you need advanced reporting, dynamic pricing, or extensive customization for complex hotel operations. Counter is perfect for properties that prioritize simplicity and support over elaborate feature sets.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs a user-friendly system, or prefers active support and recent reviews. Persefone’s strengths lie in comprehensive management, but its current market presence appears limited.
Counter by Counter offers a proven, active, and highly-rated PMS tailored for hostels and boutique hotels. Its feature set, ease of use, and support infrastructure are backed by recent reviews, making it a robust solution for properties seeking simplicity and reliability.
Persefone, with its long history and broad feature list, may suit larger hotels or resorts looking for an integrated, all-in-one platform. However, the absence of recent reviews and active user feedback makes it a less certain choice today.
If your priority is a well-supported, easy-to-use system with recent validation, Counter is the clear pick. For properties with complex, large-scale needs and a preference for a longstanding provider, Persefone could still hold appeal, but caution is advised. Ultimately, select a platform that aligns with your operational size, support expectations, and growth plans.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Persefone 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Persefone 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Persefone:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Persefone 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问