The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Counter by Counter and Portfolio HMS by Megasys aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in terms of user base, features, and market presence. Counter is a newer system designed specifically for hostels, with a strong focus on ease of use, automation, and integration, while Megasys offers a broader hotel management package with extensive capabilities but lacks recent review data. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Counter’s more established presence, with 54 recent reviews and a high overall rating, makes it a more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven user satisfaction. Megasys, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides little current feedback, raising questions about ongoing support and feature relevance. Are you prioritizing a system with proven performance and active customer feedback?
Counter and Megasys serve different hotel segments, though Counter’s focus on hostels makes it more specialized. Counter simplifies operations with an intuitive interface, automation, and mobile management, which is ideal if your team values ease of use and quick onboarding. Megasys offers a comprehensive hotel management suite, including reservation, front desk, and guest communication tools, but without recent reviews, clarity on its usability is limited.
Counter’s recent reviews praise its straightforward setup, fast customer support, and automation features that reduce manual tasks. In contrast, Megasys’ lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess its current performance, support quality, or feature updates. Your decision hinges on whether your property benefits more from Counter’s specialized hostel focus or Megasys’ broader management capabilities.
Are you seeking a dedicated hostel PMS with proven support, or a comprehensive hotel management system that may require more setup and training?
If your property is primarily a hostel, budget boutique, or small hotel needing an easy-to-use, cloud-based PMS, Counter is the clear choice. Its 54 recent reviews, 4.73/5 overall rating, and 91% likelihood to recommend underscore its current relevance and customer satisfaction.
If your hotel requires a more complex management solution with extensive reporting, personalized guest service, and deeper integration, Megasys might seem appealing, but the absence of recent reviews diminishes confidence. For hoteliers prioritizing simplicity, affordability, and active support, Counter clearly outperforms Megasys at this time.
In summary, choose Counter for hostels and smaller properties that value ease of use, automation, and support. Consider Megasys only if you need a broad management system and can evaluate its current capabilities independently.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its simple, intuitive interface, and quick staff onboarding process. Users report that the platform is friendly for staff and easy to learn, with a clean mobile and desktop experience that supports remote management.
In contrast, Megasys has no recent ratings or reviews available, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness. The historical complexity of comprehensive hotel management software suggests it may require more extensive training and onboarding, which could slow staff adoption.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, guest CRM, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, and automated night audit. These features are tailored toward simplifying hostel operations and enhancing automation, with a focus on online booking and revenue tracking.
Megasys offers no specific features listed in the available data, making it difficult to compare directly. Given Counter’s extensive feature set, especially tailored for hostels, it clearly provides more immediate operational tools for your team.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team receives an impressive 4.96/5 rating, with reviewers praising their quick responsiveness, professionalism, and helpfulness—particularly mentioning staff like Evelyn and Max. Customers say support is “always reachable” and “responds within minutes,” which is vital for daily hotel operations.
There are no recent reviews or support ratings for Megasys, leaving a gap in confidence regarding their customer service. Without recent feedback, it's safer to assume that Counter’s top-rated support is a significant advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, and Goki, facilitating channel management, payment, and access control. These integrations enable smooth workflows and income consolidation for your property.
Megasys does not currently list any verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools and platforms. For operational flexibility and streamlining, Counter’s integrations are a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews reflect a high satisfaction level, with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 reviews and a 91% recommendation rate. Users, mostly hostels, praise its ease of use, support, and automation.
Megasys lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Given the data, Counter is the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking proven user satisfaction.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not specify a pricing model or fee structure, but its free and easy-to-use nature suggests affordability for small properties. Megasys also does not list specific prices, but as a broader hotel management system, it may involve higher costs or complex pricing models.
Without concrete pricing details, your best approach is to contact vendors directly for quotes, especially if budget considerations are critical.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter excels as a dedicated, user-friendly PMS designed for hostels and small hotels, with a robust feature set and proven support, supported by recent reviews and high ratings. Megasys offers a broader management system but lacks recent feedback, making it uncertain whether it currently meets modern hotel needs.
Choose Counter if you prioritize ease of use, automation, active support, and proven performance in the hostel segment. Opt for Megasys only if your hotel requires extensive management capabilities and you can verify its current feature set and support levels through direct engagement.
In conclusion, Counter stands out as the more reliable and tested solution for your hotel, especially if operational simplicity and support are top priorities.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Portfolio HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Portfolio HMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Portfolio HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Megasys 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问