The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Your hotel faces a choice between Counter by Counter and Previo by PREVIO, two property management systems designed to streamline operations. Both aim to improve efficiency, but they cater to different hotel types and operational needs. Counter, with its focus on hostels, boasts a strong user base and recent, positive reviews, while Previo offers a broader suite of features targeting hotels in the CEE region. How do these differences influence your decision?
Counter simplifies hostel management with an intuitive, mobile-friendly interface, while Previo provides a wider array of tools like guest apps and online booking. The key question: which system aligns better with your hotel’s size, segment, and operational complexity?
Counter is a free, easy-to-use PMS primarily for hostels, with a focus on simplicity and automation. It’s highly rated for ease of use (4.6/5), customer support (4.96/5), and overall satisfaction (4.73/5), backed by 54 recent reviews. Conversely, Previo offers more features, including a built-in booking engine, guest app, and channel management, but lacks recent review data and a high rating score.
Counter’s user reviews praise its straightforward interface and automation, yet note bugs like overbooking issues. Previo’s lack of recent reviews makes it harder to gauge current usability or support quality. Do you need a simple hostel-focused solution or a comprehensive hotel system with more features?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing an affordable, easy-to-manage system, Counter is the clear choice. Its top-rated ease of use, strong support, and focused features like automated night audit and POS integration suit hostels with limited operational complexity.
However, if your hotel requires a more extensive set of tools—such as online check-in, guest communication, and integrated payment terminals—Previo might be better, especially if you operate in the CEE region. Its broader features support larger, multi-service hotels striving for centralized management. For hostels or small hotels prioritizing simplicity, choose Counter; for hotels seeking feature depth, lean toward Previo.
Counter’s user interface earns a 4.6/5 rating, with reviews highlighting its clean, intuitive design and seamless mobile access. Its onboarding process is rated 4.7/5, and users report quick staff adoption thanks to its straightforward workflow. Support responsiveness is highly praised, with many mentioning fast, accessible help from team members like Evelyn and Max.
In contrast, Previo’s user experience details are not available, which suggests it may be more complex but potentially less user-friendly for small teams. Based on current data, Edge: Counter.
Counter excels in core hostel needs, offering 7 unique features such as automated night audit, POS system integration, and guest CRM, totaling 12 shared features with Previo. Its specialized features support hostel operations like cashless payments and automated check-ins, catering to simplicity and automation.
Previo provides more features overall—19 exclusive ones including online check-in, gift vouchers, integrated ID scanner, and rate management—making it suited for hotels with complex operations. Its extensive toolset is advantageous for larger, service-oriented hotels.
Edge: Previo for feature breadth; Counter for targeted hostel management.
Counter’s support ratings are exceptional at 4.96/5, with reviews mentioning fast replies and professional assistance, especially from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the quick problem resolution and ongoing system improvements, although support in certain time zones may be slower.
Previo’s support ratings are unavailable, which indicates less recent feedback or lower visibility in reviews. Given Counter’s recent, positive reviews and high ratings, Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, but lacks regional channel options. Its integrations facilitate streamlined payments and channel management, especially beneficial for hostels seeking multi-platform connectivity.
Previo also connects with 7 verified partners, such as HQ revenue and Profitroom, but offers more integrations specific to the CEE region, including ID scanners and rate management tools. Its focus on regional integrations makes it suitable if your hotel operates primarily in that market.
Edge: Counter, due to broader global platform integrations.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in the last six months) reveal a 4.73/5 overall rating, with a likelihood to recommend of 91%. Its users, primarily hostels, praise its ease of use, support, and automation. Larger properties or those seeking a simple, reliable PMS find Counter highly satisfactory.
Previo’s review data is scarce; no recent ratings or detailed feedback are available. Without recent user insights, we must rely on Counter’s proven track record. Therefore, Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publish explicit pricing but is known for its free, no-strings-attached model targeting hostels. This makes it an attractive option for small properties wanting to minimize costs.
Previo’s pricing details are also not publicly available, but as an all-in-one system with extensive features, it likely involves a subscription fee or customized quote, especially in the CEE region. For budget-conscious hostels, Counter’s free model offers significant value; for larger hotels, pricing may be more aligned with feature value.
Counter provides a streamlined, highly-rated PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, emphasizing simplicity and automation. Its recent reviews show a dedicated user base that values ease of use, support, and core features like POS and night audits. It’s ideal for properties that want to keep operations straightforward without sacrificing functionality.
Previo, while less reviewed recently, offers a comprehensive suite that suits medium to larger hotels in the CEE region seeking to consolidate multiple management functions. Its extensive features support complex operations but may be overwhelming or unnecessary for small properties.
Choosing between them depends on your hotel’s size, location, and operational needs. If you need a reliable, user-friendly solution for a small or hostel property, Counter is the better choice. For hotels in the CEE region requiring a full-service platform, Previo could be more suitable, despite limited recent reviews.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Previo 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Previo 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Previo:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,PREVIO 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问