Counter vs. PT. Supranusa Sindata: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

PT. Supranusa Sindata 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 PT. Supranusa Sindata 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 PT. Supranusa Sindata 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 PT. Supranusa Sindata 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter PT. Supranusa Sindata PT. Supranusa Sindata
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 PT. Supranusa Sindata:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter PT. Supranusa Sindata PT. Supranusa Sindata
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter PT. Supranusa Sindata PT. Supranusa Sindata
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter PT. Supranusa Sindata PT. Supranusa Sindata
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and PT. Supranusa Sindata hinges on your property’s size, operational focus, and regional needs. Both aim to streamline your property management, but Counter delivers a more modern, hostels-centric experience suited for contemporary small-scale operations, whereas PT. Supranusa Sindata offers a broader suite grounded in extensive experience with larger, diverse hotels.

Counter excels with its highly-rated user interface and recent reviews, indicating an active and satisfied customer base. PT. Supranusa Sindata, meanwhile, lacks recent reviews, making it harder to gauge current performance and customer satisfaction.

Are you seeking a user-friendly, quick-to-implement PMS for a hostel or small hotel? Or do you need a long-established, multi-property solution with extensive support in Asia? Your choice depends on your specific operational priorities.

Is Counter or PT. Supranusa Sindata Better for Hotels?

Counter primarily targets hostels and small properties with its all-in-one system designed for ease, automation, and mobility. Its 54 reviews, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and recent feedback, reinforce its reputation for simplicity and responsiveness.

PT. Supranusa Sindata has a long history (since 1990) with over two decades in the industry, but it has no recent reviews available. This absence makes it difficult to judge current customer satisfaction or product upgrades, especially compared to Counter’s active user base.

Counter’s recent reviews highlight a straightforward interface, quick onboarding, and automation features that reduce manual work. Conversely, PT. Supranusa Sindata’s older reputation suggests stability but offers little recent insight into its current usability or support quality. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth stage and regional focus?

Is Counter or PT. Supranusa Sindata Easier to Use?

Counter scores impressively on ease of use with 4.6/5 ratings, recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, and a quick onboarding process averaging 4.7/5. Users cite its mobile-friendly design and straightforward navigation as key benefits, with staff able to learn and adopt it rapidly.

PT. Supranusa Sindata, lacking recent reviews, provides no current data on usability or onboarding experiences. Its long-standing presence hints at familiarity and stability but does not reflect the latest interface improvements or user feedback.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or PT. Supranusa Sindata?

Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, integrated payment processing, booking engine, guest CRM, group functionality, automated night audit, and multi-currency support. Its features are built for small, dynamic properties needing automation and flexibility.

PT. Supranusa Sindata’s feature set isn’t detailed here, with no unique features listed or recent updates. Its focus appears broader, covering multi-property management, POS, and industry-specific solutions, but without recent differentiation.

Counter’s feature-rich platform, focused on hostel operations, provides specific tools for guest management, automation, and revenue tracking that are highly rated by users. PT. Supranusa Sindata’s broader suite is suitable for larger, more complex operations but less tailored to small-scale hostel needs.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or PT. Supranusa Sindata?

Counter’s support has an outstanding 4.96/5 rating, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and dedicated staff like Evelyn and Max. Users value the responsiveness, even during system bugs or minor issues.

PT. Supranusa Sindata’s support quality cannot be assessed here, as there are no recent reviews or ratings provided. Its long history suggests established support processes, but current customer satisfaction remains unverified.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or PT. Supranusa Sindata?

Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki, supporting various connectivity needs. Its integrations streamline online distribution, payments, and access control, critical for small properties and hostels.

PT. Supranusa Sindata also connects with 7 verified partners, including RateGain, Revinate, and IDeaS, but its integrations lean toward larger, enterprise solutions. Its regional focus may limit availability of some global OTA integrations.

Counter’s integrations are well-suited for small properties seeking flexibility and extensive connectivity options. PT. Supranusa Sindata’s integrations serve larger, regional needs but lack recent reviews confirming their robustness.

Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or PT. Supranusa Sindata?

Counter boasts a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback praising its simplicity, automation, and customer support. Its active review base shows ongoing user engagement and satisfaction.

PT. Supranusa Sindata has no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current hoteliers’ opinion. Its reputation is rooted in long-term industry presence, but without latest feedback, its current ratings are unknown.

For hoteliers prioritizing recent user experiences, Counter’s high ratings definitively favor it.

Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and PT. Supranusa Sindata Cost?

Counter does not specify a price, but it is available as a free PMS, making it highly accessible for small hostels and boutique hotels. Additional costs may come from integrations or optional features.

PT. Supranusa Sindata’s pricing is also not detailed here, but as a long-established provider, it likely offers tailored quotes based on property size and feature needs, potentially making it less affordable for small properties.

For budget-conscious small properties, Counter’s free model makes it a clear choice. Larger, multi-property hotels might find PT. Supranusa Sindata’s pricing more suited to their complex needs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate primarily in the hostel or small boutique segment, requiring easy management and automation.
  • Teams prioritizing quick onboarding, mobile management, and cost-effective solutions.
  • Properties needing integrated POS, group booking, and multi-currency support.
  • Hotels seeking a system with robust customer support and frequent updates.

Not ideal if:

  • Your property requires extensive multi-property management across multiple regions.
  • You need advanced revenue management tools or a highly customizable system.
  • Your hotel operates in a highly regulated industry with specific compliance needs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use PT. Supranusa Sindata?

  • Larger hotels or chains that need a fully integrated, multi-property management system.
  • Hotels in regions where PT. Supranusa Sindata has strong support, such as Indonesia and Asia Pacific.
  • Operations requiring comprehensive POS, banquet management, and detailed business intelligence.
  • Hotels looking for a long-term, established provider with broad industry experience.

Not ideal if:

  • Your property is small or mid-sized, focusing on hostel or boutique operations.
  • You prefer a modern, cloud-based PMS with active user reviews.
  • You require quick deployment or real-time user feedback about the system’s usability.

PT. Supranusa Sindata vs Counter: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter is a modern, user-friendly PMS built specifically for hostels and small properties, with a recent surge in positive reviews and high satisfaction ratings. Its intuitive interface, automation, and dedicated support make it ideal for properties seeking quick, reliable management tools.

PT. Supranusa Sindata offers a broader, seasoned platform targeting larger hotels and multi-property operations, especially in Asia. However, the lack of recent reviews makes current performance and support levels less certain.

If your hotel is a small or boutique property, or if you value recent, positive feedback, Counter is the clear choice. For larger, multi-property operations in regions where PT. Supranusa Sindata is established, its comprehensive offerings may be suitable—but confirm current user satisfaction before proceeding.

Counter 和 PT. Supranusa Sindata 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter PT. Supranusa Sindata PT. Supranusa Sindata

Counter 有哪些 PT. Supranusa Sindata 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 PT. Supranusa Sindata 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter PT. Supranusa Sindata PT. Supranusa Sindata
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 PT. Supranusa Sindata:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
PT. Supranusa Sindata
PT. Supranusa Sindata
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 PT. Supranusa Sindata 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 PT. Supranusa Sindata?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 PT. Supranusa Sindata 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 PT. Supranusa Sindata 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 PT. Supranusa Sindata 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。PT. Supranusa Sindata:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 PT. Supranusa Sindata?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,PT. Supranusa Sindata 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息