The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Resort Data 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Resort Data 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Resort Data hinges on your property’s specific needs. Counter is a streamlined property management system designed primarily for hostels and small accommodations, focusing on ease of use and automation. Resort Data, meanwhile, offers a more customizable system suited for a wide range of property types, including resorts and vacation rentals, with a longer track record and broader service offerings.
Both products aim to simplify daily operations, but they differ considerably in their target markets, feature depth, and support. Is your hotel seeking a simple, user-friendly interface optimized for hostels, or do you need a flexible, scalable platform capable of handling complex property types?
Counter has built a solid reputation with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 recent reviews, and a high likelihood to recommend of 91%. It also boasts a near-perfect customer support rating of 4.96/5, making it the more trusted choice for hoteliers prioritizing ease of use and responsiveness. Resort Data, with zero current reviews and a 0/5 rating, remains untested in recent user feedback, which diminishes confidence in its suitability for your hotel today.
Given the recency and volume of Counter’s user reviews, it is the more reliable choice for hoteliers looking for proven performance, especially in the hostel segment. Resort Data’s lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess its current capabilities or support quality.
Counter excels as a PMS for hostels, inns, and small accommodations that prioritize straightforward operations and automation. Its features include channel management, booking engine, POS integration, automated night audits, and guest CRM, all designed to reduce manual tasks and improve operational efficiency.
Resort Data, however, serves a broader spectrum of property types like resorts, vacation rentals, and timeshare properties, emphasizing custom programming and tailored solutions. Its features are flexible but less detailed in the available data, and its recent market presence appears limited or unverified.
If your hotel needs a simple, reliable PMS optimized for small-scale lodging, Counter is the better fit. But if you operate a resort or complex property with diverse needs requiring tailored programming, Resort Data might appeal—though recent reviews are lacking. Do you prioritize proven, recent user feedback or a highly customizable platform?
If your hotel is a hostel, boutique inn, or small property seeking an easy-to-learn, mobile-friendly system, go with Counter. Its high ease of use (4.6/5), support (4.96/5), and positive reviews—91% likelihood to recommend—indicate strong satisfaction among similar hoteliers.
If you operate a resort, timeshare, or larger property with complex requirements, Resort Data’s longer history and broad service offering might seem advantageous. However, the absence of recent reviews, support ratings, and verified user feedback makes it difficult to recommend it confidently for your hotel today.
In summary, choose Counter for simplicity, quick onboarding, and proven performance. Resort Data may appeal if extensive customization is a must, but you'd be venturing into unverified territory.
Counter’s UI scores 4.6/5, with reviews consistently praising its intuitive and clean interface. Users highlight how quickly staff can learn the system, with many comments about fast onboarding and minimal training needs, especially for hostel environments. The mobile app enhances flexibility, and its cloud-based setup ensures remote management.
Resort Data, with no recent ratings or detailed reviews, offers a platform meant for customization but lacks clear user experience insights today. Without recent feedback, it’s unclear how user-friendly or modern its interface is, particularly for smaller or less tech-savvy teams.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 features exclusive to its platform, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are designed for operational automation, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Resort Data’s feature set is less transparent in the available data, with no specific features listed as exclusive or unique. Its focus appears to be on customization and broad accommodation types, but without detailed feature counts or recent user feedback, it’s difficult to compare directly.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with reviewers frequently praising the responsiveness and professionalism of support staff like Evelyn and Max. Recent reviews mention quick responses, helpful troubleshooting, and ongoing system improvements, especially in the last six months.
Resort Data provides 24-hour support, but without recent reviews or detailed feedback, it’s impossible to gauge current support quality. The lack of recent user sentiment diminishes confidence in its support reliability.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Goki, and Stripe for payments, offering broad connectivity within the industry. Its integrations support automation, online payments, and access control, streamlining multiple operational aspects.
Resort Data lists only 1 verified partner, Whistle, limiting its current connectivity options. The limited integrations suggest less flexibility and fewer options for expanding your property’s tech ecosystem.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews show a strong 4.73/5 overall rating, with 54 reviews in the last six months. Hoteliers, especially in the hostel segment, consistently praise its ease of use, support, and automation features, with 91% recommending it.
Resort Data has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific feedback. Its unverified reputation makes Counter the clear leader in recent customer ratings.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing but appears to operate on a paid model without a freemium option. It is likely a monthly subscription, typical for SaaS PMS providers, with no implementation fees or trial information available.
Resort Data similarly does not specify prices or pricing models, which suggests that larger, customized implementations are typical. Both are likely priced based on property size and requirements, but Counter’s transparent review data indicates a more straightforward value for small properties.
Counter is designed for simplicity and efficiency, making it ideal for small, owner-operated properties.
Resort Data’s flexibility may appeal if your property has unique needs, but recent reviews are lacking, making it a less certain choice.
Counter by Counter is a proven, user-friendly PMS designed primarily for small properties such as hostels and inns. Its high user satisfaction, recent positive reviews, and extensive integration support make it a dependable choice for hoteliers seeking efficiency and ease.
Resort Data offers a flexible, customizable platform suitable for resorts and complex accommodations, but the absence of recent user feedback and support ratings makes it difficult to recommend confidently for your hotel today.
Choose Counter if you want a system that’s easy to implement, well-supported, and backed by recent positive reviews. Resort Data might be suitable if your property demands extensive customization, but you should proceed cautiously given the lack of current user validation.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Resort Data 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Resort Data 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Resort Data 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Resort Data:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Resort Data 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问