The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Rezovation 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Rezovation 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Rezovation by Rezovation boils down to core operational needs. Counter specializes in hostel management, offering an intuitive, mobile-friendly PMS with a focus on automating day-to-day tasks. Rezovation targets small hotels, inns, and B&Bs with an emphasis on online reservations, website integration, and distribution. Both aim to streamline reservations, but their features and reputations differ significantly.
Counter boasts a high rating backed by 54 recent reviews and a 91% likelihood to recommend, making it a more proven choice for active hoteliers. Rezovation, with zero recent reviews and no ratings, lacks the current user feedback necessary to judge its reliability today. Are you comfortable relying on a product with no recent data, or do you prefer a solution with strong, recent validation?
Counter is a dedicated PMS tailored for hostels, with a user-friendly interface rated 4.6/5 and support scoring nearly perfect at 4.96/5. It offers extensive features like channel management, payment processing, and a mobile app, all designed for fast, efficient management of occupancy and guest data. Rezovation, on the other hand, markets itself as a comprehensive management system for small hotels and B&Bs, with a focus on online reservations and marketing. However, its lack of recent reviews leaves its current effectiveness uncertain.
Counter's recent reviews consistently praise its ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive customer support. Rezovation’s absence of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess whether it still meets the needs of modern small hotels. Do you want a product actively supported and improved based on recent user experiences, or are you okay with one that’s been out of the spotlight for some time?
If your hotel is a hostel needing a straightforward, mobile-friendly PMS that simplifies bookings, check-ins, and guest management, Counter is your best option. Its highly-rated interface, automation features, and extensive integrations (including payment and channel management) make it ideal for small, busy hostels seeking operational efficiency.
If your property is a small hotel, inn, or B&B looking primarily for online reservation capabilities, website integration, and GDS connectivity, Rezovation might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or recent validation, you risk choosing a platform that may no longer align with current hospitality technology standards. Given Counter's active, recent user base, it clearly offers more current value.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with users describing its interface as "clean, simple, and easy to understand," and onboarding rated at 4.7/5. Reviews mention that staff can learn the system quickly, and the mobile app allows remote management, making daily operations smoother. Support responsiveness is highly praised, with mentions of staff like Evelyn and Max providing quick assistance.
Rezovation, lacking recent reviews, provides no current data on usability or onboarding. Its complexity or user-friendliness today cannot be verified, leaving hoteliers without confidence in its ease of adoption. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, calendar view, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features cater directly to hostel management, streamlining operations from reservations to guest engagement.
Rezovation’s feature set is not publicly detailed, but it emphasizes online reservations, website design, and internet marketing. Without detailed feature comparison or recent feedback, it’s less clear if Rezovation offers the same operational depth. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Many users describe the support team as understanding, professional, and responsive to issues, even during system bugs.
Rezovation’s support data is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to gauge whether it continues to provide the level of customer service your hotel expects. Relying on a platform without current support ratings poses risks. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major solutions like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki. These integrations facilitate payments, channel management, and access control, creating a connected operational environment.
Rezovation offers no publicly listed integrations or verified partner data, limiting its connectivity options. Without current, verified integrations, Rezovation’s flexibility may be restricted. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s ratings are high across multiple aspects: 4.73/5 overall, 4.6/5 ease of use, and 4.96/5 customer support, from 54 recent reviews. Hoteliers, especially hostels, praise its simplicity, automation, and support responsiveness.
Rezovation, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no current data to compare. Its reputation cannot be gauged today, making Counter the clear choice based on current user feedback. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list pricing but is known for its flexible, scalable model suited for small hostels. Rezovation also lacks explicit pricing details, but historically, it has targeted small properties with bundled solutions, often via custom quotes.
Given the lack of transparency and recent reviews, you should reach out directly for updated quotes. However, Counter’s widespread adoption suggests competitive pricing for its feature set.
Not ideal if your property relies heavily on complex revenue management, advanced reporting, or has specific overbooking concerns.
Not ideal if you need detailed operational control, extensive automation, or active support from a modern vendor.
Counter is the better choice for active hostels and small hotels focused on operational efficiency and guest management. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its current effectiveness and support quality.
Rezovation, while historically a solid platform, lacks recent user feedback to verify its current state. Without recent validation, it’s risky to rely on Rezovation for critical hotel operations today.
Counter’s extensive features, strong support, and proven user satisfaction make it the clear leader for your property management needs. If simplicity, automation, and active support matter most, Counter is your best bet.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Rezovation 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Rezovation 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Rezovation 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Rezovation:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Rezovation 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问