The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #78 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #77 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #52 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #62 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Roomsy by Roomsy hinges on your property’s specific needs and operational priorities. Counter excels with its extensive feature set and active user base, especially in the hostel segment, while Roomsy’s simplicity and broad geographic reach are appealing but less proven given its lack of recent reviews. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches differ markedly.
Counter is a full-featured PMS with a strong reputation backed by over 54 recent reviews, giving it a clear edge in credibility and ongoing support. Roomsy’s limited review presence and lack of recent feedback make it a less reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven functionality today. So, which product better suits your hotel’s goals?
Counter by Counter is designed as an all-in-one platform tailored primarily for hostels, with a focus on automation, multi-platform integration, and operational efficiency. Its key strength is its extensive feature list, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and guest CRM, all built into a single system. Conversely, Roomsy offers a simplified hotel management experience, emphasizing ease of use and mobility, yet it lacks the depth of features and regional presence Counter provides.
The primary divergence lies in market focus: Counter has a broad regional footprint, especially in Europe and North America, and a user base primarily composed of hostels, boutique hotels, and city center properties. Roomsy’s geographic footprint and detailed hotel segment data are limited, but it promotes a straightforward approach suitable for small to medium-sized hotels. Given Counter’s more comprehensive feature set and recent review volume, it’s a safer choice for properties seeking robust management tools.
Would your hotel benefit more from a feature-rich platform or a simplified interface?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS capable of handling multiple revenue streams, channel distribution, and guest management workflows, go with Counter. Its 54 recent reviews, high overall rating of 4.73/5, and strong customer support (4.96/5) show it’s trusted in the market. It’s ideal for hostels and similar properties that prioritize automation and operational control.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, ease of onboarding, and a lightweight system that offers basic management functions, Roomsy might appeal. However, given the lack of recent reviews and limited feature details, it’s less proven and less comprehensive than Counter. For hoteliers aiming for reliability and extensive functionality, Counter remains the better pick.
Are you looking for a feature-packed system or a straightforward management tool?
Counter’s user interface is highly rated at 4.6/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and ease of onboarding. Users mention that staff can learn the system quickly, and its mobile-friendly layout supports remote management. Conversely, Roomsy offers a simplified experience, but without recent reviews, we lack concrete data on its usability.
Given Counter’s strong reputation for ease of use, fast onboarding, and positive staff feedback, it clearly has the edge. Its interface appears well-suited for busy hotel teams that need quick adoption and minimal training.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. Roomsy’s features are not detailed, and it lacks the extensive integrations Counter provides. No features exclusive to Roomsy have been listed, placing it at a disadvantage.
Counter’s broad feature set supports complex operations and diverse revenue streams, making it suitable for properties with higher management demands. Roomsy’s simplicity may suffice for small hotels but doesn’t match Counter’s capabilities.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support is rated at 4.96/5 based on recent reviews, with many hoteliers highlighting the responsiveness and professionalism of support staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers mention quick responses and helpful assistance, although some note slower support during certain hours.
Roomsy offers no recent reviews or detailed support feedback, making it impossible to assess. Given Counter’s high support rating and active user feedback, it’s clear that support quality favors Counter.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 7 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, WuBook, FLYR, Channex, and Goki. Roomsy has only 2 verified integrations, with no details on additional partners. Shared integrations with Counter include SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, but Counter’s broader integration ecosystem makes it more adaptable.
This extensive integration network enhances operational flexibility, allowing your hotel to connect with more channels, payment gateways, and experience management tools.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in the last 6 months) consistently rate it above 4.7/5, especially among hostel operators, who praise its ease of use and robust features. Roomsy has no recent reviews or detailed ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction.
Given Counter’s active user base and recent positive feedback, hoteliers clearly rate it higher. Its proven track record and reliable support make it the preferred choice for properties seeking a trusted management system.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not specify a pricing model publicly but is not offered as a freemium or subscription-based system—implying custom or enterprise pricing. Roomsy’s pricing details are also unavailable, with no clear subscription or fee structure provided.
Without concrete price points, your best bet is to contact vendors directly for quotes. However, Counter’s extensive feature set suggests it may be priced accordingly for larger, more complex properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter by Counter delivers a proven, feature-rich PMS specifically designed for hostels and similar properties, supported by a large, active user base. Its extensive integrations, high support ratings, and comprehensive feature set make it suitable for hotels that need robust management tools.
Roomsy offers a simpler, more streamlined management experience, but with no recent reviews or detailed feature list, it’s less compelling for hotels seeking proven reliability. For most properties—especially those planning for growth or requiring advanced capabilities—Counter is the clear choice.
Choose Counter if you want a trusted system with extensive support, integrations, and features. Opt for Roomsy only if your operation is very small, highly simplified, and your main priority is ease of use over features.
This comparison emphasizes Counter’s market presence, functional depth, and recent user validation, making it the preferred choice for hotels seeking a dependable and versatile PMS solution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Roomsy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roomsy 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Roomsy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Roomsy 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问